The aim of this piece of work is to evaluate the impact of the CLAHRC NWL Heart Failure Care Bundle project, actively funded by the CLAHRC at London North West Healthcare NHS Trust during October 2014 to March 2016 inclusive. The project's main objective was to improve quality of care against a set of evidence based standards constituting a care bundle, with a view to improving the management of patients' heart failure and ultimately improving their quality of life.
The set of relevant research questions all take the following form:
For [heart failure patients], was there a difference in [outcome measure] between i) the periods before and after the bundle was implemented ii) patients who did and did not receive the care bundle?
Here, heart failure patients may be defined in one of two ways: a) as those with primary ICD10 code in a specified set of heart failure codes, and b) as those with such a code in any coding position (secondary, tertiary etc.). The outcome measures of interest are the following:
There are thus 2 $\times$ 2 $\times$ 6 = 24 different research questions of interest in this study, which can be referred to for simplicity using the shorthand (a)(1)(i) = "For patients with primary diagnosis heart failure, was there a difference in length of stay in hospital between the periods before and after the bundle was implemented?"
Additionally, each question will be addressed both with and without accounting for covariates.
Three datasets are available for analysis.
In each dataset patients are identified by a unique study number, created through a pseudonymisation process.
Each of the six outcome variables listed above may be calculated for a given patient spell in hospital, and aggregated up over "space" (e.g. ward, hospital site) and time (e.g. month of discharge, week of admission). Note that for (1) and (2) the spell-level variable is the same, whilst the aggregation is different.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.