tests/testthat/_snaps/efa_average.md

print output is stable

Code
  print(efa_def, plot = FALSE)
Output

  Averaging performed with averaging method mean (trim = 0) across 72 EFAs,
  varying the following settings: init_comm, criterion_type, k_promax, p_type,
  and varimax_type.

  The error rate is at <pct>. Of the solutions that did not result in an error, <pct>
  converged. Of the solutions that converged, <pct> contained Heywood cases and <pct>
  were admissible.

  == Indicator-to-Factor Correspondences =========================================

  For each cell, the proportion of solutions including the respective
  indicator-to-factor correspondence. A salience threshold of <num> was used to
  determine indicator-to-factor correspondences.

        F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  == Loadings ====================================================================

  -- Mean ------------------------------------------------------------------------

         F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  -- Range (max − min) -----------------------------------------------------------

        F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  == Factor Intercorrelations from Oblique Solutions =============================

  -- Mean ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        F1 F2 F3
  F1 <num>
  F2 <num> <num>
  F3 <num> <num> <num>

  -- Range (max − min) -----------------------------------------------------------

       F1 F2 F3
  F1 <num>
  F2 <num> <num>
  F3 <num> <num> <num>

  == Variances Accounted for =====================================================

  -- Mean ------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   F1 F2 F3
  SS loadings <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Tot Var <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Comm Var <num> <num> <num>

  -- Range (max − min) -----------------------------------------------------------

                  F1 F2 F3
  SS loadings <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Tot Var <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Comm Var <num> <num> <num>

  == Model Fit ===================================================================

  The fit indices are the mean of the per-solution fit indices, not the fit of
  the averaged loadings printed above, which are a cell-wise summary rather than
  a fitted solution.

  CAF, RMSR, and SRMR averaged over <n> of 72 solutions.

         M (SD) [Min; Max]
  CAF: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  RMSR: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  SRMR: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  df: 102
Code
  print(efa_all_none, stat = c("average", "sd", "min", "max"), plot = FALSE)
Output

  Averaging performed with averaging method mean (trim = 0) across 12 EFAs,
  varying the following settings: estimator, init_comm, criterion_type,
  abs_eigen, max_iter, and start_method.

  The error rate is at <pct>. Of the solutions that did not result in an error, <pct>
  converged. Of the solutions that converged, <pct> contained Heywood cases and <pct>
  were admissible.

  == Indicator-to-Factor Correspondences =========================================

  For each cell, the proportion of solutions including the respective
  indicator-to-factor correspondence. A salience threshold of <num> was used to
  determine indicator-to-factor correspondences.

        F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  == Loadings ====================================================================

  -- Mean ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  -- Standard Deviation ----------------------------------------------------------

        F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  -- Minimum ---------------------------------------------------------------------

        F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  -- Maximum ---------------------------------------------------------------------

        F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  == Variances Accounted for =====================================================

  -- Mean ------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   F1 F2 F3
  SS loadings <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Tot Var <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Comm Var <num> <num> <num>

  -- Standard Deviation ----------------------------------------------------------

                  F1 F2 F3
  SS loadings <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Tot Var <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Comm Var <num> <num> <num>

  -- Minimum ---------------------------------------------------------------------

                   F1 F2 F3
  SS loadings <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Tot Var <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Comm Var <num> <num> <num>

  -- Maximum ---------------------------------------------------------------------

                   F1 F2 F3
  SS loadings <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Tot Var <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Comm Var <num> <num> <num>

  == Model Fit ===================================================================

  The fit indices are the mean of the per-solution fit indices, not the fit of
  the averaged loadings printed above, which are a cell-wise summary rather than
  a fitted solution.

  Chi-square-based indices averaged over <n> of 12 solutions.
  CAF, RMSR, and SRMR averaged over <n> of 12 solutions.

         M (SD) [Min; Max]
  χ²: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  df: 102
  p: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  CFI: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  TLI: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  RMSEA: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  AIC: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  BIC: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  ECVI: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  CAF: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  RMSR: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  SRMR: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
Code
  print(efa_all_md, plot = FALSE)
Output

  Averaging performed with averaging method median across 183 EFAs, varying the
  following settings: estimator, init_comm, criterion_type, abs_eigen, max_iter,
  start_method, rotation, k_promax, p_type, and varimax_type.

  The error rate is at <pct>. Of the solutions that did not result in an error, <pct>
  converged. Of the solutions that converged, <pct> contained Heywood cases and <pct>
  were admissible.

  == Indicator-to-Factor Correspondences =========================================

  For each cell, the proportion of solutions including the respective
  indicator-to-factor correspondence. A salience threshold of <num> was used to
  determine indicator-to-factor correspondences.

        F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  == Loadings ====================================================================

  -- Median ----------------------------------------------------------------------

         F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  -- Range (max − min) -----------------------------------------------------------

        F1 F2 F3
  V1 <num> <num> <num>
  V2 <num> <num> <num>
  V3 <num> <num> <num>
  V4 <num> <num> <num>
  V5 <num> <num> <num>
  V6 <num> <num> <num>
  V7 <num> <num> <num>
  V8 <num> <num> <num>
  V9 <num> <num> <num>
  V10 <num> <num> <num>
  V11 <num> <num> <num>
  V12 <num> <num> <num>
  V13 <num> <num> <num>
  V14 <num> <num> <num>
  V15 <num> <num> <num>
  V16 <num> <num> <num>
  V17 <num> <num> <num>
  V18 <num> <num> <num>

  == Factor Intercorrelations from Oblique Solutions =============================

  -- Median ----------------------------------------------------------------------

        F1 F2 F3
  F1 <num>
  F2 <num> <num>
  F3 <num> <num> <num>

  -- Range (max − min) -----------------------------------------------------------

       F1 F2 F3
  F1 <num>
  F2 <num> <num>
  F3 <num> <num> <num>

  == Variances Accounted for =====================================================

  -- Median ----------------------------------------------------------------------

                   F1 F2 F3
  SS loadings <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Tot Var <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Comm Var <num> <num> <num>

  -- Range (max − min) -----------------------------------------------------------

                   F1 F2 F3
  SS loadings <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Tot Var <num> <num> <num>
  Prop Comm Var <num> <num> <num>

  == Model Fit ===================================================================

  The fit indices are the median of the per-solution fit indices, not the fit of
  the averaged loadings printed above, which are a cell-wise summary rather than
  a fitted solution.

  Chi-square-based indices averaged over <n> of 183 solutions.
  CAF, RMSR, and SRMR averaged over <n> of 183 solutions.

         Md (SD) [Min; Max]
  χ²: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  df: 102
  p: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  CFI: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  TLI: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  RMSEA: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  AIC: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  BIC: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  ECVI: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  CAF: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  RMSR: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]
  SRMR: <num> ( <num>) [ <num>; <num>]


Try the EFAtools package in your browser

Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.

EFAtools documentation built on Aug. 21, 2026, 5:16 p.m.