InDisc: A unified approach for obtaining and estimating...

Description Usage Arguments Details Value Author(s) References Examples

View source: R/InDisc.R

Description

A unified approach for obtaining and estimating unidimensional and multidimensional Item Response Theory (IRT) Dual Models (DMs) has been proposed by Ferrando (2019) and Ferrando & Navarro-Gonzalez (2020, submitted). DMs are intended for personality and attitude measures, are based on a Thurstonian response process, and are, essentially, extended standard IRT models with an extra person parameter that models the discriminating power of the individual. So, both items and individuals are considered as sources of measurement error in DMs.

Usage

1
InDisc(SCO, nfactors = 1, nquad = 30, model = "linear", approp = FALSE, display = TRUE)

Arguments

SCO

Raw sample scores.

nfactors

Number of factors to be assessed, between 1 (default) and 4.

nquad

The number of quadrature points for EAP estimation (default is 30).

model

TThe model to be used: 'graded' (DTGRM) or 'linear' (DTCRM).

approp

Determines if the appropiateness indices will be computed and printed in the console (logical variable, FALSE by default).

display

Determines if the output will be displayed in the console, TRUE by default. If it is TRUE, the output is returned silently and if it is FALSE, the output is returned in the console.

Details

InDisc is based on the procedure proposed by Ferrando (2019) and Ferrando & Navarro-Gonzalez (2020, submitted) for estimating unidimensional and multidimensional Item Response Theory (IRT) Dual Models (DMs).Estimation is based on a two stage (calibration and scoring) random-regressors approach (McDonald, 1982). Item calibration at the first stage is the same as in the corresponding standard IRT models, is based on a factor-analytic Underlying-Variables approach, and uses an unweighted least squares, (ULS) minimum-residual criterion as implemented in the psych R package (Revelle, 2018). Individual trait scores and individual discriminations are obtained at the second stage using Expected a Posteriori (EAP) Bayes estimation. Overall, the combined ULS-EAP estimation procedure is simple, robust, and can handle large datasets, both in terms of sample size and test length.

Value

INDIES

Matrix including the theta scores, the PDDs, the PSDs (theta), the PSDs (PDD) and the reliabilities for the theta scores and the PDD for each participant.

degrees_of_freedom

Degrees of freedom for the model.

Model_Chi_Square

Chi Square statistic for assessing model-data fit, with the indicated degrees of freedom.

RMSR

Root Mean Square of the Residuals.

TLI

Tucker Lewis Index goodness-of-fit index.

RMSEA

Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation.

EVARI

Average of the PDDs.

reli_theta

Marginal reliability of the trait estimates.

aver_r_theta

Average of the individual reliability (trait level).

reli_PDD

Marginal reliability of the PDD estimates.

aver_r_PDD

Average of the individual reliability (PDD).

LR_stat

Likelihood ratio statistic.

Q_Chi_square

Approximate Chi Square with N degrees of freedom based on the LRT_stat.

Author(s)

Pere Joan Ferrando

David Navarro-Gonzalez

References

Ferrando, P. J. (2019). A Comprehensive IRT Approach for Modeling Binary, Graded, and Continuous Responses With Error in Persons and Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43(5), 339-359. doi: 10.1177/0146621618817779

Ferrando, P. J. & Navarro-Gonzalez, D.(2020). A multidimensional IRT model for continuous and graded responses with error in persons and items. Educational and Psychological Measurement (submitted).

McDonald, R. P. (1982). Linear versus models in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 379-396. doi: 10.1177/014662168200600402

Revelle, W. (2018) psych: P Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version = 1.8.12.

Examples

1
2
3
4
5
6
## For speeding purposes, the number of observations and quadrature nodes have been
## reduced. For a proper use of InDisc, use the full dataset and the default quadrature
## nodes, and consider using the graded model.


InDisc(CTAC35[1:40,], nquad = 10, model = "linear", approp = FALSE, display = TRUE)

InDisc documentation built on June 16, 2021, 9:09 a.m.

Related to InDisc in InDisc...