| plot.SCREENING | R Documentation |
Plot method for the SCREENING object returned by
alphaScreening, sharpeScreening and
msharpeScreening. It reproduces the peer performance
screening plot of Ardia and Boudt (2018): funds are sorted by their
performance measure and, for each fund, the estimated outperformance
(\hat\pi^+), equal-performance (\hat\pi^0) and underperformance
(\hat\pi^-) ratios are displayed as a horizontal stacked bar. The
dashed diagonal lines depict the naive percentile-rank benchmark
(\hat\pi^0 = 0); the gap between the black \hat\pi^+ area and the
diagonal visualizes the luck correction.
## S3 method for class 'SCREENING'
plot(
x,
nblock = NULL,
reference = NULL,
band = 27.5,
colorset = c(grDevices::gray(0), grDevices::gray(0.8), grDevices::gray(0.5)),
...
)
x |
A |
nblock |
Optional number of equally-sized blocks into which the funds
(sorted by performance) are aggregated by averaging, as in Ardia and Boudt
(2018). Default: |
reference |
A logical value indicating whether the dashed
percentile-rank reference lines should be drawn. Default:
|
band |
Half-width (in percentage points) of the reference band drawn
around the central diagonal. Default: |
colorset |
Vector of three colors for the |
... |
Further graphical arguments passed to |
If the screening was run with screen_beta = TRUE, the alpha
(first) coefficient is used.
Invisibly returns the (sorted, possibly aggregated) matrix of ratios that is plotted.
David Ardia and Kris Boudt.
Ardia, D., Boudt, K. (2018). The peer performance ratios of hedge funds. Journal of Banking and Finance 87, pp.351–368. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.10.014")}
alphaScreening, sharpeScreening and
msharpeScreening.
data("hfdata")
set.seed(1234)
sc <- alphaScreening(hfdata[, 1:30], control = list(nCore = 1))
plot(sc)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.