Description Usage Arguments Details Value Author(s) References See Also Examples
analyze2x2
performs a causal Bayesian analysis of
a 2 x 2 table in which it is assumed that unmeasured confounding is
present. The binary treatment variable is denoted X =
0 (control), 1 (treatment); and the binary outcome variable
is denoted Y = 0 (failure), 1 (success). The
notation and terminology are from Quinn (2008).
1 2 | analyze2x2(C00, C01, C10, C11, a00, a01, a10, a11,
b00, b01, b10, b11, c00, c01, c10, c11, nsamp = 50000)
|
C00 |
The number of observations in (X=0, Y=0) cell of the table. In other words, the number of observations that received control and failed. |
C01 |
The number of observations in (X=0, Y=1) cell of the table. In other words, the number of observations that received control and succeeded. |
C10 |
The number of observations in (X=1, Y=0) cell of the table. In other words, the number of observations that received treatment and failed. |
C11 |
The number of observations in (X=1, Y=1) cell of the table. In other words, the number of observations that received treatment and succeeded. |
a00 |
One of four parameters (with |
a01 |
One of four parameters (with |
a10 |
One of four parameters (with |
a11 |
One of four parameters (with |
b00 |
One of two parameters (with |
b01 |
One of two parameters (with |
b10 |
One of two parameters (with |
b11 |
One of two parameters (with |
c00 |
One of two parameters (with |
c01 |
One of two parameters (with |
c10 |
One of two parameters (with |
c11 |
One of two parameters (with |
nsamp |
Size of the Monte Carlo sample used to summarize the posterior. |
analyze2x2
performs the Bayesian analysis of a 2 x 2
table described in Quinn (2008). summary
and plot
methods can be used to examine the output.
An object of class SimpleTable
.
Kevin M. Quinn
Quinn, Kevin M. 2008. “What Can Be Learned from a Simple Table: Bayesian Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Effects from 2 x 2 and 2 x 2 x K Tables in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding.” Working Paper.
ConfoundingPlot
, analyze2x2xK
, ElicitPsi
, summary.SimpleTable
, plot.SimpleTable
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 | ## Not run:
## Example from Quinn (2008)
## (original data from Oliver and Wolfinger. 1999.
## ``Jury Aversion and Voter Registration.''
## American Political Science Review. 93: 147-152.)
##
## Y=0 Y=1
## X=0 19 143
## X=1 114 473
##
## uniform prior on the potential outcome distributions
S.unif <- analyze2x2(C00=19, C01=143, C10=114, C11=473,
a00=.25, a01=.25, a10=.25, a11=.25,
b00=1, c00=1, b01=1, c01=1,
b10=1, c10=1, b11=1, c11=1)
summary(S.unif)
plot(S.unif)
## a prior belief in an essentially negative monotonic treatment effect
S.mono <- analyze2x2(C00=19, C01=143, C10=114, C11=473,
a00=.25, a01=.25, a10=.25, a11=.25,
b00=0.02, c00=10, b01=25, c01=3,
b10=3, c10=25, b11=10, c11=0.02)
summary(S.mono)
plot(S.mono)
## End(Not run)
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.