Nothing
#' @keywords internal
#' @importFrom utils capture.output
"_PACKAGE"
#' TSQCA: Threshold-Sweep Extensions for Qualitative Comparative Analysis
#'
#' @description
#' The TSQCA package provides a systematic framework for analyzing threshold
#' dependency in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Rather than relying
#' on a single calibration threshold, TSQCA systematically explores how
#' sufficient conditions change across different threshold levels, revealing
#' the dynamic structure of causal configurations.
#'
#' @details
#' ## Overview
#'
#' TSQCA extends existing QCA methodology by transforming the calibration
#' stage from a fixed prerequisite into an analytical object. The package
#' utilizes existing QCA packages (particularly the \pkg{QCA} package's
#' \code{truthTable()} and \code{minimize()} functions) internally, and
#' focuses on the systematic exploration of threshold parameter space.
#'
#' ## Core Philosophy
#'
#' Traditional QCA assumes researchers select a single calibration threshold
#' exogenously and extract sufficient conditions based on that threshold.
#' TSQCA restructures this process by:
#'
#' \itemize{
#' \item Executing QCA repeatedly across multiple threshold values
#' \item Systematically analyzing changes in obtained solutions
#' \item Extracting solution stability, critical points, and hierarchical
#' causal structures
#' }
#'
#' This makes TSQCA a complementary meta-analytical framework that sits
#' above existing QCA, not a replacement for it.
#'
#' ## Four Core Methods
#'
#' \describe{
#' \item{\strong{OTS-QCA} (Outcome Threshold Sweep)}{
#' Varies the outcome threshold (e.g., Y >= 6, 7, 8, 9) to identify
#' how sufficient conditions change with different target levels of
#' the outcome.
#' }
#' \item{\strong{CTS-QCA} (Condition Threshold Sweep)}{
#' Varies a single condition's threshold (e.g., X >= 5, 6, 7, 8) to
#' identify the "onset point" where the condition begins to demonstrate
#' causal efficacy.
#' }
#' \item{\strong{MCTS-QCA} (Multi-dimensional Condition Threshold Sweep)}{
#' Simultaneously explores threshold combinations across multiple
#' conditions (Cartesian product space), visualizing regions of stable
#' solutions and critical boundaries where causal structures shift.
#' }
#' \item{\strong{DTS-QCA} (Dual Threshold Sweep)}{
#' Simultaneously varies both outcome and condition thresholds in a
#' two-dimensional sweep, enabling analysis of how target outcome
#' levels and condition improvement levels interact.
#' }
#' }
#'
#' ## Key Advantages
#'
#' \itemize{
#' \item \strong{Addresses Threshold Dependency}: Makes calibration
#' uncertainty explicit rather than hidden
#' \item \strong{Reveals Hierarchical Causality}: Identifies how
#' conditions operate at different threshold levels
#' \item \strong{Detects Critical Points}: Locates threshold tipping
#' points where causal structures transform
#' \item \strong{Enhances Robustness}: Tests solution stability across
#' threshold ranges
#' \item \strong{Supports Theory Building}: Generates theoretical
#' insights from threshold variation patterns
#' }
#'
#' ## Relationship with QCA Package
#'
#' TSQCA is built on top of the \pkg{QCA} package (Duşa, 2024). All threshold
#' sweep functions use \code{\link[QCA]{truthTable}} and \code{\link[QCA]{minimize}}
#' internally. Function arguments such as \code{incl.cut}, \code{n.cut},
#' \code{pri.cut}, \code{include}, and \code{dir.exp} follow QCA package
#' conventions. For detailed explanations of these parameters, please refer to
#' the QCA package documentation:
#'
#' \itemize{
#' \item \code{\link[QCA]{truthTable}} - For threshold and frequency cutoffs
#' (\code{incl.cut}, \code{n.cut}, \code{pri.cut})
#' \item \code{\link[QCA]{minimize}} - For minimization parameters
#' (\code{include}, \code{dir.exp})
#' }
#'
#' This design ensures:
#'
#' \itemize{
#' \item \strong{QCA package's role}: Truth table generation, logical
#' minimization, consistency/coverage calculation
#' \item \strong{TSQCA's role}: Systematic threshold exploration,
#' stability analysis, critical point detection
#' \item \strong{Integration}: TSQCA calls QCA functions internally;
#' it does not reimplement core QCA algorithms
#' \item \strong{Compatibility}: Works seamlessly with established QCA
#' workflows while adding new analytical capabilities
#' }
#'
#' ## Three Types of QCA Solutions
#'
#' As of version 1.1.0, TSQCA uses the same defaults as \code{QCA::minimize()}:
#'
#' \describe{
#' \item{\strong{Complex Solution} (default)}{
#' \code{include = ""}, \code{dir.exp = NULL}.
#' Does not use logical remainders. Most conservative interpretation.
#' }
#' \item{\strong{Parsimonious Solution}}{
#' \code{include = "?"}, \code{dir.exp = NULL}.
#' Uses all logical remainders. Most simplified form.
#' }
#' \item{\strong{Intermediate Solution}}{
#' \code{include = "?"}, \code{dir.exp = c(1, 1, ...)}.
#' Uses only theory-consistent remainders. Most common in publications.
#' }
#' }
#'
#' ## Typical Workflow
#'
#' \enumerate{
#' \item Prepare data with continuous or ordinal variables
#' \item Define threshold sequences for conditions and/or outcomes
#' \item Apply appropriate sweep method (OTS/CTS/MCTS/DTS)
#' \item Analyze threshold-dependent solution changes
#' \item Visualize stability regions and critical transitions
#' \item Interpret hierarchical causal structures
#' }
#'
#' ## Application Domains
#'
#' TSQCA is particularly valuable in fields where:
#'
#' \itemize{
#' \item Continuous indicators are common (marketing, organizational research)
#' \item Threshold choices lack strong theoretical foundation
#' \item Exploratory theory building is the goal
#' \item KPI-level thresholds have practical significance
#' \item Solution robustness is critical
#' }
#'
#' @section Main Functions:
#'
#' \describe{
#' \item{\code{\link{otSweep}}}{Execute OTS-QCA (Outcome Threshold Sweep)}
#' \item{\code{\link{ctSweepS}}}{Execute CTS-QCA (Condition Threshold Sweep)}
#' \item{\code{\link{ctSweepM}}}{Execute MCTS-QCA (Multi-dimensional CTS)}
#' \item{\code{\link{dtSweep}}}{Execute DTS-QCA (Dual Threshold Sweep)}
#' }
#'
#' @references
#' Ragin, C. C. (2008). \emph{Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond}.
#' Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
#'
#' Dusa, A. (2024). \emph{QCA: Qualitative Comparative Analysis}.
#' R package version 3.22. \url{https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=QCA}
#'
#' @seealso
#' \itemize{
#' \item GitHub repository: \url{https://github.com/im-research-yt/TSQCA}
#' \item Bug reports: \url{https://github.com/im-research-yt/TSQCA/issues}
#' \item \pkg{QCA} package for standard QCA analysis
#' }
#'
#' @examples
#' \dontrun{
#' # Load package
#' library(TSQCA)
#' data(sample_data)
#'
#' # Define thresholds
#' thrX <- c(X1 = 7, X2 = 7, X3 = 7)
#'
#' # Example 1: Complex solution (default, most conservative)
#' result_comp <- otSweep(
#' dat = sample_data,
#' outcome = "Y",
#' conditions = c("X1", "X2", "X3"),
#' sweep_range = 6:8,
#' thrX = thrX
#' )
#'
#' # Example 2: Parsimonious solution (uses all logical remainders)
#' result_pars <- otSweep(
#' dat = sample_data,
#' outcome = "Y",
#' conditions = c("X1", "X2", "X3"),
#' sweep_range = 6:8,
#' thrX = thrX,
#' include = "?"
#' )
#'
#' # Example 3: Intermediate solution (most common in publications)
#' result_int <- otSweep(
#' dat = sample_data,
#' outcome = "Y",
#' conditions = c("X1", "X2", "X3"),
#' sweep_range = 6:8,
#' thrX = thrX,
#' include = "?",
#' dir.exp = c(1, 1, 1)
#' )
#'
#' # Example 4: CTS-QCA with single condition threshold sweep
#' result_cts <- ctSweepS(
#' dat = sample_data,
#' outcome = "Y",
#' conditions = c("X1", "X2", "X3"),
#' sweep_var = "X1",
#' sweep_range = 5:8,
#' thrY = 7,
#' thrX_default = 7,
#' include = "?",
#' dir.exp = c(1, 1, 1)
#' )
#'
#' # See vignettes for detailed tutorials
#' vignette("TSQCA_Tutorial_EN", package = "TSQCA")
#' }
#'
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.