View source: R/model-uncfam_elimination.R
| uncfam_elimination | R Documentation |
A variant of uncfam() (Kachergis et al. 2012's uncertainty- and
familiarity-biased associative model) that adds inference by elimination
(mutual exclusivity) to how a trial's associative weight is allocated. If
the other words and objects on a trial are already confidently paired with
each other, the remaining word and object probably go together, so their
pairing should draw attention even though it is still weak. In
uncfam(), by contrast, an already-strong pair on the trial draws weight
away from such a pairing.
uncfam_elimination(X, B, C, eps)
X |
Associative weight to distribute |
B |
Weighting of uncertainty vs. familiarity |
C |
Decay |
eps |
Weight of elimination inference (0 = identical to |
On each trial, each on-trial pair (w', o') has a mutual confidence
q(w', o') = P(o'|w') P(w'|o'), from the row- and column-normalized
associations. A pair (w, o) gets elimination support
s(w, o) = \sum_{w' \ne w, o' \ne o} q(w', o'): how much of the rest
of the trial is accounted for by other pairs. The share of the trial's
weight X given to (w, o) is then
\frac{b(w, o) + \epsilon s(w, o)}{1 + \epsilon \sum s}
where b(w, o) is uncfam()'s normalized familiarity-and-uncertainty
share, so eps = 0 reproduces uncfam() exactly.
Motivated by the initial-accuracy experiment (kachergis_initial_accuracy), where learners were more accurate on an initially mis-paired word the more of its study trials it shared with a word they already knew.
An object of class xslMod
mod <- uncfam_elimination(X = .1, B = .98, C = 1, eps = 1)
xsl_run(mod, get_example_ambiguous_condition())
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.