Description Usage Arguments Details Value References Examples
Calculate aggregate best-worst scores using Elo scoring. This specific application comes from Hollis (2018). It makes each individual/block pairwise comparisons and updates Elo scores based on who won and lost those comparisons. No ties are considered, which occurs between all of the items that have not been selected as either best or worst. Hollis (2018) also recommends adding two "dummy items": one that defeats every other item, and one that loses to every other item. This is employed here. The default K is 30, per Hollis (2018). Since Elo is temporal in nature, Hollis also recommends running various iterations, each with a different randomization of the order of matchups. The default is the 100 used by Hollis. These are averaged together to calculate individual Elo best-worst scores. Elo scores are all initialized at 1000.
1 |
data |
A data.frame of the type described in details. |
id |
A string of the name of the id column. |
block |
A string of the name of the block column. |
item |
A string of the name of the item column. |
choice |
A string of the name of the choice column. |
K |
The Elo K-factor. The default is 30, per Hollis (2018). |
iter |
Number of different randomizations of the "matchup" order to iterate through. The default is Hollis's (2018, 2019) recommendation. |
This function requires data to be in a specified format. Each row must represent a respondent-block-label combination. That is, it indicates the person, the block (or trial), the item that was judged, and a column indicating whether it was chosen as best (+1), worst (-1), or wasn't selected as either (0).
A data.frame containing the item column as well as an "elo" column that indicates the Elo score.
Hollis, G. (2018). Scoring best-worst data in unbalanced many-item designs, with applications to crowdsourcing semantic judgments. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 711-729. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0898-2
Hollis, G. (2019). The role of number of items per trial in best-worst scaling experiments. Behavior Research Methods. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01270-w
1 2 3 4 |
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.