ICAapp: Application data
In ccmEstimator: Comparative Causal Mediation Estimation
Description
Usage
Format
References
Description
Application data used to illustrate comparative causal mediation analysis methods in Bansak (2020).
Usage
1
Format
a data frame with 14 variables
- respid
Anonymized respondent id.
- appr
Approval of U.S. government's decision. Response options include "Approve Strongly" (1), "Approve" (2), "Neither Approve nor Disapprove" (3), "Disapprove" (4), and "Disapprove Strongly" (5).
- dapprp
Indicator for disapproval of U.S. government's decision. Dichotomized version of 'appr', with 1 indicating "Disapprove" or "Disapprove Strongly", and 0 otherwise.
- vote
Propensity to reward/punish U.S. Senator who supported U.S. government's decision, in the form of increased/decreased willingness to vote for Senator. Response options include "Increase Greatly" (1), "Increase" (2), "Neither Increase nor Decrease" (3), "Decrease" (4), and "Decrease Greatly" (5).
- nvotep
Indicator for being less likely to vote for U.S. Senator who supported U.S. government's decision. Dichotomized version of 'vote', with 1 indicating "Decrease" or "Decrease Greatly", and 0 otherwise.
- moral
Perceived immorality of U.S. government's decision. Response options include "Definitely Right" (1), "Probably Right" (2), "Not Morally Right or Wrong" (3), "Probably Wrong" (4), and "Definitely Wrong" (5).
- immorp
Indicator for perceiving U.S. government's decision to be morally wrong. Dichotomized version of 'moral', with 1 indicating "Probably Wrong" or "Definitely Wrong", and 0 otherwise.
- retal
Belief regarding whether U.S. government's decision would encourage adversaries to follow suit in the future. Response options include "Agree Strongly" (1), "Agree" (2), "Neither Agree nor Disagree" (3), "Disagree" (4), and "Disagree Strongly" (5).
- retalp
Indicator for belief that U.S. government's decision would encourage adversaries to follow suit in the future. Dichotomized version of 'retal', with 1 indicating "Agree" or "Agree Strongly", and 0 otherwise.
- trt1
Indicator for assignment to informal commitment treatment condition.
- trt2
Indicator for assignment to legal commitment treatment condition.
- age
Age of respondent.
- male
Indicator for whether respondent is male (1) or female (0).
- educ
Highest level of education achieved by respondent, including less than high school (1), high school (2), some college (3), and college graduate (4).
References
Bansak, K. (2020). Comparative causal mediation and relaxing the assumption of no mediator-outcome confounding: An application to international law and audience costs. Political Analysis, 28(2), 222-243.
ccmEstimator documentation built on Sept. 28, 2021, 5:11 p.m.
R Package Documentation
Browse R Packages
We want your feedback!
Note that we can't provide technical support on individual packages. You should contact the package authors for that.
Description Usage Format References
Description
Application data used to illustrate comparative causal mediation analysis methods in Bansak (2020).
Usage
1 |
Format
a data frame with 14 variables
- respid
Anonymized respondent id.
- appr
Approval of U.S. government's decision. Response options include "Approve Strongly" (1), "Approve" (2), "Neither Approve nor Disapprove" (3), "Disapprove" (4), and "Disapprove Strongly" (5).
- dapprp
Indicator for disapproval of U.S. government's decision. Dichotomized version of 'appr', with 1 indicating "Disapprove" or "Disapprove Strongly", and 0 otherwise.
- vote
Propensity to reward/punish U.S. Senator who supported U.S. government's decision, in the form of increased/decreased willingness to vote for Senator. Response options include "Increase Greatly" (1), "Increase" (2), "Neither Increase nor Decrease" (3), "Decrease" (4), and "Decrease Greatly" (5).
- nvotep
Indicator for being less likely to vote for U.S. Senator who supported U.S. government's decision. Dichotomized version of 'vote', with 1 indicating "Decrease" or "Decrease Greatly", and 0 otherwise.
- moral
Perceived immorality of U.S. government's decision. Response options include "Definitely Right" (1), "Probably Right" (2), "Not Morally Right or Wrong" (3), "Probably Wrong" (4), and "Definitely Wrong" (5).
- immorp
Indicator for perceiving U.S. government's decision to be morally wrong. Dichotomized version of 'moral', with 1 indicating "Probably Wrong" or "Definitely Wrong", and 0 otherwise.
- retal
Belief regarding whether U.S. government's decision would encourage adversaries to follow suit in the future. Response options include "Agree Strongly" (1), "Agree" (2), "Neither Agree nor Disagree" (3), "Disagree" (4), and "Disagree Strongly" (5).
- retalp
Indicator for belief that U.S. government's decision would encourage adversaries to follow suit in the future. Dichotomized version of 'retal', with 1 indicating "Agree" or "Agree Strongly", and 0 otherwise.
- trt1
Indicator for assignment to informal commitment treatment condition.
- trt2
Indicator for assignment to legal commitment treatment condition.
- age
Age of respondent.
- male
Indicator for whether respondent is male (1) or female (0).
- educ
Highest level of education achieved by respondent, including less than high school (1), high school (2), some college (3), and college graduate (4).
References
Bansak, K. (2020). Comparative causal mediation and relaxing the assumption of no mediator-outcome confounding: An application to international law and audience costs. Political Analysis, 28(2), 222-243.
R Package Documentation
Browse R Packages
We want your feedback!
Note that we can't provide technical support on individual packages. You should contact the package authors for that.
Embedding an R snippet on your website
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.