RaceModels: Independent and partially anti-correlated Race Model for...

In dynConfiR: Dynamic Models for Confidence and Response Time Distributions

Independent and partially anti-correlated Race Model for Decision Confidence

Description

Probability densities and random number generators for response times, decisions and confidence judgments in the independent Race Model (dIRM/rIRM) or partially (anti-)correlated Race Model (dPCRM/rPCRM), i.e. the probability of a given response (response: winning accumulator (1 or 2)) at a given time (rt) and the confidence measure in the interval between th1 and th2 (Hellmann et al., 2023). The definition of the confidence measure depends on the argument time_scaled (see Details). The computations are based on Moreno-Bote (2010). The parameters for the models are mu1 and mu2 for the drift rates, a, b for the upper thresholds of the two accumulators and s for the incremental standard deviation of the processes and t0 and st0 for the minimum and range of uniformly distributed non-decision times (including encoding and motor time). For the computation of confidence judgments, the parameters th1 and th2 for the lower and upper bound of the interval for confidence measure and if time_scaled is TRUE the weight parameters wx, wrt, wint for the computation of the confidence measure are required (see Details).

Usage

dIRM(rt, response = 1, mu1, mu2, a, b, th1, th2, wx = 1, wrt = 0,
  wint = 0, t0 = 0, st0 = 0, s1 = 1, s2 = 1, s = NULL,
  time_scaled = TRUE, step_width = NULL)

dIRM2(rt, response = 1, mu1, mu2, a, b, th1, th2, wx = 1, wrt = 0,
  wint = 0, t0 = 0, st0 = 0, s1 = 1, s2 = 1, smu1 = 0, smu2 = 0,
  sza = 0, szb = 0, s = NULL, time_scaled = TRUE, step_width = NULL)

dPCRM(rt, response = 1, mu1, mu2, a, b, th1, th2, wx = 1, wrt = 0,
  wint = 0, t0 = 0, st0 = 0, s1 = 1, s2 = 1, s = NULL,
  time_scaled = TRUE, step_width = NULL)

rIRM(n, mu1, mu2, a, b, wx = 1, wrt = 0, wint = 0, t0 = 0, st0 = 0,
  s1 = 1, s2 = 1, s = NULL, smu1 = 0, smu2 = 0, sza = 0, szb = 0,
  time_scaled = TRUE, step_width = NULL, delta = 0.01, maxrt = 15)

rPCRM(n, mu1, mu2, a, b, wx = 1, wrt = 0, wint = 0, t0 = 0, st0 = 0,
  s1 = 1, s2 = 1, s = NULL, smu1 = 0, smu2 = 0, sza = 0, szb = 0,
  time_scaled = TRUE, step_width = NULL, delta = 0.01, maxrt = 15)

Arguments

rt	a numeric vector of RTs. For convenience also a data.frame with columns rt and response is possible.
response	numeric vector with values in c(1, 2), giving the accumulator that hit its boundary first.
mu1	numeric. Drift rate for the first accumulator
mu2	numeric. Drift rate for the second accumulator
a	positive numeric. Distance from starting point to boundary of the first accumulator.
b	positive numeric. Distance from starting point to boundary of the second accumulator.
th1	numeric. Lower bound of interval range for the confidence measure.
th2	numeric. Upper bound of interval range for the confidence measure.
wx	numeric. Weight on losing accumulator for the computation of the confidence measure. (Used only if time_scale=TRUE, 1)
wrt	numeric. Weight on reaction time for the computation of the confidence measure. (Used only if time_scale=TRUE, Default 0)
wint	numeric. Weight on the interaction of losing accumulator and reaction time for the computation of the confidence measure. (Used only if time_scale=TRUE, Default 0)
t0	numeric. Lower bound of non-decision time component in observable response times. Range: t0>=0. Default: 0.
st0	numeric. Range of a uniform distribution for non-decision time. Range: st0>=0. Default: 0.
s1	numeric. Diffusion constant of the first accumulator. Usually fixed to 1 for most purposes as it scales other parameters (see Details). Range: s1>0, Default: 1.
s2	numeric. Diffusion constant of the second accumulator. Usually fixed to 1 for most purposes as it scales other parameters (see Details). Range: s2>0, Default: 1.
s	numeric. Alternative way to specify diffusion constants, if both are assumed to be equal. If both (s1, s2 and s) are given, only s1 and s2 will be used.
time_scaled	logical. Whether the confidence measure should be time-dependent. See Details.
step_width	numeric. Step size for the integration in t0 (motor time). Default: 1e-6.
smu1	numeric. Between-trial variability in the drift rate of the first accumulator.
smu2	numeric. Between-trial variability in the drift rate of the second accumulator.
sza	numeric. Between-trial variability in starting point of the first accumulator.
szb	numeric. Between-trial variability in starting point of the second accumulator.
n	integer. The number of samples generated.
delta	numeric. Discretization step size for simulations in the stochastic process
maxrt	numeric. Maximum decision time returned. If the simulation of the stochastic process exceeds a decision time of maxrt, the response will be set to 0 and the maxrt will be returned as rt.

Details

The parameters are formulated, s.t. both accumulators start at 0 and trigger a decision at their positive boundary a and b respectively. That means, both parameters have to be positive. Internally the computations adapt the parametrization of Moreno-Bote (2010).

time_scaled determines whether the confidence measure is computed in accordance to the Balance of Evidence hypothesis (if time_scaled=FALSE), i.e. if response is 1 at time T and X_2 is the second accumulator, then

conf = b - X_2(T)

. Otherwise, if time_scaled=TRUE (default), confidence is computed as linear combination of Balance of Evidence, decision time, and an interaction term, i.e.

conf = wx (b-X_2 (T)) + wrt\frac{1}{\sqrt{T}} + wint\frac{b-X_2(T)}{\sqrt{T}}.

Usually the weights (wx, wrt, wint) should sum to 1, as the confidence thresholds (th1 and th2) may be scaled according to their sum. If this is not the case, they will be scaled accordingly internally! Usually, this formula results in lower confidence when the reaction time is longer but the state of the second accumulator is held constant. It is based on the optimal decision confidence in Moreno-Bote (2010).

For convenience, the likelihood function allows that the first argument is a data.frame containing the information of the first and second argument in the columns (i.e., rt and response). Other columns (as well as passing response separately as argument) will be ignored.

The simulations are done by simulating normal variables in discretized steps until one process reaches the boundary. If no boundary is met within the maximum time, response is set to 0.

Value

dIRM and dPCRM return the numerical value of the probability density in a numerical vector of the same length as rt.

rIRM and dPCRM return a data.frame with four columns and n rows. Column names are rt (response time), response (1 or 2, indicating which accumulator hit its boundary first), xl (the final state of the loosing accumulator), and conf (the value of the confidence measure; not discretized!).

The race parameters (as well as response, th1, and th2) are recycled to the length of the result (either rt or n). In other words, the functions are completely vectorized for all parameters and even the response.

Note

Similarly to the drift diffusion models (like ddiffusion and dWEV), s1 and s2 are scaling factors (s1 scales: mu1 and a, s2 scales: mu2 and b, and depending on response: if response=2, s1 scales th1,th2,and wrt), otherwise s2 is the scaling factor. It is sometimes assumed (Moreno-Bote, 2010), that both noise terms are equal, then they should definitely be fixed for fitting.

Author(s)

Sebastian Hellmann

References

Hellmann, S., Zehetleitner, M., & Rausch, M. (2023). Simultaneous modeling of choice, confidence and response time in visual perception. Psychological Review 2023 Mar 13. doi: 10.1037/rev0000411. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36913292.

Moreno-Bote, R. (2010). Decision confidence and uncertainty in diffusion models with partially correlated neuronal integrators. Neural Computation, 22(7), 1786–1811. doi:10.1162/neco.2010.12-08-930

Examples

# Plot rt distribution ignoring confidence
curve(dPCRM(x, 1, mu1=0.5, mu2=-0.5, a=1, b=1, th1=-Inf, th2=Inf, t0=0.1), xlim=c(0,2.5))
curve(dPCRM(x, 2, mu1=0.5, mu2=-0.5, a=1, b=1, th1=-Inf, th2=Inf, t0=0.1), col="red", add=TRUE)
curve(dIRM(x, 1, mu1=0.5, mu2=-0.5, a=1, b=1, th1=-Inf, th2=Inf, t0=0.1), lty=2,add=TRUE)
curve(dIRM(x, 2, mu1=0.5, mu2=-0.5, a=1, b=1, th1=-Inf, th2=Inf, t0=0.1),
      col="red", lty=2, add=TRUE)
# t0 indicates minimal response time possible
abline(v=0.1)
## Following example may be equivalently used for the IRM model functions.
# Generate a random sample
df1 <- rPCRM(5000,  mu1=0.2, mu2=-0.2, a=1, b=1, t0=0.1,
            wx = 1) # Balance of Evidence
# Same RT and response distribution but different confidence distribution
df2 <- rPCRM(5000,  mu1=0.2, mu2=-0.2, a=1, b=1, t0=0.1,
             wint = 0.2, wrt=0.8)
head(df1)

# Compute density with rt and response as separate arguments
dPCRM(seq(0, 2, by =0.4), response= 2, mu1=0.2, mu2=-0.2, a=1, b=1, th1=0.5,
         th2=2, wx = 0.3, wint=0.4, wrt=0.1, t0=0.1)
# Compute density with rt and response in data.frame argument
df1 <- subset(df1, response !=0) # drop trials where no accumulation hit its boundary
dPCRM(df1[1:5,], mu1=0.2, mu2=-0.2, a=1, b=1, th1=0, th2=Inf, t0=0.1)
# s1 and s2 scale other decision relevant parameters
 s <- 2  # common (equal) standard deviation
dPCRM(df1[1:5,], mu1=0.2*s, mu2=-0.2*s, a=1*s, b=1*s, th1=0, th2=Inf, t0=0.1, s1=s, s2=s)
s1 <- 2  # different standard deviations
s2 <- 1.5
dPCRM(df1[1:5,], mu1=0.2*s1, mu2=-0.2*s2, a=1*s1, b=1*s2, th1=0, th2=Inf, t0=0.1, s1=s1, s2=s2)


# s1 and s2 scale also confidence parameters
df1[1:5,]$response <- 2   # set response to 2
# for confidence it is important to scale confidence parameters with
# the right variation parameter (the one of the loosing accumulator)
dPCRM(df1[1:5,], mu1=0.2, mu2=-0.2, a=1, b=1,
     th1=0.5, th2=2, wx = 0.3, wint=0.4, wrt=0.1, t0=0.1)
dPCRM(df1[1:5,], mu1=0.2*s1, mu2=-0.2*s2, a=1*s1, b=1*s2,
      th1=0.5, th2=2, wx = 0.3/s1, wint = 0.4/s1, wrt = 0.1, t0=0.1, s1=s1, s2=s2)
dPCRM(df1[1:5,], mu1=0.2*s1, mu2=-0.2*s2, a=1*s1, b=1*s2,
      th1=0.5*s1, th2=2*s1, wx = 0.3, wint = 0.4, wrt = 0.1*s1, t0=0.1, s1=s1, s2=s2)

two_samples <- rbind(cbind(df1, ws="BoE"),
                   cbind(df2, ws="RT"))
# drop not finished decision processes
two_samples <- two_samples[two_samples$response!=0,]
# no difference in RT distributions
boxplot(rt~ws+response, data=two_samples)
# but different confidence distributions
boxplot(conf~ws+response, data=two_samples)
if (requireNamespace("ggplot2", quietly = TRUE)) {
require(ggplot2)
ggplot(two_samples, aes(x=rt, y=conf))+
  stat_density_2d(aes(fill = after_stat(density)),
                  geom = "raster", contour = FALSE, h=c(0.3, 0.7)) +
  xlim(c(0.2, 1.3))+ ylim(c(0, 2.5))+
  facet_grid(cols=vars(ws), rows=vars(response), labeller = "label_both")
}
# Restricting to specific confidence region
df1 <- df1[df1$conf >0 & df1$conf <1,]
dPCRM(df1[1:5,], th1=0, th2=1,mu1=0.2, mu2=-0.2, a=1, b=1, t0=0.1,wx = 1 )

dynConfiR documentation built on May 29, 2024, 5:10 a.m.