Nothing
#' eqivalenceTest: A package for evaluating equivalence of the means of two normal distributions.
#'
#' We implemented two equivalence tests which evaluate equivalence in the means of two normal distributions. The first is discussed by \insertCite{tsong2017development;textual}{equivalenceTest} and the second by \insertCite{weng2018improved;textual}{equivalenceTest}.
#'
#' Let \eqn{X_{I,i}\sim_{IID} N(\mu_I,\sigma_I)} for \eqn{I=T,R} and \eqn{i=1,...,n_I}, where \eqn{T} stands for test distribution and \eqn{R} for reference distribution.
#' The equivalence test here considers the following hypotheses,
#' \deqn{ H_0: |\mu_T - \mu_R| \ge \delta \;\mathrm{versus}\;H_1:|\mu_T - \mu_R| < \delta, }
#' where \eqn{\delta} is the equivalence margin.
#'
#' Let \eqn{\hat{\mu}_I} and \eqn{\hat{\sigma}_I^2} be the sample mean and unbiased sample variance estimates respectively for \eqn{I=T,R}.
#' \insertCite{tsong2017development;textual}{equivalenceTest} define the follows test statistics,
#' \deqn{\tau_1=\frac{\hat{\mu}_T-\hat{\mu}_R+\delta}{\sqrt{\hat{\sigma}_T^2/n_T^*+\hat{\sigma}_R^2/n_R^*}},}
#' and
#' \deqn{\tau_2=\frac{\hat{\mu}_T-\hat{\mu}_R-\delta}{\sqrt{\hat{\sigma}_T^2/n_T^*+\hat{\sigma}_R^2/n_R^*}},}
#' where \eqn{n_T^*=min\{n_T,1.5n_R\}} and \eqn{n_R^*=min\{n_R,1.5n_R\}} are possibly adjusted sample sizes proposed by \insertCite{dong2017adjustment;textual}{equivalenceTest}.
#'
#' The null hypothesis \eqn{H_0} is rejected at nominal size \eqn{\alpha} if both \eqn{\tau_1 > t_{1-\alpha,df^*}} and \eqn{\tau_2 < -t_{1-\alpha,df^*}} where \eqn{t_{1-\alpha,df^*}} is the \eqn{(1-\alpha)}-th quantile of the t-distribution with degree of freedom \eqn{df^*}, which is approximated by the Satterthwaite method with sample size adjusted and given as follows,
#' \deqn{df^*=\frac{\left(\frac{\hat{\sigma}_T^2}{n_T^*}+\frac{\hat{\sigma}_R^2}{n_T^*}\right)^2}{\frac{1}{n_B-1} \left(\frac{\hat{\sigma}_T^2}{n_T^*}\right)^2+\frac{1}{n_R-1} \left(\frac{\hat{\sigma}_R^2}{n_R^*}\right)^2}.}
#'
#' The above assumes that \eqn{\delta} is a predetermined constant. However, in many studies, such constant is not available, and \eqn{\delta} must be determined by the study data. A popular choice is \eqn{\delta=k\hat{\sigma_R}}. In this case, the above test may not control type I error well.
#'
#' Replacing \eqn{\delta} by \eqn{k\sigma_R}, the hypotheses becomes
#' \deqn{ H_0^\prime: |\mu_T - \mu_R| \ge k\sigma_R \;\mathrm{versus}\;H_a^\prime |\mu_T - \mu_R| < k\sigma_R. }
#'
#' \insertCite{weng2018improved;textual}{equivalenceTest} proposed an improved Wald test with the following test statistics,
#' \deqn{\tau_1^\prime=\frac{\hat{\mu}_T-\hat{\mu}_R+k\hat{\sigma}_R}{\sqrt{\frac{\tilde{\sigma}_{T,1}^2}{n_T^*}+\left(\frac{1}{n_R^*}+\frac{k^2V_{n_R}}{n_R-1}\right)\tilde{\sigma}_{R,1}^2}},}
#' \deqn{\tau_2^\prime=\frac{\hat{\mu}_T-\hat{\mu}_R-k\hat{\sigma}_R}{\sqrt{\frac{\tilde{\sigma}_{T,2}^2}{n_T^*}+\left(\frac{1}{n_R^*}+\frac{k^2V_{n_R}}{n_R-1}\right)\tilde{\sigma}_{R,2}^2}},}
#' where \eqn{V_{n_R} = n_R-1-2\frac{\Gamma^22(n_R/2)}{\Gamma^2((n_R-1)/2)}} and \eqn{\tilde{\sigma}_{T,i}} and \eqn{\tilde{\sigma}_{R,i}} are the restricted maximum likelihood estimator of \eqn{\sigma_T} and \eqn{\sigma_R} respectively with the constraint \eqn{\mu_T - \mu_R = (-1)^i \sigma_R}.
#'
#' The null hypothesis \eqn{H_0^\prime} is rejected at nominal size \eqn{\alpha} if both \eqn{\tau_1^\prime > z_{1-\alpha}} and \eqn{\tau_2^\prime < -z_{1-\alpha}} where \eqn{z_{1-\alpha}} is the \eqn{(1-\alpha)}-th quantile of the standard normal distribution.
#'
#' For more details, see the cited reference.
#'
#' @docType package
#' @name equivalenceTest
#' @import graphics
#' @import stats
#' @references
#' \insertAllCited{}
NULL
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.