knitr::opts_chunk$set( collapse = TRUE, comment = "#>", fig.align = 'center' ) old <- options(useFancyQuotes = FALSE) library("hydroroute")
The method developed by Greimel et al. (2016) detects and characterizes sub-daily flow fluctuations and is implemented in the R package hydropeak (available on CRAN). Based on the events detected by the method implemented in package hydropeak, hydroroute identifies associated events in hydrographs from neighboring gauging stations and models the translation and retention processes between them (Greimel et al., 2022).
This vignette presents the main function peaktrace()
which given the
events and relation information between gauging stations determines
the associated events and based on these, estimates predictive models
to trace initial values specified for the relevant metrics across the
neighboring gauging stations. First, an overview on the input data
required is given and the additional function get_lag()
and
variants thereof are presented which estimate the mean translation time of
the hydrographs between adjacent gauging stations, if not already
available. Then the individual function estimate_AE()
is presented
which is used by peaktrace()
to identify the associated events
(AEs). Finally the application of peaktrace()
is illustrated and it
is shown how the return value can be inspected.
Several data files are required to perform the analysis.
Q
If the mean translation time between hydrographs at neighboring
gauging stations is not given or known, the raw dataset Q
,
containing (equispaced) date-time values and the corresponding flow
fluctuations, is needed. Based on these data the mean translation time
between hydrographs at neighboring gauging stations may be estimated
using get_lag()
. The dataset Q
needs to contain three variables:
ID
Character string which refers to the identifier of the gauging station
(in Austria: HZBCODE).Time
Character string with date-time information of measurements.Q
Numeric, flow measurements.The combination of ID
and Time
must be unique. Functions that use
the dataset Q
assume that these variables are contained in this
order with exactly these names. If this is not the case, i.e., if the
columns have different names or are not in this order, the order can
be specified in these functions with argument cols
. The columns are
then renamed internally to make the data processable. Also the
date-time format must be specified if it is different from the
function's default format used.
The following code loads the sample dataset Q
and shows the first few rows:
Q_path <- system.file("testdata", "Q.csv", package = "hydroroute") Q <- read.csv(Q_path) head(Q)
The sample dataset Q
is a data frame with r nrow(Q)
rows and
r ncol(Q)
variables as described above. The station ID's along the flow
path are r paste(sort(unique(Q$ID)), collapse = ", ")
.
The time ranges from r dQuote(min(Q$Time))
to r dQuote(max(Q$Time))
.
relation
The dataset relation
provides information about the gauging stations
of neighboring hydrographs. It contains:
ID
Character string which refers to the identifier of the gauging station
(in Austria: HZBCODE).Type
Character string which characterizes the source hydrograph
(Turbine flow
, Gauge
, Basin outflow
).Station
Character string which indicates the order of the n
hydrographs
in relation
in downstream direction (Si
with i = 1, ..., n
).fkm
Numeric, position of hydrograph in km relative to the source.LAG
Character string which contains the cumulative mean
translation time (or estimated cumulative lag) between the source
and a specific gauging station in the format HH:MM
. For S1
this is either indicated as missing (NA
) or always given as
00:00
. It is either already provided in relation
or can be
estimated from the corresponding dataset Q
with get_lag()
.The following code loads an example dataset:
relation_path <- system.file("testdata", "relation.csv", package = "hydroroute") relation <- read.csv(relation_path) relation
The dataset relation
contains r nrow(relation)
adjacent gauging stations.
The output files from hydropeak's get_events_*()
function are used
to identify AEs. The naming scheme of the output files is
ID_event-type_date-time-from_date-time-to.csv
. Event types are
defined as follows:
The most important event types for the following analysis are 2
(increasing event; IC) and 4
(decreasing event; DC).
Package hydroroute includes 8 sample Event
files for each gauging
station ID contained in the sample dataset Q
and event type 2
(IC)
and 4
(DC) between "2014-01-01 00:00:00"
and "2014-02-28
23:45:00"
. The increasing events for the station with ID 100000
are
thus loaded using:
Sx <- system.file("testdata", "Events", "100000_2_2014-01-01_2014-02-28.csv", package = "hydroroute") Sx <- read.csv(Sx) head(Sx)
get_lag()
For the identification of AEs, the translation time between
neighboring hydrographs and the event amplitude have to be
considered. For the first criterion, the mean translation time (LAG
)
between hydrographs has to be estimated and the cumulative values
appended to the relation
data for further processing, if not
available yet.
Function get_lag_file()
uses:
Q_file
A path to a file that contains the Q
data from several
stations or a data frame that contains this information.relation_file
A path to a relation
file. The ID
s of the stations
must be in Q
.If the argument save
is TRUE
, the relation
data with appended
LAG
column is written to a file specified in outfile
. If a LAG
column already exists, argument overwrite
has to be set to TRUE
to
overwrite the existing column. The function can be applied to several
relation
files by iterating over file paths or if a single Q
data
file is available, get_lag_dir()
can be used. relation
files can
be selected from a directory using regular expressions (argument
relation_pattern
).
The following code shows this for single file names:
Q_file <- system.file("testdata", "Q.csv", package = "hydroroute") relation <- system.file("testdata", "relation.csv", package = "hydroroute") (get_lag_file(Q_file, relation, inputsep = ",", format = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M", save = FALSE, overwrite = TRUE))
This code indicates the use with get_lag_dir()
where the directory
is specified:
Q_file <- system.file("testdata", "Q.csv", package = "hydroroute") relations_path <- file.path(tempdir(), "testdata") dir.create(relations_path) file.copy(list.files(system.file("testdata", package = "hydroroute"), full.name = TRUE), relations_path, recursive = FALSE, copy.mode = TRUE) (get_lag_dir(Q_file, relations_path, inputsep = ",", inputdec = ".", format = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M", overwrite = TRUE))
estimate_AE()
Greimel et al. (2022) propose the following algorithm to identify AEs:
"For every event x
at the upstream hydrograph, the mean translation
time between the neighboring hydrographs (calculated by an
autocorrelation analysis) is subtracted from the downstream
hydrograph. This then captures several events from the downstream
hydrograph within a time slot +/- the translation time. Among those
matches only those events are retained where the relative difference
in amplitude is +/- one. In the following, a potential AE is the event
y
detected with the smallest time difference to x
after accounting
for the mean translation time meeting the time and amplitude
criteria. [...]
The relative difference in amplitude is then determined for these
events, and parabolas are fitted to the histograms obtained for the
relative difference data binned into intervals from -1 to 1 with a
width 0.1 by fixing the vertex at the inner maximum of the histogram
[...]. The width of the parabola is determined by minimizing the
average squared distances between the parabola and the histogram data
along arbitrary symmetric ranges from the inner maximum. Based on the
fitted parabola, cut points with the x
-axis are determined so that
only those potential AEs whose relative difference is within these cut
points are retained. If this automatic scheme does not succeed in
determining suitable cut points, e.g., because the estimated cut
points are outside the defined intervals, a strict criterion for the
relative difference in amplitude is imposed to identify AEs
considering only deviations of at most 10%."
estimate_AE()
estimates suitable settings for the amplitude based on
the method developed in Greimel et al. (2022) based on potential
associated events identified using the specified time and metric
deviations allowed for a match.
It performs this procedure for two neighboring hydrographs, i.e., it
takes a subset of relation
and the two corresponding Event
files
as input. The gauging station ID
s in the subset of relation
and
in the Event
files must match. Suitable settings for the amplitude
are estimated as follows:
Sy$Time
is shifted by the optimal mean translation time between
Sx
and Sy
.
Based on the specified time lags, matches between Sx
and Sy
are
captured.
Relative differences in AMP
are computed, e.g., (Sy$AMP - Sx$AMP)
/ Sx$AMP
, and only matches are retained where these relative
differences are within the range specified.
Matched events are iteratively filtered to retain those where the time lag is most similar leading to the potential AEs.
The relative differences of potential AEs are binned into intervals of
length 0.1 from -1 to 1. The created relative frequency table of the binned
relative differences is passed to function get_parabola()
where
either suitable cut points with the x-axis are determined or a
strict criterion is returned.
The table of the relative differences is visualized in a plot where the fitted parabola and the cut points with the x-axis are also shown.
The estimated settings for amplitude, a data frame of "real" AEs, i.e., associated events within the estimated cut points, and the plot are returned.
Note that the metric flow ratio (RATIO) does not make sense for S1
if the hydrograph is not of type Gauge
. So metric RATIO
is set to
NA
internally in this case.
The following code shows this procedure for two Event
files:
# file paths Sx <- system.file("testdata", "Events", "100000_2_2014-01-01_2014-02-28.csv", package = "hydroroute") Sy <- system.file("testdata", "Events", "200000_2_2014-01-01_2014-02-28.csv", package = "hydroroute") relation <- system.file("testdata", "relation.csv", package = "hydroroute") # read data Sx <- utils::read.csv(Sx) Sy <- utils::read.csv(Sy) relation <- utils::read.csv(relation) relation <- relation[1:2, ] # estimate AE, exact time matches results <- estimate_AE(Sx, Sy, relation, timeLag = c(0, 1, 0))
results$settings
Column bound
represents the lower, inner and upper bounds that are used to subset
potential AEs. lag
represents the time lag. Only exact matches are used in this
examples, which is specified by argument timeLag = c(0, 1, 0)
, which refers to
0 deviation at the lower and upper bound and 1 at the inner bound, meaning, that
the mean translation time from relation
is not altered when time matches are
computed.
results$plot_threshold
head(results$real_AE)
peaktrace()
Function peaktrace
combines the identification of potential AEs and
the estimation of suitable amplitude settings for a whole river
section as specified in a relation
file. In addition, the flow
metrics of the AEs are pictured by scatter plots and the translation
and retention process between the hydrographs is described by linear
models.
In the following, the input arguments of function peaktrace()
are
described:
relation_path
: Is the path where the whole relation file from a
river section is to be read from.
events_path
: Is the path of the directory where the Event
files
are located. These files must correspond to the format described
earlier in the section discussing the input data.
initial_values_path
: Is the path where initial values for
predicting the metric at the neighboring stations are to be read
from. It should not contain missing values. But missing values can be imputed
with a method specified in argument impute_method
, which is by default max
.
An example for such a file is:
initial_values_path <- system.file("testdata", "initial_value_routing.csv", package = "hydroroute") initials <- read.csv(initial_values_path) initials
The columns must be identical to this example. The content may vary. The initial values used for prediction must not contain any missing values.
Station
refers to the gauging station of the hydrograph. Here, all
initial values correspond to gauging station S1
except for metric
RATIO
, which starts at gauging station S2
.
Metric
corresponds to the metric. This is used to pick the
corresponding fitted predictive model.
Value
can be chosen arbitrarily or estimated with a data-driven
approach. A unique Name
is assigned which can be used to
characterize the curve obtained from this initial value used to
predict the metrics in downstream direction. E.g., for this example
the initial values are set to certain quantiles of the metrics at
station S1
.
The return value of function peaktrace()
is structured as follows:
event_type
.For each event_type
:
One element that contains the estimated settings from
estimate_AE()
for all gauging stations.
Plot of relative differences of AMP
with cut points from
settings_AE()` for all pairs of neighboring gauging stations.
Real AEs according to the estimated settings from estimate_AE()
for all pairs of neighboring gauging stations and a column
diff_metric
that contains the relative difference in AMP
.
A grid of scatter plots containing the AEs for neighboring hydrographs and for each metric with the fitted regression line.
Results of model fitting. Each row contains the corresponding stations and metric, the model type (default: "lm"), formula, coefficients, number of observations and $R^2$.
Plot of predicted values based on the initial values.
relation_path <- system.file("testdata", "relation.csv", package = "hydroroute") events_path <- system.file("testdata", "Events", package = "hydroroute") initial_values_path <- system.file("testdata", "initial_value_routing.csv", package = "hydroroute") res <- peaktrace(relation_path, events_path, initial_values_path)
The first list object refers to event type 2 (IC event).
res$`2`$settings
The settings
data frame contains the estimated time lag and metric
settings computed with estimate_AE()
. In this example with 4
stations, it contains nine rows where three rows describe the relation
between two neighboring stations. Since only exact time matches were
allowed, the lag
values are 0 for lower
and upper
bound and 1 for inner
.
metric
contains the range of relative values of the amplitude allowed.
Events, where the relative difference in amplitude and the relative difference
in time are within these settings, are considered as "real" AE and therefore events
caused by disruptive factors are excluded as far as possible.
The following plot shows the histograms obtained for the relative differences in amplitude for each pair of neighboring gauging stations binned into intervals from -1 to 1 of width 0.1. The dashed line shows the fitted parabola and the cut points of the parabola with the x-axis are indicated. Potential AEs where the relative difference is within these cut points are considered as "real" AEs.
grid::grid.draw(res$`2`$plot_threshold)
The "real" AEs can be inspected using:
head(res$`2`$real_AE)
The scatter plots of the metrics at the neighboring gauging stations
for the "real" AEs are contained in plot_scatter
. The scatter plots
are arranged in a grid where each row contains scatter plots for a
specific metric and each colums contains a different pair of
neighboring gauging stations. The x-axis is the upstream hydrograph
Sx
, the y-axis is the downstream hydrograph Sy
. A linear
regression line and the corresponding $R^2$ value are added to each
plot. By default the aspect ratio is fixed and the axis limits are
equal within each plot.
grid::grid.draw(res$`2`$plot_scatter)
The fitted regression models may also be inspected:
res$`2`$models
The models
data frame contains the fitted (linear) models for each pair of
neighboring stations and each metric.
station.x
is the upstream hydrograph Sx
.station.y
is the downstream hydrograph Sy
.metric
is the name of the corresponding metric.type
is the model class, by default lm
.formula
is the expression that is used to fit the model.(Intercept)
, x
are the extracted coefficients (called with coef
).n
is the number of events used to fit the model.r2
is the extracted or computed $R^2$ for each model.Finally the fitted regression models are used to predict the values of the metrics along the longitudinal flow path given the initial values:
gridExtra::grid.arrange(grobs = res$`2`$plot_predict$grobs, nrow = 3, ncol = 2)
If a file with initial values is passed to peaktrace()
, predictions
along the longitudinal flow path are made and visualized in a
plot. Each line in the plot represents a different scenario, e.g., the
uppermost solid lines for AMP, MAFR and MEFR represent the values of
Q_max
in the initial file. Starting from these initial values,
predictions are made with the corresponding models, e.g., the first
value of the initial valus file is passed to the model that describes
the relationship of AMP between S1
and S2
to predict the value at
S2
.
The initial value and the first fitted model are:
initials[1, ] res$`2`$models[1, ]
The resulting predicted value is then passed to the next model along the flow
path, i.e., the model of S2
and S3
to predict the value at S3
.
res$`2`$models[6, ]
Finally, this predicted value is passed to the last model along this river
section: the model between S3
and S4
to predict the value at S4
.
res$`2`$models[11, ]
This procedure is repeated for all metrics according to the initial
values file. Note that in this initial values file metric RATIO starts at
station S2
. Therefore the first value of RATIO to predict is at station
S3
.
The second list object refers to event type 4 (DC event). The nested objects of this event type are shown below.
res$`4`$settings
head(res$`4`$real_AE)
grid::grid.draw(res$`4`$plot_threshold)
grid::grid.draw(res$`4`$plot_scatter)
res$`4`$models
gridExtra::grid.arrange(grobs = res$`4`$plot_predict$grobs, nrow = 3, ncol = 2)
If estimated settings are already available, it is possible to use the
settings directly to extract "real" AEs from the Event
data. For
such an analysis, a path to a relation
file must be provided, as
well as a path to the Event
data and paths to settings
and initial
values.
The following code shows the extraction of "real" AEs based on the
settings
file which is included in the package after having been
generated with estimate_AE()
.
relation_path <- system.file("testdata", "relation.csv", package = "hydroroute") events_path <- system.file("testdata", "Events", package = "hydroroute") settings_path <- system.file("testdata", "Q_event_2_AMP-LAG_aut_settings.csv", package = "hydroroute") initials_path <- system.file("testdata", "initial_value_routing.csv", package = "hydroroute") real_AE <- extract_AE(relation_path, events_path, settings_path) head(real_AE)
With the extracted "real" AEs, the routing procedure can be performed to describe the translation and retention processes between neighboring hydrographs.
Therefore, the output from extract_AE()
(or similar, the output $real_AE
from
estimate_AE()
), the initial values data frame and the relation
data frame have to be
passed to function routing()
.
relation <- utils::read.csv(relation_path) initials <- utils::read.csv(initials_path) res <- routing(real_AE, initials, relation)
This produces the same scatter plot as before when peaktrace()
was called as the
events and the settings are the same.
grid::grid.draw(res$plot_scatter)
res$models
gridExtra::grid.arrange(grobs = res$plot_predict$grobs, nrow = 3, ncol = 2)
peaktrace()
with existing settingsIt the automatically determined settings using peaktrace()
are not
suitable, the settings files can be edited to insert manual
settings. In the following we use a path to a settings file for event
type 2
where between S2 and S3 the settings were modified to 0.75, 1
and 1.5 and no settings are provided for subsequent pairs of
stations. Function peaktrace()
is called again providing also the
path to this settings file and the resulting settings for event type
2
are inspected:
settings_path <- system.file("testdata", package = "hydroroute") res <- peaktrace(relation_path, events_path, initial_values_path, settings_path) res$`2`$settings
The procedure is then applied without determining the settings in an automatic way, but using those specified. The settings files can also only provide settings for some relations between neighboring stations which are then used, while for those relations between neighboring stations where no settings are provided, these are again determined using the automatic procedure.
options(old)
Greimel F, Zeiringer B, Höller N, Grün B, Godina R, Schmutz S (2016). "A Method to Detect and Characterize Sub-Daily Flow Fluctuations." Hydrological Processes, 30(13), 2063-2078. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10773
Greimel F, Grün B, Hayes DS, Höller N, Haider J, Zeiringer B, Holzapfel P, Hauer C, Schmutz S (2022). "PeakTrace: Routing of Hydropower Plant-Specific Hydropeaking Waves Using Multiple Hydrographs - A Novel Approach." River Research and Applications, 1-14. doi: 10.1002/rra.3978
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.