Nothing
#' @title Simulated Dataset
#'
#' @description The dataset consists of \eqn{N = 240} individuals and \eqn{R =
#' 4} data views with different data types. Two of the data views are
#' continuous, one is count, and one is binary. The \emph{true} number of
#' clusters was set to \eqn{K = 4}, and the cluster proportions were set at \eqn{\pi_1
#' = 0.25, \pi_2 = 0.25, \pi_3 = 0.25, \pi_4 = 0.25}, such that we have
#' balanced cluster proportions. Each of the data views had \eqn{p_r = 500}
#' features, \eqn{r = 1, \dots, 4}, but only 50, or 10\%, were relevant
#' features that contributed to the clustering, and the rest were noise
#' features that did not contribute to the clustering. In total, there were
#' \eqn{p = \sum_{r=1}^4 = 2000} features.
#'
#' For data view 1 (continuous), relevant features were generated from the
#' following normal distributions: \eqn{\text{N}(10, 1)} for Cluster 1,
#' \eqn{\text{N}(5, 1)} for Cluster 2, \eqn{\text{N}(-5, 1)} for Cluster 3,
#' and \eqn{\text{N}(-10, 1)} for Cluster 4, while noise features were
#' generated from \eqn{\text{N}(0, 1)}. For data view 2 (continuous), relevant
#' features were generated from the following normal distributions:
#' \eqn{\text{N}(-10, 1)} for Cluster 1, \eqn{\text{N}(-5, 1)} for Cluster
#' 2, \eqn{\text{N}(5, 1)} for Cluster 3, and \eqn{\text{N}(10, 1)} for
#' Cluster 4, while noise features were generated from \eqn{\text{N}(0, 1)}.
#' For data view 3 (binary), relevant features were generated from the
#' following Bernoulli distributions: \eqn{\text{Bernoulli}(0.05)} for Cluster
#' 1, \eqn{\text{Bernoulli}(0.2)} for Cluster 2,
#' \eqn{\text{Bernoulli}(0.4)} for Cluster 3, and \eqn{\text{Bernoulli}(0.6)}
#' for Cluster 4, while noise features were generated from
#' \eqn{\text{Bernoulli}(0.1)}. For data view 4 (count), relevant features
#' were generated from the following Poisson distributions:
#' \eqn{\text{Poisson}(50)} for Cluster 1, \eqn{\text{Poisson}(35)} for
#' Cluster 2, \eqn{\text{Poisson}(20)} for Cluster 3, and
#' \eqn{\text{Poisson}(10)} for Cluster 4, while noise features were generated
#' from \eqn{\text{Poisson}(2)}.
#'
#' @docType data
#' @keywords datasets
#' @name sim_data
#' @usage data(sim_data)
#' @format A list containing four datasets, and other elements of interest.
#'
NULL
#' @title LAML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia) Data
#'
#' @description This is a subset of the LAML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia) data
#' (TCGA, 2013). The Acute Myeloid Leukemia (laml_tcga) datasets were download
#' using the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics tool (Cerami et al., 2012; Gao et
#' al., 2013). The 170 samples with gene expression data and mutation data
#' were included. Only a subset of the genes was selected,
#' as desribed below. To access the data containing all the genes, please
#' visit: https://github.com/AbdalkarimA/iClusterVB
#'
#' @docType data
#' @name laml
#' @aliases laml.cli laml.exp laml.mut
#' @usage data(laml)
#' @return Within the data file, there is:
#' \item{\code{laml.cli}:}{ A dataframe
#' of clinical information for the 170 samples.}
#' \item{\code{laml.exp}:}{ A
#' matrix of 170 samples and the gene expression values of the 500 genes
#' chosen by Zainul Abidin and Westhead (2016) based on having the highest ranked-based
#' coefficients of variation and standard deviation across the samples.
#' Some names may have been updated or corrected from the
#' supplementary material.}
#' \item{\code{laml.mut}:}{ A
#' matrix of 170 samples and the mutation status of 156 genes that had >=2
#' mutations. 1 indicates the presence of mutation, and 0 indicates the
#' absence of mutation.}
#'
#'
#' @references Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Ley, T. J., Miller, C.,
#' Ding, L., Raphael, B. J., Mungall, A. J., Robertson, A., Hoadley, K.,
#' Triche, T. J., Jr, Laird, P. W., Baty, J. D., Fulton, L. L., Fulton, R.,
#' Heath, S. E., Kalicki-Veizer, J., Kandoth, C., Klco, J. M., Koboldt, D. C.,
#' Kanchi, K. L., Kulkarni, S., … Eley, G. (2013). Genomic and epigenomic
#' landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. The New England journal
#' of medicine, 368(22), 2059–2074. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1301689
#'
#' Cerami, E., Gao, J., Dogrusoz, U., Gross, B. E., Sumer, S. O., Aksoy, B.
#' A., Jacobsen, A., Byrne, C. J., Heuer, M. L., Larsson, E., Antipin, Y.,
#' Reva, B., Goldberg, A. P., Sander, C., & Schultz, N. (2012). The cBio
#' cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional
#' cancer genomics data. Cancer discovery, 2(5), 401–404.
#' https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095
#'
#' Gao, J., Aksoy, B. A., Dogrusoz, U., Dresdner, G., Gross, B., Sumer, S. O.,
#' Sun, Y., Jacobsen, A., Sinha, R., Larsson, E., Cerami, E., Sander, C., &
#' Schultz, N. (2013). Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and
#' clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Science signaling, 6(269), pl1.
#' https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2004088
#'
#' Zainul Abidin, F. N., & Westhead, D. R. (2017). Flexible model-based
#' clustering of mixed binary and continuous data: application to genetic
#' regulation and cancer. Nucleic acids research, 45(7), e53.
#' https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1270
NULL
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.