stagingData | R Documentation |
Staging of carcinoma is done by different medical professions. Gold standard is the (histo-)pathological rating of a tissue sample but this information typically only becomes available late, after surgery. However prior to surgery the carcinoma is also staged by radiologists in the clinical setting on the basis of MRI scans.
stagingData
A data frame with 21 observations and 6 variables:
the (histo-)pathological staging (gold standard) with categories I, II or III
the clinical staging with categories I, II or III by radiologist 1
the clinical staging with categories I, II or III by radiologist 2
the clinical staging with categories I, II or III by radiologist 3
the clinical staging with categories I, II or III by radiologist 4
the clinical staging with categories I, II or III by radiologist 5
These fictitious data were inspired by the OCUM trial. The simulation uses the following two assumptions: over-staging occurs more frequently than under-staging and an error by two categories is less likely than an error by only one category.
Stages conform to the UICC classification according to the TNM classification. Note that cases in stage IV do not appear in this data set and that the following description of stages is simplified.
I Until T2, N0, M0
II From T3, N0, M0
III Any T, N1/N2, M0
simulated data
Kreis, M. E. et al., MRI-Based Use of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Carcinoma: Surgical Quality and Histopathological Outcome of the OCUM Trial \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1245/s10434-019-07696-y")}
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.