estimate_slopes: Estimate Marginal Effects

In modelbased: Estimation of Model-Based Predictions, Contrasts and Means

Estimate Marginal Effects

Description

Estimate the slopes (i.e., the coefficient) of a predictor over or within different factor levels, or alongside a numeric variable. In other words, to assess the effect of a predictor at specific configurations data. It corresponds to the derivative and can be useful to understand where a predictor has a significant role when interactions or non-linear relationships are present.

Other related functions based on marginal estimations includes estimate_contrasts() and estimate_means().

See the Details section below, and don't forget to also check out the Vignettes and README examples for various examples, tutorials and use cases.

Usage

estimate_slopes(
  model,
  trend = NULL,
  by = NULL,
  ci = 0.95,
  p_adjust = "none",
  transform = NULL,
  keep_iterations = FALSE,
  backend = getOption("modelbased_backend", "marginaleffects"),
  verbose = TRUE,
  ...
)

Arguments

model	A statistical model.
trend	A character indicating the name of the variable for which to compute the slopes.
by	The (focal) predictor variable(s) at which to evaluate the desired effect / mean / contrasts. Other predictors of the model that are not included here will be collapsed and "averaged" over (the effect will be estimated across them). by can be a character (vector) naming the focal predictors, optionally including representative values or levels at which focal predictors are evaluated (e.g., by="x=c(1,2)"). When estimate is not "average", the by argument is used to create a "reference grid" or "data grid" with representative values for the focal predictors. In this case, by can also be list of named elements. See details in insight::get_datagrid() to learn more about how to create data grids for predictors of interest.
ci	Confidence Interval (CI) level. Default to 0.95 (⁠95%⁠).
p_adjust	The p-values adjustment method for frequentist multiple comparisons. For estimate_slopes(), multiple comparison only occurs for Johnson-Neyman intervals, i.e. in case of interactions with two numeric predictors (one specified in trend, one in by). In this case, the "esarey" option is recommended, but p_adjust can also be one of "none" (default), "hochberg", "hommel", "bonferroni", "BH", "BY", "fdr", "tukey", "sidak", or "holm".
transform	A function applied to predictions and confidence intervals to (back-) transform results, which can be useful in case the regression model has a transformed response variable (e.g., lm(log(y) ~ x)). For Bayesian models, this function is applied to individual draws from the posterior distribution, before computing summaries. Can also be TRUE, in which case insight::get_transformation() is called to determine the appropriate transformation-function. Note that no standard errors are returned when transformations are applied.
keep_iterations	If TRUE, will keep all iterations (draws) of bootstrapped or Bayesian models. They will be added as additional columns named iter_1, iter_2, and so on. If keep_iterations is a positive number, only as many columns as indicated in keep_iterations will be added to the output. You can reshape them to a long format by running bayestestR::reshape_iterations().
backend	Whether to use "marginaleffects" or "emmeans"as a backend. Results are usually very similar. The major difference will be found for mixed models, where backend = "marginaleffects" will also average across random effects levels, producing "marginal predictions" (instead of "conditional predictions", see Heiss 2022). You can set a default backend via options(), e.g. use options(modelbased_backend = "emmeans") to use the emmeans package or options(modelbased_backend = "marginaleffects") to set marginaleffects as default backend.
verbose	Use FALSE to silence messages and warnings.
...	Other arguments passed, for instance, to insight::get_datagrid(), to functions from the emmeans or marginaleffects package, or to process Bayesian models via bayestestR::describe_posterior(). Examples: insight::get_datagrid(): Argument such as length, digits or range can be used to control the (number of) representative values. marginaleffects: Internally used functions are avg_predictions() for means and contrasts, and avg_slope() for slopes. Therefore, arguments for instance like vcov, equivalence, df, slope or even newdata can be passed to those functions. A weights argument is passed to the wts argument in avg_predictions() or avg_slopes(), however, weights can only be applied when estimate is "average" or "population" (i.e. for those marginalization options that do not use data grids). Other arguments, such as re.form or allow.new.levels, may be passed to predict() (which is internally used by marginaleffects) if supported by that model class. emmeans: Internally used functions are emmeans() and emtrends(). Additional arguments can be passed to these functions. Bayesian models: For Bayesian models, parameters are cleaned using describe_posterior(), thus, arguments like, for example, centrality, rope_range, or test are passed to that function.

Details

The estimate_slopes(), estimate_means() and estimate_contrasts() functions are forming a group, as they are all based on marginal estimations (estimations based on a model). All three are built on the emmeans or marginaleffects package (depending on the backend argument), so reading its documentation (for instance emmeans::emmeans(), emmeans::emtrends() or this website) is recommended to understand the idea behind these types of procedures.

• Model-based predictions is the basis for all that follows. Indeed, the first thing to understand is how models can be used to make predictions (see estimate_link()). This corresponds to the predicted response (or "outcome variable") given specific predictor values of the predictors (i.e., given a specific data configuration). This is why the concept of reference grid() is so important for direct predictions.

• Marginal "means", obtained via estimate_means(), are an extension of such predictions, allowing to "average" (collapse) some of the predictors, to obtain the average response value at a specific predictors configuration. This is typically used when some of the predictors of interest are factors. Indeed, the parameters of the model will usually give you the intercept value and then the "effect" of each factor level (how different it is from the intercept). Marginal means can be used to directly give you the mean value of the response variable at all the levels of a factor. Moreover, it can also be used to control, or average over predictors, which is useful in the case of multiple predictors with or without interactions.

• Marginal contrasts, obtained via estimate_contrasts(), are themselves at extension of marginal means, in that they allow to investigate the difference (i.e., the contrast) between the marginal means. This is, again, often used to get all pairwise differences between all levels of a factor. It works also for continuous predictors, for instance one could also be interested in whether the difference at two extremes of a continuous predictor is significant.

• Finally, marginal effects, obtained via estimate_slopes(), are different in that their focus is not values on the response variable, but the model's parameters. The idea is to assess the effect of a predictor at a specific configuration of the other predictors. This is relevant in the case of interactions or non-linear relationships, when the effect of a predictor variable changes depending on the other predictors. Moreover, these effects can also be "averaged" over other predictors, to get for instance the "general trend" of a predictor over different factor levels.

Example: Let's imagine the following model lm(y ~ condition * x) where condition is a factor with 3 levels A, B and C and x a continuous variable (like age for example). One idea is to see how this model performs, and compare the actual response y to the one predicted by the model (using estimate_expectation()). Another idea is evaluate the average mean at each of the condition's levels (using estimate_means()), which can be useful to visualize them. Another possibility is to evaluate the difference between these levels (using estimate_contrasts()). Finally, one could also estimate the effect of x averaged over all conditions, or instead within each condition (using [estimate_slopes]).

Value

A data.frame of class estimate_slopes.

Examples

library(ggplot2)
# Get an idea of the data
ggplot(iris, aes(x = Petal.Length, y = Sepal.Width)) +
  geom_point(aes(color = Species)) +
  geom_smooth(color = "black", se = FALSE) +
  geom_smooth(aes(color = Species), linetype = "dotted", se = FALSE) +
  geom_smooth(aes(color = Species), method = "lm", se = FALSE)

# Model it
model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris)
# Compute the marginal effect of Petal.Length at each level of Species
slopes <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = "Species")
slopes

## Not run: 
# Plot it
plot(slopes)
standardize(slopes)

model <- mgcv::gam(Sepal.Width ~ s(Petal.Length), data = iris)
slopes <- estimate_slopes(model, by = "Petal.Length", length = 50)
summary(slopes)
plot(slopes)

model <- mgcv::gam(Sepal.Width ~ s(Petal.Length, by = Species), data = iris)
slopes <- estimate_slopes(model,
  trend = "Petal.Length",
  by = c("Petal.Length", "Species"), length = 20
)
summary(slopes)
plot(slopes)

## End(Not run)

modelbased documentation built on April 12, 2025, 2:22 a.m.