Description Usage Arguments Details Value References See Also Examples
Power calculation testing interaction effect for Cox proportional hazards regression with two covariates for Epidemiological Studies. Both covariates should be binary variables. The formula takes into account the correlation between the two covariates.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | powerEpiInt.default1(n,
theta,
psi,
p00,
p01,
p10,
p11,
alpha = 0.05)
|
n |
integer. total number of subjects. |
theta |
numeric. postulated hazard ratio. |
psi |
numeric. proportion of subjects died of the disease of interest. |
p00 |
numeric. proportion of subjects taking values X_1=0 and X_2=0, i.e., p_{00}=Pr(X_1=0,\mbox{and}, X_2=0). |
p01 |
numeric. proportion of subjects taking values X_1=0 and X_2=1, i.e., p_{01}=Pr(X_1=0,\mbox{and}, X_2=1). |
p10 |
numeric. proportion of subjects taking values X_1=1 and X_2=0, i.e., p_{10}=Pr(X_1=1,\mbox{and}, X_2=0). |
p11 |
numeric. proportion of subjects taking values X_1=1 and X_2=1, i.e., p_{11}=Pr(X_1=1,\mbox{and}, X_2=1). |
alpha |
numeric. type I error rate. |
This is an implementation of the power calculation formula derived by Schmoor et al. (2000) for the following Cox proportional hazards regression in the epidemoilogical studies:
h(t|x_1, x_2)=h_0(t)\exp(β_1 x_1+β_2 x_2 + γ (x_1 x_2)),
where both covariates X_1 and X_2 are binary variables.
Suppose we want to check if the hazard ratio of the interaction effect X_1 X_2=1 to X_1 X_2=0 is equal to 1 or is equal to \exp(γ)=θ. Given the type I error rate α for a two-sided test, the power required to detect a hazard ratio as small as \exp(γ)=θ is:
power=Φ≤ft(-z_{1-α/2}+√{\frac{n}{δ}[\log(θ)]^2 ψ}\right),
where z_{a} is the 100 a-th percentile of the standard normal distribution,
δ=\frac{1}{p_{00}}+\frac{1}{p_{01}}+\frac{1}{p_{10}} +\frac{1}{p_{11}},
ψ is the proportion of subjects died of the disease of interest, and p_{00}=Pr(X_1=0,\mbox{and}, X_2=0), p_{01}=Pr(X_1=0,\mbox{and}, X_2=1), p_{10}=Pr(X_1=1,\mbox{and}, X_2=0), p_{11}=Pr(X_1=1,\mbox{and}, X_2=1).
The power of the test.
Schmoor C., Sauerbrei W., and Schumacher M. (2000). Sample size considerations for the evaluation of prognostic factors in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine. 19:441-452.
powerEpiInt.default0
, powerEpiInt2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | # Example at the end of Section 4 of Schmoor et al. (2000).
# p00, p01, p10, and p11 are calculated based on Table III on page 448
# of Schmoor et al. (2000).
powerEpiInt.default1(n = 184,
theta = 3,
psi = 139 / 184,
p00 = 50 / 184,
p01 = 21 / 184,
p10 = 78 / 184,
p11 = 35 / 184,
alpha = 0.05)
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.