| bcrp | R Documentation |
Data from a three-arm randomized controlled trial. Women with early-stage breast cancer were randomly assigned to a nutrition intervention (n = 85), an education intervention (n = 83) or standard care (n = 84). They were measured before and after treatment. These data contain the baseline measurement and the 9-month follow-up.
bcrp
A data frame with 252 observations on the following 14 variables:
physt1physical functioning (from SF-36) at baseline.
cesdt1depression score (CESD) at baseline.
physt3physical functioning (from SF-36) at 9 months follow-up.
cesdt3depression score (CESD) at 9 months follow-up.
negsoct1negative social interaction at baseline.
uncomt1unmitigated communion at baseline.
disopt1dispositional optimism at baseline.
comorbidnumber of comorbidities (e.g. diabetes, migraines, arthritis, or angina).
ageage at baseline.
wcht1weight change since diagnosis: yes [1] or no [0].
nationalityCaucasian [1] or not [0].
maritalmarried [1] or not [0].
trexttreatment extensiveness index: lumpectomy without or with one form of adjuvant therapy (radiation or chemo) [-1.77], lumpectomy with radiation and chemotherapy [0.26], mastectomy without or with lumpectomy, and without or with one form of adjuvant therapy [0.56], mastectomy without or with lumpectomy, and radiation and chemotherapy [2.59].
condexperimental condition: nutrition [1], education [2] or standard care [3].
IMPORTANT: for questions about these data contact Elise Dusseldorp: elise.dusseldorp@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
The authors thank M.F. Scheier for making his data available.
If you use these data, please refer to: Scheier M.F., Helgeson V.S., Schulz R., et al. (2007). Moderators of interventions designed to enhance physical and psychological functioning among younger women with early-stage breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25, 5710-5714.
An example of a complete analysis on these data using the quint package is given in:
Dusseldorp, E., Doove, L., & Van Mechelen, I. (2016). Quint:
An R package for the identification of subgroups of clients who differ in
which treatment alternative is best for them. Behavior Research Methods,
48(2), 650-663. DOI 10.3758/s13428-015-0594-z.
An application of quint to these data is given in:
Dusseldorp E. and Van Mechelen I. (2014). Qualitative interaction trees:
a tool to identify qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions.
Statistics in Medicine, 33(2), 219-237. DOI: 10.1002/sim.5933.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.