ToyData3: Toy data set of rankings and ratings when judges express...
In rankrate: Joint Statistical Models for Preference Learning with Rankings and Ratings
ToyData3 R Documentation
Toy data set of rankings and ratings when judges express internally inconsistent preferences
Description
This toy data set includes 16 judges and 3 objects, and demonstrates the ability
of the Mallows-Binomial model to estimate overall object orderings even when judges provide
sets of rankings and ratings which are internally inconsistent.
Usage
ToyData3
Format
list with three elements: (1) rankings, a 16 x 3 matrix of rankings with one row per judge;
(2) ratings, a 16 x 3 matrix of ratings, with one row per judge and one column per object; and
(3) M, a number indicating the maximum (worst) integer score.
Source
Originally analyzed in: Gallo, Stephen A., et al. "A new approach to peer review assessments: Score, then rank" (2023). Research Integrity and Peer Review 8:10 (10). https://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7.
rankrate documentation built on April 12, 2025, 1:46 a.m.
R Package Documentation
Browse R Packages
We want your feedback!
Note that we can't provide technical support on individual packages. You should contact the package authors for that.
| ToyData3 | R Documentation |
Toy data set of rankings and ratings when judges express internally inconsistent preferences
Description
This toy data set includes 16 judges and 3 objects, and demonstrates the ability of the Mallows-Binomial model to estimate overall object orderings even when judges provide sets of rankings and ratings which are internally inconsistent.
Usage
ToyData3
Format
list with three elements: (1) rankings, a 16 x 3 matrix of rankings with one row per judge;
(2) ratings, a 16 x 3 matrix of ratings, with one row per judge and one column per object; and
(3) M, a number indicating the maximum (worst) integer score.
Source
Originally analyzed in: Gallo, Stephen A., et al. "A new approach to peer review assessments: Score, then rank" (2023). Research Integrity and Peer Review 8:10 (10). https://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7.
R Package Documentation
Browse R Packages
We want your feedback!
Note that we can't provide technical support on individual packages. You should contact the package authors for that.
Embedding an R snippet on your website
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.