predADD | R Documentation |
Predicts the occurrence times using the accumulated degree days method based on observed or predicted mean daily air temperatures (Aono, 1993; Shi et al., 2017a, b).
predADD(S, T0, AADD, Year2, DOY, Temp, DOY.ul = 120)
S |
the starting date for thermal accumulation (in day-of-year) |
T0 |
the base temperature (in |
AADD |
the expected annual accumulated degree days |
Year2 |
the vector of the years recording the climate data for predicting the occurrence times |
DOY |
the vector of the dates (in day-of-year) for which climate data exist |
Temp |
the mean daily air temperature data (in |
DOY.ul |
the upper limit of |
In the accumulated degree days (ADD) method (Shi et al., 2017a, b), the starting date
(S
), the base temperature
(T_{0}
), and the annual accumulated degree days (AADD, which is denoted by k
)
are assumed to be constants across different years. Let k_{i}
denote the AADD of
the i
th year, which equals
k_{i} = \sum_{j=S}^{E_{i}}\left(T_{ij}-T_{0}\right),
where E_{i}
represents the ending date (in day-of-year), i.e., the occurrence time of a particular
phenological event in the i
th year, and T_{ij}
represents the mean daily temperature of the
j
th day of the i
th year (in {}^{\circ}
C). If T_{ij} \le T_{0}
,
T_{ij} - T_{0}
is defined to be zero. In theory, k_{i} = k
,
i.e., the AADD values of different years are a constant. However, in practice, there is
a certain deviation of k_{i}
from k
that is estimated by \overline{k}
(i.e., the mean of the k_{i}
values). The following approach is used to determine the predicted occurrence time.
When \sum_{j=S}^{F}\left(T_{ij}-T_{0}\right) = \overline{k}
(where F \geq S
), it follows that F
is
the predicted occurrence time; when \sum_{j=S}^{F}\left(T_{ij}-T_{0}\right) < \overline{k}
and
\sum_{j=S}^{F+1}\left(T_{ij}-T_{0}\right) > \overline{k}
, the trapezoid method (Ring and Harris, 1983)
is used to determine the predicted occurrence time.
Year |
the years with climate data |
Time.pred |
the predicted occurrence times (day-of-year) in different years |
The entire mean daily temperature data set for the spring of each year should be provided.
Peijian Shi pjshi@njfu.edu.cn, Zhenghong Chen chenzh64@126.com, Jing Tan jmjwyb@163.com, Brady K. Quinn Brady.Quinn@dfo-mpo.gc.ca.
Aono, Y. (1993) Climatological studies on blooming of cherry tree (Prunus yedoensis) by means
of DTS method. Bulletin of the University of Osaka Prefecture. Ser. B, Agriculture and life sciences
45, 155-
192 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Ring, D.R., Harris, M.K. (1983) Predicting pecan nut casebearer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) activity
at College Station, Texas. Environmental Entomology 12, 482-
486. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1093/ee/12.2.482")}
Shi, P., Chen, Z., Reddy, G.V.P., Hui, C., Huang, J., Xiao, M. (2017a) Timing of cherry tree blooming:
Contrasting effects of rising winter low temperatures and early spring temperatures.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 240-
241, 78-
89. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.04.001")}
Shi, P., Fan, M., Reddy, G.V.P. (2017b) Comparison of thermal performance equations in describing
temperature-dependent developmental rates of insects: (III) Phenological applications.
Annals of the Entomological Society of America 110, 558-
564. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1093/aesa/sax063")}
ADD
data(apricotFFD)
data(BJDAT)
X1 <- apricotFFD
X2 <- BJDAT
Year1.val <- X1$Year
Time.val <- X1$Time
Year2.val <- X2$Year
DOY.val <- X2$DOY
Temp.val <- X2$MDT
DOY.ul.val <- 120
S.val <- 65
T0.val <- -0.5
AADD.val <- 235.5282
res2 <- predADD( S = S.val, T0 = T0.val, AADD = AADD.val,
Year2 = Year2.val, DOY = DOY.val, Temp = Temp.val,
DOY.ul = DOY.ul.val )
res2
ind1 <- res2$Year %in% intersect(res2$Year, Year1.val)
ind2 <- Year1.val %in% intersect(res2$Year, Year1.val)
RMSE1 <- sqrt( sum((Time.val[ind2]-res2$Time.pred[ind1])^2) / length(Time.val[ind2]) )
RMSE1
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.