congruency: Mouse-tracking experiment of a memory task

In ssMousetrack: Bayesian State-Space Modeling of Mouse-Tracking Experiments via Stan

Mouse-tracking experiment of a memory task

Description

This dataset contains a subset of data originally presented in Coco & Duran (2016). In this task participants see sentence and scene pairs that varied in plausibility and are requested to classify the pairs as congruent or incongruent. The experimental variables are congruency with two categorical levels (i.e., congruent, incongruent) and plausibility with two categorical levels (i.e., plausible, implausible). Participants have to classify each stimulus as belonging to one of these four levels.

The dataset contains two participants (I=2), each measured along three trials, two categorical variables (Q=2) each with two levels (K=2). The total number of trials is J=12. Mouse-tracking trajectories are raw-data, i.e. they have not been previously pre-processed.

Usage

congruency

Format

A long-format dataframe of 728 observations containing information on the following variables.

sbj

The ID number of participants

trial

The ID number of trials

congruency

A factor of levels congruent, incongruent

plausibility

A factor of levels plausible, implausible

timestep

The ID number of the recorded x-y trajectories

x

The recorded x-trajectories

y

The recorded y-trajectories

Source

Coco, M. I., & Duran, N. D. (2016). When expectancies collide: Action dynamics reveal the interaction between stimulus plausibility and congruency. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23(6), 1920-1931.

ssMousetrack documentation built on April 5, 2023, 5:11 p.m.