Nothing
#' DROPS data set
#'
#' This dataset comes from the European Union project DROPS (DROught-tolerant
#' yielding PlantS). A panel of 256 maize hybrids was grown with two water
#' regimes (irrigated or rainfed), in seven fields in 2012 and 2013,
#' respectively, spread along a climatic transect from western to eastern
#' Europe, plus one site in Chile in 2013. This resulted in 28 experiments
#' defined as the combination of one year, one site and one water regime, with
#' two and three repetitions for rainfed and irrigated treatments, respectively.
#' A detailed environmental characterisation was carried out, with hourly
#' records of micrometeorological data and soil water status, and associated
#' with precise measurement of phenology. Grain yield and its components were
#' measured at the end of the experiment.\cr
#' 10 experiments have been selected from the full data set, two for each of
#' the five main environmental scenarios that were identified in the data. The
#' scenarios have been added to the data as well as a classification of the
#' genotypes in four genetic groups.\cr\cr
#'
#' The data.frame contains the genotypic means (Best Linear Unbiased Estimators,
#' BLUEs), with one value per experiment (Location × year × water regime) per
#' genotype.\cr
#' A data.frame with 2460 rows and 19 columns.\cr
#' \describe{
#' \item{Experiment}{experiments ID described by the three first letters of the
#' city’s name followed by the year of experiment and the water regime with W
#' for watered and R for rain-fed.}
#' \item{parent1}{identifier of donor dent line}
#' \item{Code_ID, Variety_ID, Accession_ID}{identifier of the genotype}
#' \item{geno.panel}{project in which the genetic material was generated}
#' \item{grain.yield}{genotypic mean for yield adjusted at 15\% grain moisture,
#' in ton per hectare (t ha^-1)}
#' \item{grain.number}{genotypic mean for number of grain per square meter}
#' \item{grain.weight}{genotypic mean for individual grain weight in milligram
#' (mg)}
#' \item{anthesis}{genotypic mean for male flowering (pollen shed), in thermal
#' time cumulated since emergence (d_20°C)}
#' \item{silking}{genotypic mean for female flowering (silking emergence), in
#' thermal time cumulated since emergence (d_20°C)}
#' \item{plant.height}{genotypic mean for plant height, from ground level to
#' the base of the flag leaf (highest) leaf in centimeter (cm)}
#' \item{tassel.height}{genotypic mean for plant height including tassel, from
#' ground level to the highest point of the tassel in centimeter (cm)}
#' \item{ear.height}{genotypic mean for ear insertion height, from ground level
#' to ligule of the highest ear leaf in centimeter (cm)}
#' \item{year}{year in which the experiment was performed}
#' \item{loc}{location where the experiment was performed, a three letter
#' abbreviation}
#' \item{scenarioWater}{water scenario for the experiment, well watered (WW) or
#' water deficit (WD)}
#' \item{scenarioTemp}{temperature scenario for the experiment, Cool, Hot or
#' Hot(Day)}
#' \item{scenarioFull}{the full scenario for the experiment, a combination of
#' scenarioWater and scenarioTemp}
#' \item{geneticGroup}{the genetic group to which the genotype belongs}
#' }
#'
#' @source \doi{10.15454/IASSTN}
#'
#' @references Millet, E. J., Pommier, C., et al. (2019). A multi-site
#' experiment in a network of European fields for assessing the maize yield
#' response to environmental scenarios (Data set).
#' \doi{10.15454/IASSTN}
"dropsPheno"
#' Field data for a maize experiment in Tlaltizapan, Mexico
#'
#' A dataset converted into a TD object containing data corresponding to an
#' F2 maize reference population from CIMMYT maize drought breeding program,
#' which was derived from the cross of a drought-tolerant line (P1) with a
#' drought susceptible line (P2) as described in detail by Ribaut et al. (1996,
#' 1997).\cr
#' DNA from 211 F2 plants was extracted to produce information for 132
#' co-dominant markers on 10 linkage groups. Phenotypic evaluations were
#' performed on 211 F2:3 families, each one derived from an original F2 plant.
#' The families were evaluated under different water and nitrogen regimes
#' during 1992, 1994 and 1996. In the winter of 1992 three water regimes were
#' imposed on the trials: well watered (NS), intermediate stress (IS) and severe
#' stress (SS). In the winter of 1994, only the IS and SS trials were available.
#' Nitrogen availability varied in the 1996 trials, with two low nitrogen
#' treatments (LN, in winter and summer) and one high-nitrogen treatment
#' (HN in summer). In each of the trials, five traits were evaluated but only
#' grain yield is included in the data.
#'
#' @format A TD object, a list containing 8 data.frames, each with the following
#' columns:
#' \describe{
#' \item{trial}{trial, a combination of water regime, year and nitrogen
#' treatment}
#' \item{genotype}{genotype}
#' \item{yld}{grain yield in tons}
#' }
#'
#' @source \url{https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00221905}
#'
#' @references Ribaut JM, Hoisington DA, Deutsch JA, Jiang C, Gonzalez de Leon D
#' (1996) Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions in
#' tropical maize.1. Flowering parameters and the anthesis-silking interval.
#' Theor Appl Genet 92:905–914
#' @references Ribaut JM, Jiang C, Gonzalez de Leon D, Edmeades GO, Hoisington
#' DA (1997) Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions
#' in tropical maize.2. Yield components and marker-assisted selection
#' strategies. Theor Appl Genet 94:887–896
"TDMaize"
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.