Description Usage Format Details Source References Examples
Data from the artificial textual tradition Parzival
1 |
A matrix with 139 observations on the following 16 variables.
p1
a numeric vector
p2
a numeric vector
p3
a numeric vector
p4
a numeric vector
p5
a numeric vector
p6
a numeric vector
p7
a numeric vector
p8
a numeric vector
p9
a numeric vector
p10
a numeric vector
p11
a numeric vector
p12
a numeric vector
p13
a numeric vector
p14
a numeric vector
p15
a numeric vector
p16
a numeric vector
The data comes from an artificial tradition, created under controlled circumstances. The variant locations have been selected to retain only substantial readings. The data is presented here as used in Camps & Cafiero 2015, without further modifications or corrections. Readings have been converted to numeric codes (0 being omission, and NA an absence of value).
M. Spencer, E. A. Davidson, A. C. Barbrook, and C. J. Howe. ‘Phylogenetics of artificial manuscripts’. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 227 (2004), p. 503–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.11.022.
Roos, Teemu, Tuomas Heikkilä, and Petri Myllymäki. ‘Computer-Assisted Stemmatology Challenge’. Helsinki, 2007, https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/ttonteri/casc/data.html.
Camps, Jean-Baptiste, and Florian Cafiero. ‘Genealogical Variant Locations and Simplified Stemma: A Test Case’. Analysis of Ancient and Medieval Texts and Manuscripts: Digital Approaches, edited by Tara Andrews and Caroline Macé, Brepols, 2015, pp. 69–93, https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01435633, DOI: 10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.102565.
1 |
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.