Description Usage Format Details Source References Examples
Data from the artificial textual tradition Parzival
1 |
A matrix with 139 observations on the following 16 variables.
p1a numeric vector
p2a numeric vector
p3a numeric vector
p4a numeric vector
p5a numeric vector
p6a numeric vector
p7a numeric vector
p8a numeric vector
p9a numeric vector
p10a numeric vector
p11a numeric vector
p12a numeric vector
p13a numeric vector
p14a numeric vector
p15a numeric vector
p16a numeric vector
The data comes from an artificial tradition, created under controlled circumstances. The variant locations have been selected to retain only substantial readings. The data is presented here as used in Camps & Cafiero 2015, without further modifications or corrections. Readings have been converted to numeric codes (0 being omission, and NA an absence of value).
M. Spencer, E. A. Davidson, A. C. Barbrook, and C. J. Howe. ‘Phylogenetics of artificial manuscripts’. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 227 (2004), p. 503–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.11.022.
Roos, Teemu, Tuomas Heikkilä, and Petri Myllymäki. ‘Computer-Assisted Stemmatology Challenge’. Helsinki, 2007, https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/ttonteri/casc/data.html.
Camps, Jean-Baptiste, and Florian Cafiero. ‘Genealogical Variant Locations and Simplified Stemma: A Test Case’. Analysis of Ancient and Medieval Texts and Manuscripts: Digital Approaches, edited by Tara Andrews and Caroline Macé, Brepols, 2015, pp. 69–93, https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01435633, DOI: 10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.102565.
1 |
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.