Nothing
tests/testthat/_snaps/tables.md
In volker: High-Level Functions for Tabulating, Charting and Reporting Survey Data
Frequency table
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, sd_gender)
Output
|Gender | n| p|
|:-------|---:|----:|
|female | 40| 40%|
|male | 60| 59%|
|diverse | 1| 1%|
|total | 101| 100%|
n=101.
Cross table of categorical variables
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, adopter, sd_gender)
Output
|Innovator type | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-------------------------------------------------|----------:|--------:|--------:|-------:|
|I try new offers immediately | 15% (15)| 2% (2)| 12% (12)| 1% (1)|
|I try new offers rather quickly | 62% (63)| 25% (25)| 38% (38)| 0% (0)|
|I wait until offers establish themselves | 22% (22)| 13% (13)| 9% (9)| 0% (0)|
|I only use new offers when I have no other choice | 1% (1)| 0% (0)| 1% (1)| 0% (0)|
|total | 100% (101)| 40% (40)| 59% (60)| 1% (1)|
n=101.
Cross table of categorical variables with cols
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, adopter, sd_gender, prop = "cols")
Output
|Innovator type | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-------------------------------------------------|----------:|---------:|---------:|--------:|
|I try new offers immediately | 15% (15)| 5% (2)| 20% (12)| 100% (1)|
|I try new offers rather quickly | 62% (63)| 62% (25)| 63% (38)| 0% (0)|
|I wait until offers establish themselves | 22% (22)| 32% (13)| 15% (9)| 0% (0)|
|I only use new offers when I have no other choice | 1% (1)| 0% (0)| 2% (1)| 0% (0)|
|total | 100% (101)| 100% (40)| 100% (60)| 100% (1)|
n=101.
Cross table of categorical variables with percent
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, adopter, sd_gender, values = "p")
Output
|Innovator type | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-------------------------------------------------|-----:|------:|----:|-------:|
|I try new offers immediately | 15%| 2%| 12%| 1%|
|I try new offers rather quickly | 62%| 25%| 38%| 0%|
|I wait until offers establish themselves | 22%| 13%| 9%| 0%|
|I only use new offers when I have no other choice | 1%| 0%| 1%| 0%|
|total | 100%| 40%| 59%| 1%|
n=101.
Cross table of categorical variables with counts
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, adopter, sd_gender, values = "n")
Output
|Innovator type | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-------------------------------------------------|-----:|------:|----:|-------:|
|I try new offers immediately | 15| 2| 12| 1|
|I try new offers rather quickly | 63| 25| 38| 0|
|I wait until offers establish themselves | 22| 13| 9| 0|
|I only use new offers when I have no other choice | 1| 0| 1| 0|
|total | 101| 40| 60| 1|
n=101.
Frequency table for multiple categorical variables
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"))
Output
|Expectations | strongly disagree| disagree| neutral| agree| strongly agree| total|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|--------------:|---------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 6% (6)| 8% (8)| 35% (34)| 36% (35)| 14% (14)| 100% (97)|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 22% (21)| 22% (21)| 30% (29)| 21% (20)| 6% (6)| 100% (97)|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 6% (6)| 10% (10)| 21% (20)| 46% (45)| 16% (16)| 100% (97)|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 6% (6)| 4% (4)| 36% (35)| 39% (38)| 14% (14)| 100% (97)|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 6% (6)| 27% (26)| 32% (31)| 22% (21)| 13% (13)| 100% (97)|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 10% (10)| 19% (18)| 41% (40)| 14% (14)| 15% (15)| 100% (97)|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 3% (3)| 22% (21)| 42% (41)| 19% (18)| 14% (14)| 100% (97)|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 11% (11)| 35% (34)| 29% (28)| 18% (17)| 7% (7)| 100% (97)|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 20% (19)| 34% (33)| 26% (25)| 15% (15)| 5% (5)| 100% (97)|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 27% (26)| 31% (30)| 26% (25)| 10% (10)| 6% (6)| 100% (97)|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 46% (45)| 27% (26)| 14% (14)| 7% (7)| 5% (5)| 100% (97)|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 33% (32)| 27% (26)| 21% (20)| 13% (13)| 6% (6)| 100% (97)|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Frequency table for multiple categorical variables with percent
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), values = "p")
Output
|Expectations | strongly disagree| disagree| neutral| agree| strongly agree| total|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------:|--------:|-------:|-----:|--------------:|-----:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 6%| 8%| 35%| 36%| 14%| 100%|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 22%| 22%| 30%| 21%| 6%| 100%|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 6%| 10%| 21%| 46%| 16%| 100%|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 6%| 4%| 36%| 39%| 14%| 100%|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 6%| 27%| 32%| 22%| 13%| 100%|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 10%| 19%| 41%| 14%| 15%| 100%|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 3%| 22%| 42%| 19%| 14%| 100%|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 11%| 35%| 29%| 18%| 7%| 100%|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 20%| 34%| 26%| 15%| 5%| 100%|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 27%| 31%| 26%| 10%| 6%| 100%|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 46%| 27%| 14%| 7%| 5%| 100%|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 33%| 27%| 21%| 13%| 6%| 100%|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Frequency table for multiple categorical variables with counts
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), values = "n")
Output
|Expectations | strongly disagree| disagree| neutral| agree| strongly agree| total|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------:|--------:|-------:|-----:|--------------:|-----:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 6| 8| 34| 35| 14| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 21| 21| 29| 20| 6| 97|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 6| 10| 20| 45| 16| 97|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 6| 4| 35| 38| 14| 97|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 6| 26| 31| 21| 13| 97|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 10| 18| 40| 14| 15| 97|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 3| 21| 41| 18| 14| 97|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 11| 34| 28| 17| 7| 97|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 19| 33| 25| 15| 5| 97|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 26| 30| 25| 10| 6| 97|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 45| 26| 14| 7| 5| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 32| 26| 20| 13| 6| 97|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Frequency table for multiple categorical variables by grouping variable
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_gender,
category = c("agree", "strongly agree"))
Output
|Expectations | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|--------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 51% (49)| 57% (21)| 46% (27)| 100% (1)|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 27% (26)| 22% (8)| 31% (18)| 0% (0)|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 63% (61)| 68% (25)| 59% (35)| 100% (1)|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 54% (52)| 59% (22)| 51% (30)| 0% (0)|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 35% (34)| 32% (12)| 37% (22)| 0% (0)|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 30% (29)| 22% (8)| 36% (21)| 0% (0)|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 33% (32)| 24% (9)| 39% (23)| 0% (0)|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 25% (24)| 16% (6)| 29% (17)| 100% (1)|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 21% (20)| 14% (5)| 24% (14)| 100% (1)|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 16% (16)| 16% (6)| 15% (9)| 100% (1)|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 12% (12)| 3% (1)| 17% (10)| 100% (1)|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 20% (19)| 16% (6)| 22% (13)| 0% (0)|
Frequencies based on values: agree, strongly agree. 4 missing case(s) omitted.
Frequency table for multiple categorical variables by binary grouping variable
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_advantage"),
sd_gender, cran = TRUE)
Output
|cg_adoption_advantage_0 | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-----------------------|--------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|
|1 | 50% (51)| 57% (23)| 45% (27)| 100% (1)|
|2 | 28% (28)| 25% (10)| 30% (18)| 0% (0)|
|3 | 63% (64)| 68% (27)| 60% (36)| 100% (1)|
|4 | 54% (55)| 62% (25)| 50% (30)| 0% (0)|
Frequencies based on values: TRUE.
Distribution table for age
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, sd_age)
Output
|Age | value|
|:------|-----:|
|min | 18|
|q1 | 27|
|median | 38|
|q3 | 52|
|max | 68|
|mean | 39.7|
|sd | 13.8|
|n | 101|
Distribution table for age with ci
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, sd_age, ci = TRUE)
Output
|Age | value|
|:-------|-----:|
|min | 18|
|q1 | 27|
|median | 38|
|q3 | 52|
|max | 68|
|mean | 39.7|
|sd | 13.8|
|ci low | 37|
|ci high | 42.4|
|n | 101|
Group comparison of a metric variable
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, sd_age, sd_gender)
Output
|Gender | min| q1| median| q3| max| mean| sd| n|
|:-------|---:|----:|------:|----:|---:|----:|----:|---:|
|female | 18| 25.8| 38.0| 44.2| 63| 37.5| 13.4| 40|
|male | 19| 32.5| 38.5| 52.0| 68| 41.2| 14.0| 60|
|diverse | 33| 33.0| 33.0| 33.0| 33| 33.0| | 1|
|total | 18| 27.0| 38.0| 52.0| 68| 39.7| 13.8| 101|
Correlations with two variables
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, use_work, use_private, metric = TRUE)
Output
|Item 1 | Item 2| n| Pearson's r|
|:-----------------------|------------------:|---:|-----------:|
|in professional context | in private context| 101| 0.37|
Correlations with two variables with no common prefix
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, sd_age, use_private, metric = TRUE)
Output
|Item 1 | Item 2| n| Pearson's r|
|:------|-------------------------:|---:|-----------:|
|Age | Usage: in private context| 101| -0.19|
Correlation with two variables and ci
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, use_work, use_private, metric = TRUE, ci = TRUE)
Output
|Item 1 | Item 2| n| Pearson's r| ci low| ci high|
|:-----------------------|------------------:|---:|-----------:|------:|-------:|
|in professional context | in private context| 101| 0.37| 0.19| 0.53|
Correlation with two variables and spearman
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, use_work, use_private, metric = TRUE, method = "spearman")
Output
|Item 1 | Item 2| n| Spearman's rho|
|:-----------------------|------------------:|---:|--------------:|
|in professional context | in private context| 101| 0.33|
Distribution table for multiple metric items
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"))
Output
|Expectations | min| q1| median| q3| max| mean| sd| n|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|---:|--:|------:|--:|---:|----:|---:|--:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.4| 1.0| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 2.7| 1.2| 97|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.6| 1.1| 97|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.5| 1.0| 97|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 3.1| 1.1| 97|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 3.1| 1.2| 97|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 1| 3| 3| 4| 5| 3.2| 1.0| 97|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 1| 2| 3| 3| 5| 2.7| 1.1| 97|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 1| 2| 2| 3| 5| 2.5| 1.1| 97|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.4| 1.2| 97|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.0| 1.2| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.3| 1.2| 97|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Distribution table for multiple metric items with ci
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), ci = TRUE)
Output
|Expectations | min| q1| median| q3| max| mean| sd| ci low| ci high| n|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|---:|--:|------:|--:|---:|----:|---:|------:|-------:|--:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.4| 1.0| 3.2| 3.7| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 2.7| 1.2| 2.4| 2.9| 97|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.6| 1.1| 3.3| 3.8| 97|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.5| 1.0| 3.3| 3.7| 97|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 3.1| 1.1| 2.9| 3.3| 97|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 3.1| 1.2| 2.8| 3.3| 97|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 1| 3| 3| 4| 5| 3.2| 1.0| 3.0| 3.4| 97|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 1| 2| 3| 3| 5| 2.7| 1.1| 2.5| 3.0| 97|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 1| 2| 2| 3| 5| 2.5| 1.1| 2.3| 2.8| 97|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.4| 1.2| 2.1| 2.6| 97|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.0| 1.2| 1.7| 2.2| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.3| 1.2| 2.1| 2.6| 97|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Compare means of multiple items with and without common prefix
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_gender)
Output
|Expectations | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|---------:|---------:|---------:|--------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 3.4 (1.0)| 3.6 (1.0)| 3.3 (1.0)| 4.0 (NA)|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 2.7 (1.2)| 2.6 (1.2)| 2.7 (1.2)| 3.0 (NA)|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 3.6 (1.1)| 3.7 (1.0)| 3.5 (1.1)| 4.0 (NA)|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 3.5 (1.0)| 3.6 (1.0)| 3.5 (1.0)| 3.0 (NA)|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 3.1 (1.1)| 3.1 (1.0)| 3.1 (1.2)| 3.0 (NA)|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 3.1 (1.2)| 3.0 (1.0)| 3.1 (1.3)| 3.0 (NA)|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 3.2 (1.0)| 3.0 (1.0)| 3.3 (1.1)| 3.0 (NA)|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 2.7 (1.1)| 2.5 (0.9)| 2.8 (1.2)| 4.0 (NA)|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 2.5 (1.1)| 2.5 (0.9)| 2.5 (1.3)| 4.0 (NA)|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 2.4 (1.2)| 2.4 (1.0)| 2.3 (1.3)| 4.0 (NA)|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 2.0 (1.2)| 1.8 (1.0)| 2.1 (1.3)| 4.0 (NA)|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 2.3 (1.2)| 2.4 (1.2)| 2.3 (1.3)| 3.0 (NA)|
|n | 97| 37| 59| 1|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, c("sd_age", "use_work"), sd_gender)
Output
|Item | total| female| male| diverse|
|:------------------------------|-----------:|-----------:|-----------:|---------:|
|Age | 39.7 (13.8)| 37.5 (13.4)| 41.2 (14.0)| 33.0 (NA)|
|Usage: in professional context | 2.4 ( 1.4)| 2.5 ( 1.6)| 2.3 ( 1.3)| 4.0 (NA)|
|n | 101| 40| 60| 1|
Compare means of multiple items with sd or mean
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_gender,
values = "sd")
Output
|Expectations | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----:|------:|----:|-------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 1.0| 1.0| 1.0| |
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 1.2| 1.2| 1.2| |
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 1.1| 1.0| 1.1| |
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 1.0| 1.0| 1.0| |
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 1.1| 1.0| 1.2| |
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 1.2| 1.0| 1.3| |
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 1.0| 1.0| 1.1| |
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 1.1| 0.9| 1.2| |
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 1.1| 0.9| 1.3| |
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 1.2| 1.0| 1.3| |
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 1.2| 1.0| 1.3| |
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 1.2| 1.2| 1.3| |
|n | 97.0| 37.0| 59.0| 1|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_gender,
values = "m")
Output
|Expectations | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----:|------:|----:|-------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 3.4| 3.6| 3.3| 4|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 2.7| 2.6| 2.7| 3|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 3.6| 3.7| 3.5| 4|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 3.5| 3.6| 3.5| 3|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 3.1| 3.1| 3.1| 3|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 3.1| 3.0| 3.1| 3|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 3.2| 3.0| 3.3| 3|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 2.7| 2.5| 2.8| 4|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 2.5| 2.5| 2.5| 4|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 2.4| 2.4| 2.3| 4|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 2.0| 1.8| 2.1| 4|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 2.3| 2.4| 2.3| 3|
|n | 97.0| 37.0| 59.0| 1|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Correlations of an item battery with one variable
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_age,
metric = TRUE)
Output
|Expectations | Age|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | -0.12|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | -0.13|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | -0.09|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | -0.12|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 0.18|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 0.24|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | -0.10|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 0.02|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | -0.17|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | -0.06|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 0.09|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | -0.02|
n=97. 4 missing case(s) omitted.
Correlations of an item battery with one variable and spearman
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_age,
metric = TRUE, method = "spearman")
Output
|Expectations | Age|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | -0.14|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | -0.14|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | -0.13|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | -0.14|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 0.17|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 0.26|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | -0.12|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 0.01|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | -0.16|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | -0.07|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 0.12|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | -0.01|
n=97. 4 missing case(s) omitted.
Correlate two item batteries
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), tidyselect::starts_with(
"use_"), metric = TRUE)
Output
|Expectations | Usage| Pearson's r|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------:|-----------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in private context| 0.50|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in professional context| 0.28|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in private context| 0.21|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in professional context| 0.54|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in private context| 0.37|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in professional context| 0.37|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in private context| 0.47|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in professional context| 0.29|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | in private context| -0.24|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | in professional context| -0.09|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.08|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.31|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.02|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.20|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | in private context| -0.09|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | in professional context| 0.15|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | in private context| 0.40|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | in professional context| 0.58|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.47|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.55|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | in private context| 0.34|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | in professional context| 0.34|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | in private context| 0.42|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | in professional context| 0.46|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), tidyselect::starts_with(
"cg_adoption_"), metric = TRUE)
Output
|Item 1: Expectations | Item 2: Expectations| Pearson's r|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------:|-----------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 1.00|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.37|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.64|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.61|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| -0.14|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.19|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.07|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.01|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.21|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.28|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.16|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.27|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.37|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 1.00|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.46|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.42|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.02|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.34|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.34|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.22|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.54|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.50|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.36|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.40|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.64|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.46|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 1.00|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.47|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| -0.11|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.19|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.06|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.09|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.33|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.34|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.13|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.31|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.61|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.42|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.47|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 1.00|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| -0.19|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.17|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.14|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| -0.07|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.33|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.26|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.20|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.36|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| -0.14|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.02|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| -0.11|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| -0.19|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 1.00|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.29|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.36|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.48|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| -0.19|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.04|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.10|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| -0.07|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.19|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.34|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.19|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.17|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.29|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 1.00|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.38|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.28|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.23|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.22|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.33|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.30|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.07|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.34|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.06|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.14|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.36|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.38|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 1.00|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.39|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.06|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.20|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.29|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.10|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.01|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.22|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.09|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| -0.07|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.48|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.28|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.39|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 1.00|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.25|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.22|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.25|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.14|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.21|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.54|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.33|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.33|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| -0.19|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.23|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.06|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.25|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 1.00|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.73|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.48|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.57|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.28|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.50|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.34|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.26|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.04|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.22|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.20|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.22|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.73|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 1.00|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.58|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.54|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.16|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.36|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.13|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.20|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.10|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.33|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.29|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.25|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.48|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.58|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 1.00|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.56|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.27|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.40|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.31|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.36|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| -0.07|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.30|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.10|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.14|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.57|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.54|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.56|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 1.00|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Correlate two item batteries with ci
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, starts_with("cg_adoption_adv"), starts_with("use_"),
metric = TRUE, ci = T)
Output
|Expectations | Usage| Pearson's r| ci low| ci high|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------:|-----------:|------:|-------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in private context| 0.50| 0.33| 0.63|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in professional context| 0.27| 0.07| 0.44|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in private context| 0.17| -0.03| 0.36|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in professional context| 0.53| 0.37| 0.66|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in private context| 0.34| 0.16| 0.51|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in professional context| 0.35| 0.17| 0.51|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in private context| 0.47| 0.30| 0.61|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in professional context| 0.27| 0.07| 0.44|
2 missing case(s) omitted.
Correlate two item batteries with spearman
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), tidyselect::starts_with(
"use_"), metric = TRUE, method = "spearman", )
Output
|Expectations | Usage| Spearman's rho|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------:|--------------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in private context| 0.47|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in professional context| 0.24|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in private context| 0.18|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in professional context| 0.53|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in private context| 0.36|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in professional context| 0.33|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in private context| 0.44|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in professional context| 0.30|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | in private context| -0.24|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | in professional context| -0.09|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.04|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.30|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.01|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.19|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | in private context| -0.16|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | in professional context| 0.13|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | in private context| 0.34|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | in professional context| 0.57|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.42|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.52|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | in private context| 0.26|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | in professional context| 0.30|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | in private context| 0.36|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | in professional context| 0.40|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Missing values make no trouble
Code
.
Output
|cg_adoption | total| diverse| female| male|
|:------------|---------:|--------:|---------:|---------:|
|advantage_01 | 3.2 (2.0)| 4.0 (NA)| 3.3 (2.2)| 3.1 (1.9)|
|advantage_02 | 2.7 (1.2)| 3.0 (NA)| 2.6 (1.3)| 2.7 (1.2)|
|advantage_03 | 3.6 (1.1)| 4.0 (NA)| 3.7 (1.0)| 3.5 (1.1)|
|advantage_04 | 3.5 (1.0)| 3.0 (NA)| 3.6 (1.0)| 3.5 (1.0)|
|fearofuse_01 | 3.1 (1.1)| 3.0 (NA)| 3.2 (1.0)| 3.1 (1.2)|
|fearofuse_02 | 3.1 (1.2)| 3.0 (NA)| 3.0 (1.0)| 3.1 (1.3)|
|fearofuse_03 | 3.1 (1.6)| 3.0 (NA)| 2.8 (2.1)| 3.3 (1.1)|
|fearofuse_04 | 2.7 (1.1)| 4.0 (NA)| 2.5 (0.9)| 2.8 (1.2)|
|social_01 | 2.4 (1.6)| 4.0 (NA)| 2.2 (2.0)| 2.5 (1.2)|
|social_02 | 2.4 (1.2)| 4.0 (NA)| 2.3 (1.0)| 2.4 (1.2)|
|social_03 | 1.9 (1.6)| 4.0 (NA)| 1.6 (2.0)| 2.0 (1.2)|
|social_04 | 2.3 (1.2)| 3.0 (NA)| 2.4 (1.2)| 2.3 (1.3)|
|n | 101| 1| 40| 60|
3 missing case(s) omitted.
Item order is kept
Code
tab_counts_items(tibble::tribble(~f1, ~f2, ~f10, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2), c(
f1:f10))
Output
|f | 1| 2| total|
|:--|-------:|-------:|--------:|
|1 | 67% (2)| 33% (1)| 100% (3)|
|2 | 33% (1)| 67% (2)| 100% (3)|
|10 | 67% (2)| 33% (1)| 100% (3)|
Values are relabeled
Code
data %>% dplyr::filter(sd_gender != "diverse") %>% volker::labs_apply(cols = sd_gender,
values = list(female = "Weiblich", male = "Maennlich")) %>% volker::tab_metrics(
sd_age, sd_gender)
Output
|Gender | min| q1| median| q3| max| mean| sd| n|
|:---------|---:|----:|------:|----:|---:|----:|----:|---:|
|Weiblich | 18| 25.8| 38.0| 44.2| 63| 37.5| 13.4| 40|
|Maennlich | 19| 32.5| 38.5| 52.0| 68| 41.2| 14.0| 60|
|total | 18| 27.0| 38.0| 52.0| 68| 39.7| 13.8| 100|
Try the volker package in your browser
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
volker documentation built on April 12, 2025, 9:16 a.m.
R Package Documentation
Browse R Packages
We want your feedback!
Note that we can't provide technical support on individual packages. You should contact the package authors for that.
Frequency table
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, sd_gender)
Output
|Gender | n| p|
|:-------|---:|----:|
|female | 40| 40%|
|male | 60| 59%|
|diverse | 1| 1%|
|total | 101| 100%|
n=101.
Cross table of categorical variables
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, adopter, sd_gender)
Output
|Innovator type | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-------------------------------------------------|----------:|--------:|--------:|-------:|
|I try new offers immediately | 15% (15)| 2% (2)| 12% (12)| 1% (1)|
|I try new offers rather quickly | 62% (63)| 25% (25)| 38% (38)| 0% (0)|
|I wait until offers establish themselves | 22% (22)| 13% (13)| 9% (9)| 0% (0)|
|I only use new offers when I have no other choice | 1% (1)| 0% (0)| 1% (1)| 0% (0)|
|total | 100% (101)| 40% (40)| 59% (60)| 1% (1)|
n=101.
Cross table of categorical variables with cols
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, adopter, sd_gender, prop = "cols")
Output
|Innovator type | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-------------------------------------------------|----------:|---------:|---------:|--------:|
|I try new offers immediately | 15% (15)| 5% (2)| 20% (12)| 100% (1)|
|I try new offers rather quickly | 62% (63)| 62% (25)| 63% (38)| 0% (0)|
|I wait until offers establish themselves | 22% (22)| 32% (13)| 15% (9)| 0% (0)|
|I only use new offers when I have no other choice | 1% (1)| 0% (0)| 2% (1)| 0% (0)|
|total | 100% (101)| 100% (40)| 100% (60)| 100% (1)|
n=101.
Cross table of categorical variables with percent
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, adopter, sd_gender, values = "p")
Output
|Innovator type | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-------------------------------------------------|-----:|------:|----:|-------:|
|I try new offers immediately | 15%| 2%| 12%| 1%|
|I try new offers rather quickly | 62%| 25%| 38%| 0%|
|I wait until offers establish themselves | 22%| 13%| 9%| 0%|
|I only use new offers when I have no other choice | 1%| 0%| 1%| 0%|
|total | 100%| 40%| 59%| 1%|
n=101.
Cross table of categorical variables with counts
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, adopter, sd_gender, values = "n")
Output
|Innovator type | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-------------------------------------------------|-----:|------:|----:|-------:|
|I try new offers immediately | 15| 2| 12| 1|
|I try new offers rather quickly | 63| 25| 38| 0|
|I wait until offers establish themselves | 22| 13| 9| 0|
|I only use new offers when I have no other choice | 1| 0| 1| 0|
|total | 101| 40| 60| 1|
n=101.
Frequency table for multiple categorical variables
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"))
Output
|Expectations | strongly disagree| disagree| neutral| agree| strongly agree| total|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|--------------:|---------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 6% (6)| 8% (8)| 35% (34)| 36% (35)| 14% (14)| 100% (97)|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 22% (21)| 22% (21)| 30% (29)| 21% (20)| 6% (6)| 100% (97)|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 6% (6)| 10% (10)| 21% (20)| 46% (45)| 16% (16)| 100% (97)|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 6% (6)| 4% (4)| 36% (35)| 39% (38)| 14% (14)| 100% (97)|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 6% (6)| 27% (26)| 32% (31)| 22% (21)| 13% (13)| 100% (97)|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 10% (10)| 19% (18)| 41% (40)| 14% (14)| 15% (15)| 100% (97)|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 3% (3)| 22% (21)| 42% (41)| 19% (18)| 14% (14)| 100% (97)|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 11% (11)| 35% (34)| 29% (28)| 18% (17)| 7% (7)| 100% (97)|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 20% (19)| 34% (33)| 26% (25)| 15% (15)| 5% (5)| 100% (97)|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 27% (26)| 31% (30)| 26% (25)| 10% (10)| 6% (6)| 100% (97)|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 46% (45)| 27% (26)| 14% (14)| 7% (7)| 5% (5)| 100% (97)|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 33% (32)| 27% (26)| 21% (20)| 13% (13)| 6% (6)| 100% (97)|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Frequency table for multiple categorical variables with percent
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), values = "p")
Output
|Expectations | strongly disagree| disagree| neutral| agree| strongly agree| total|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------:|--------:|-------:|-----:|--------------:|-----:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 6%| 8%| 35%| 36%| 14%| 100%|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 22%| 22%| 30%| 21%| 6%| 100%|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 6%| 10%| 21%| 46%| 16%| 100%|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 6%| 4%| 36%| 39%| 14%| 100%|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 6%| 27%| 32%| 22%| 13%| 100%|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 10%| 19%| 41%| 14%| 15%| 100%|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 3%| 22%| 42%| 19%| 14%| 100%|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 11%| 35%| 29%| 18%| 7%| 100%|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 20%| 34%| 26%| 15%| 5%| 100%|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 27%| 31%| 26%| 10%| 6%| 100%|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 46%| 27%| 14%| 7%| 5%| 100%|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 33%| 27%| 21%| 13%| 6%| 100%|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Frequency table for multiple categorical variables with counts
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), values = "n")
Output
|Expectations | strongly disagree| disagree| neutral| agree| strongly agree| total|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------:|--------:|-------:|-----:|--------------:|-----:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 6| 8| 34| 35| 14| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 21| 21| 29| 20| 6| 97|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 6| 10| 20| 45| 16| 97|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 6| 4| 35| 38| 14| 97|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 6| 26| 31| 21| 13| 97|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 10| 18| 40| 14| 15| 97|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 3| 21| 41| 18| 14| 97|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 11| 34| 28| 17| 7| 97|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 19| 33| 25| 15| 5| 97|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 26| 30| 25| 10| 6| 97|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 45| 26| 14| 7| 5| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 32| 26| 20| 13| 6| 97|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Frequency table for multiple categorical variables by grouping variable
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_gender,
category = c("agree", "strongly agree"))
Output
|Expectations | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|--------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 51% (49)| 57% (21)| 46% (27)| 100% (1)|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 27% (26)| 22% (8)| 31% (18)| 0% (0)|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 63% (61)| 68% (25)| 59% (35)| 100% (1)|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 54% (52)| 59% (22)| 51% (30)| 0% (0)|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 35% (34)| 32% (12)| 37% (22)| 0% (0)|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 30% (29)| 22% (8)| 36% (21)| 0% (0)|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 33% (32)| 24% (9)| 39% (23)| 0% (0)|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 25% (24)| 16% (6)| 29% (17)| 100% (1)|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 21% (20)| 14% (5)| 24% (14)| 100% (1)|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 16% (16)| 16% (6)| 15% (9)| 100% (1)|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 12% (12)| 3% (1)| 17% (10)| 100% (1)|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 20% (19)| 16% (6)| 22% (13)| 0% (0)|
Frequencies based on values: agree, strongly agree. 4 missing case(s) omitted.
Frequency table for multiple categorical variables by binary grouping variable
Code
volker::tab_counts(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_advantage"),
sd_gender, cran = TRUE)
Output
|cg_adoption_advantage_0 | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-----------------------|--------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|
|1 | 50% (51)| 57% (23)| 45% (27)| 100% (1)|
|2 | 28% (28)| 25% (10)| 30% (18)| 0% (0)|
|3 | 63% (64)| 68% (27)| 60% (36)| 100% (1)|
|4 | 54% (55)| 62% (25)| 50% (30)| 0% (0)|
Frequencies based on values: TRUE.
Distribution table for age
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, sd_age)
Output
|Age | value|
|:------|-----:|
|min | 18|
|q1 | 27|
|median | 38|
|q3 | 52|
|max | 68|
|mean | 39.7|
|sd | 13.8|
|n | 101|
Distribution table for age with ci
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, sd_age, ci = TRUE)
Output
|Age | value|
|:-------|-----:|
|min | 18|
|q1 | 27|
|median | 38|
|q3 | 52|
|max | 68|
|mean | 39.7|
|sd | 13.8|
|ci low | 37|
|ci high | 42.4|
|n | 101|
Group comparison of a metric variable
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, sd_age, sd_gender)
Output
|Gender | min| q1| median| q3| max| mean| sd| n|
|:-------|---:|----:|------:|----:|---:|----:|----:|---:|
|female | 18| 25.8| 38.0| 44.2| 63| 37.5| 13.4| 40|
|male | 19| 32.5| 38.5| 52.0| 68| 41.2| 14.0| 60|
|diverse | 33| 33.0| 33.0| 33.0| 33| 33.0| | 1|
|total | 18| 27.0| 38.0| 52.0| 68| 39.7| 13.8| 101|
Correlations with two variables
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, use_work, use_private, metric = TRUE)
Output
|Item 1 | Item 2| n| Pearson's r|
|:-----------------------|------------------:|---:|-----------:|
|in professional context | in private context| 101| 0.37|
Correlations with two variables with no common prefix
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, sd_age, use_private, metric = TRUE)
Output
|Item 1 | Item 2| n| Pearson's r|
|:------|-------------------------:|---:|-----------:|
|Age | Usage: in private context| 101| -0.19|
Correlation with two variables and ci
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, use_work, use_private, metric = TRUE, ci = TRUE)
Output
|Item 1 | Item 2| n| Pearson's r| ci low| ci high|
|:-----------------------|------------------:|---:|-----------:|------:|-------:|
|in professional context | in private context| 101| 0.37| 0.19| 0.53|
Correlation with two variables and spearman
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, use_work, use_private, metric = TRUE, method = "spearman")
Output
|Item 1 | Item 2| n| Spearman's rho|
|:-----------------------|------------------:|---:|--------------:|
|in professional context | in private context| 101| 0.33|
Distribution table for multiple metric items
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"))
Output
|Expectations | min| q1| median| q3| max| mean| sd| n|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|---:|--:|------:|--:|---:|----:|---:|--:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.4| 1.0| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 2.7| 1.2| 97|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.6| 1.1| 97|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.5| 1.0| 97|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 3.1| 1.1| 97|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 3.1| 1.2| 97|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 1| 3| 3| 4| 5| 3.2| 1.0| 97|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 1| 2| 3| 3| 5| 2.7| 1.1| 97|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 1| 2| 2| 3| 5| 2.5| 1.1| 97|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.4| 1.2| 97|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.0| 1.2| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.3| 1.2| 97|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Distribution table for multiple metric items with ci
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), ci = TRUE)
Output
|Expectations | min| q1| median| q3| max| mean| sd| ci low| ci high| n|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|---:|--:|------:|--:|---:|----:|---:|------:|-------:|--:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.4| 1.0| 3.2| 3.7| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 2.7| 1.2| 2.4| 2.9| 97|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.6| 1.1| 3.3| 3.8| 97|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 1| 3| 4| 4| 5| 3.5| 1.0| 3.3| 3.7| 97|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 3.1| 1.1| 2.9| 3.3| 97|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 3.1| 1.2| 2.8| 3.3| 97|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 1| 3| 3| 4| 5| 3.2| 1.0| 3.0| 3.4| 97|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 1| 2| 3| 3| 5| 2.7| 1.1| 2.5| 3.0| 97|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 1| 2| 2| 3| 5| 2.5| 1.1| 2.3| 2.8| 97|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.4| 1.2| 2.1| 2.6| 97|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.0| 1.2| 1.7| 2.2| 97|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 1| 1| 2| 3| 5| 2.3| 1.2| 2.1| 2.6| 97|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Compare means of multiple items with and without common prefix
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_gender)
Output
|Expectations | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|---------:|---------:|---------:|--------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 3.4 (1.0)| 3.6 (1.0)| 3.3 (1.0)| 4.0 (NA)|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 2.7 (1.2)| 2.6 (1.2)| 2.7 (1.2)| 3.0 (NA)|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 3.6 (1.1)| 3.7 (1.0)| 3.5 (1.1)| 4.0 (NA)|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 3.5 (1.0)| 3.6 (1.0)| 3.5 (1.0)| 3.0 (NA)|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 3.1 (1.1)| 3.1 (1.0)| 3.1 (1.2)| 3.0 (NA)|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 3.1 (1.2)| 3.0 (1.0)| 3.1 (1.3)| 3.0 (NA)|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 3.2 (1.0)| 3.0 (1.0)| 3.3 (1.1)| 3.0 (NA)|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 2.7 (1.1)| 2.5 (0.9)| 2.8 (1.2)| 4.0 (NA)|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 2.5 (1.1)| 2.5 (0.9)| 2.5 (1.3)| 4.0 (NA)|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 2.4 (1.2)| 2.4 (1.0)| 2.3 (1.3)| 4.0 (NA)|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 2.0 (1.2)| 1.8 (1.0)| 2.1 (1.3)| 4.0 (NA)|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 2.3 (1.2)| 2.4 (1.2)| 2.3 (1.3)| 3.0 (NA)|
|n | 97| 37| 59| 1|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, c("sd_age", "use_work"), sd_gender)
Output
|Item | total| female| male| diverse|
|:------------------------------|-----------:|-----------:|-----------:|---------:|
|Age | 39.7 (13.8)| 37.5 (13.4)| 41.2 (14.0)| 33.0 (NA)|
|Usage: in professional context | 2.4 ( 1.4)| 2.5 ( 1.6)| 2.3 ( 1.3)| 4.0 (NA)|
|n | 101| 40| 60| 1|
Compare means of multiple items with sd or mean
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_gender,
values = "sd")
Output
|Expectations | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----:|------:|----:|-------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 1.0| 1.0| 1.0| |
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 1.2| 1.2| 1.2| |
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 1.1| 1.0| 1.1| |
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 1.0| 1.0| 1.0| |
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 1.1| 1.0| 1.2| |
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 1.2| 1.0| 1.3| |
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 1.0| 1.0| 1.1| |
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 1.1| 0.9| 1.2| |
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 1.1| 0.9| 1.3| |
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 1.2| 1.0| 1.3| |
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 1.2| 1.0| 1.3| |
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 1.2| 1.2| 1.3| |
|n | 97.0| 37.0| 59.0| 1|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_gender,
values = "m")
Output
|Expectations | total| female| male| diverse|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----:|------:|----:|-------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | 3.4| 3.6| 3.3| 4|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | 2.7| 2.6| 2.7| 3|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | 3.6| 3.7| 3.5| 4|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | 3.5| 3.6| 3.5| 3|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 3.1| 3.1| 3.1| 3|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 3.1| 3.0| 3.1| 3|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | 3.2| 3.0| 3.3| 3|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 2.7| 2.5| 2.8| 4|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | 2.5| 2.5| 2.5| 4|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | 2.4| 2.4| 2.3| 4|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 2.0| 1.8| 2.1| 4|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | 2.3| 2.4| 2.3| 3|
|n | 97.0| 37.0| 59.0| 1|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Correlations of an item battery with one variable
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_age,
metric = TRUE)
Output
|Expectations | Age|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | -0.12|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | -0.13|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | -0.09|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | -0.12|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 0.18|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 0.24|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | -0.10|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 0.02|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | -0.17|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | -0.06|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 0.09|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | -0.02|
n=97. 4 missing case(s) omitted.
Correlations of an item battery with one variable and spearman
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), sd_age,
metric = TRUE, method = "spearman")
Output
|Expectations | Age|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | -0.14|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | -0.14|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | -0.13|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | -0.14|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | 0.17|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | 0.26|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | -0.12|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | 0.01|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | -0.16|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | -0.07|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | 0.12|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | -0.01|
n=97. 4 missing case(s) omitted.
Correlate two item batteries
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), tidyselect::starts_with(
"use_"), metric = TRUE)
Output
|Expectations | Usage| Pearson's r|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------:|-----------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in private context| 0.50|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in professional context| 0.28|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in private context| 0.21|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in professional context| 0.54|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in private context| 0.37|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in professional context| 0.37|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in private context| 0.47|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in professional context| 0.29|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | in private context| -0.24|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | in professional context| -0.09|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.08|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.31|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.02|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.20|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | in private context| -0.09|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | in professional context| 0.15|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | in private context| 0.40|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | in professional context| 0.58|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.47|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.55|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | in private context| 0.34|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | in professional context| 0.34|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | in private context| 0.42|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | in professional context| 0.46|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), tidyselect::starts_with(
"cg_adoption_"), metric = TRUE)
Output
|Item 1: Expectations | Item 2: Expectations| Pearson's r|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------:|-----------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 1.00|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.37|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.64|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.61|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| -0.14|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.19|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.07|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.01|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.21|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.28|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.16|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.27|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.37|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 1.00|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.46|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.42|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.02|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.34|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.34|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.22|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.54|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.50|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.36|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.40|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.64|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.46|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 1.00|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.47|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| -0.11|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.19|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.06|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.09|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.33|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.34|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.13|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.31|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.61|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.42|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.47|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 1.00|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| -0.19|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.17|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.14|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| -0.07|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.33|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.26|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.20|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.36|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| -0.14|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.02|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| -0.11|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| -0.19|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 1.00|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.29|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.36|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.48|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| -0.19|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.04|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.10|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| -0.07|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.19|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.34|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.19|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.17|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.29|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 1.00|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.38|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.28|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.23|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.22|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.33|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.30|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.07|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.34|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.06|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.14|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.36|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.38|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 1.00|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.39|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.06|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.20|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.29|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.10|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.01|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.22|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.09|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| -0.07|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.48|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.28|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.39|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 1.00|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.25|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.22|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.25|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.14|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.21|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.54|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.33|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.33|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| -0.19|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.23|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.06|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.25|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 1.00|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.73|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.48|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.57|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.28|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.50|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.34|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.26|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.04|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.22|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.20|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.22|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.73|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 1.00|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.58|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.54|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.16|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.36|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.13|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.20|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| 0.10|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.33|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.29|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.25|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.48|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.58|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 1.00|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 0.56|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings.| 0.27|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.| 0.40|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.| 0.31|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.| 0.36|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.| -0.07|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.| 0.30|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.| 0.10|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.| 0.14|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.| 0.57|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.| 0.54|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.| 0.56|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.| 1.00|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Correlate two item batteries with ci
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, starts_with("cg_adoption_adv"), starts_with("use_"),
metric = TRUE, ci = T)
Output
|Expectations | Usage| Pearson's r| ci low| ci high|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------:|-----------:|------:|-------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in private context| 0.50| 0.33| 0.63|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in professional context| 0.27| 0.07| 0.44|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in private context| 0.17| -0.03| 0.36|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in professional context| 0.53| 0.37| 0.66|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in private context| 0.34| 0.16| 0.51|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in professional context| 0.35| 0.17| 0.51|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in private context| 0.47| 0.30| 0.61|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in professional context| 0.27| 0.07| 0.44|
2 missing case(s) omitted.
Correlate two item batteries with spearman
Code
volker::tab_metrics(data, tidyselect::starts_with("cg_adoption_"), tidyselect::starts_with(
"use_"), metric = TRUE, method = "spearman", )
Output
|Expectations | Usage| Spearman's rho|
|:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------:|--------------:|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in private context| 0.47|
|ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. | in professional context| 0.24|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in private context| 0.18|
|Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits. | in professional context| 0.53|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in private context| 0.36|
|Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks. | in professional context| 0.33|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in private context| 0.44|
|Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun. | in professional context| 0.30|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | in private context| -0.24|
|Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT. | in professional context| -0.09|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.04|
|There are legal issues with using ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.30|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.01|
|The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.19|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | in private context| -0.16|
|Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages. | in professional context| 0.13|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | in private context| 0.34|
|In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard. | in professional context| 0.57|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | in private context| 0.42|
|Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT. | in professional context| 0.52|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | in private context| 0.26|
|Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider. | in professional context| 0.30|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | in private context| 0.36|
|Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment. | in professional context| 0.40|
4 missing case(s) omitted.
Missing values make no trouble
Code
.
Output
|cg_adoption | total| diverse| female| male|
|:------------|---------:|--------:|---------:|---------:|
|advantage_01 | 3.2 (2.0)| 4.0 (NA)| 3.3 (2.2)| 3.1 (1.9)|
|advantage_02 | 2.7 (1.2)| 3.0 (NA)| 2.6 (1.3)| 2.7 (1.2)|
|advantage_03 | 3.6 (1.1)| 4.0 (NA)| 3.7 (1.0)| 3.5 (1.1)|
|advantage_04 | 3.5 (1.0)| 3.0 (NA)| 3.6 (1.0)| 3.5 (1.0)|
|fearofuse_01 | 3.1 (1.1)| 3.0 (NA)| 3.2 (1.0)| 3.1 (1.2)|
|fearofuse_02 | 3.1 (1.2)| 3.0 (NA)| 3.0 (1.0)| 3.1 (1.3)|
|fearofuse_03 | 3.1 (1.6)| 3.0 (NA)| 2.8 (2.1)| 3.3 (1.1)|
|fearofuse_04 | 2.7 (1.1)| 4.0 (NA)| 2.5 (0.9)| 2.8 (1.2)|
|social_01 | 2.4 (1.6)| 4.0 (NA)| 2.2 (2.0)| 2.5 (1.2)|
|social_02 | 2.4 (1.2)| 4.0 (NA)| 2.3 (1.0)| 2.4 (1.2)|
|social_03 | 1.9 (1.6)| 4.0 (NA)| 1.6 (2.0)| 2.0 (1.2)|
|social_04 | 2.3 (1.2)| 3.0 (NA)| 2.4 (1.2)| 2.3 (1.3)|
|n | 101| 1| 40| 60|
3 missing case(s) omitted.
Item order is kept
Code
tab_counts_items(tibble::tribble(~f1, ~f2, ~f10, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2), c(
f1:f10))
Output
|f | 1| 2| total|
|:--|-------:|-------:|--------:|
|1 | 67% (2)| 33% (1)| 100% (3)|
|2 | 33% (1)| 67% (2)| 100% (3)|
|10 | 67% (2)| 33% (1)| 100% (3)|
Values are relabeled
Code
data %>% dplyr::filter(sd_gender != "diverse") %>% volker::labs_apply(cols = sd_gender,
values = list(female = "Weiblich", male = "Maennlich")) %>% volker::tab_metrics(
sd_age, sd_gender)
Output
|Gender | min| q1| median| q3| max| mean| sd| n|
|:---------|---:|----:|------:|----:|---:|----:|----:|---:|
|Weiblich | 18| 25.8| 38.0| 44.2| 63| 37.5| 13.4| 40|
|Maennlich | 19| 32.5| 38.5| 52.0| 68| 41.2| 14.0| 60|
|total | 18| 27.0| 38.0| 52.0| 68| 39.7| 13.8| 100|
Try the volker package in your browser
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
R Package Documentation
Browse R Packages
We want your feedback!
Note that we can't provide technical support on individual packages. You should contact the package authors for that.
Embedding an R snippet on your website
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.