Description Usage Arguments Details Value Note
In Mid February 2020, China changed their case definition, from RT-PCR-swab-positive to test-positive or clinical signs of viral pneumonia. This led to a large spike not representative of cases. some further thoughts: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/how-to-interpret-feb-12-case-surge/ This changes the cases on the dates shown below to the verified lab-confirmed only counts available at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:2019–20_coronavirus_pandemic_data/China_medical_cases_by_province&oldid=946973173 Note that the EuroCDC data has dates a day later than the wikipedia data for China due to time zone differences. This adjustment is only valid for EuroCDC data, for the JHU data the dates for the adjustments need to be shifted back on day. - 13/2/2020 to 1820 cases (from 15141), - 14/2/2020 to 1995 cases (from 3237), - 15/2/2020 to 1503 cases (from 2538), - 16/2/2020 to 1121 cases (from 2007),
1 |
data |
data pulled by |
In addition, there are some anomalies with Italy, resulting in these changes
1 2 3 |
These changes for Italy came from the WHO situation reports: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports.
data.frame with adjusted cases
internal
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.