knitr::opts_chunk$set(collapse = TRUE, comment = "#>") library(devtools); load_all()
In this vignette, we'll demonstrate how DemoKin
can be used to compute kinship networks for an average member of a given (female) population. Let us call her Focal: an average Swedish woman who has always lived in Sweden and whose family has never left the country.
Here, we'll show how DemoKin
can be used to compute the number and age distribution of Focal's relatives under a range of assumptions, including living and deceased kin.
First, we compute kin counts in a time-invariant framework. We assume that Focal and all of her relatives experience the 2015 mortality and fertility rates throughout their entire lives [@caswell_formal_2019]. The DemoKin
package includes data from Sweden as an example: age-by-year matrices of survival probabilities (swe_px), survival ratios (swe_Sx), fertility rates (swe_asfr), and population numbers (swe_pop). You can see the data contained in DemoKin
with data(package="DemoKin")
. This data comes from the Human Mortality Database and Human Fertility Database (see ?DemoKin::get_HMDHFD
).
In order to implement the time-invariant models, the function DemoKin::kin
expects a vector of survival ratios and another vector of fertility rates. In this example, we get the data for the year 2015, and run the matrix models:
library(DemoKin) library(tidyr) library(dplyr) library(ggplot2) library(knitr) # First, get vectors for a given year swe_surv_2015 <- swe_px[,"2015"] swe_asfr_2015 <- swe_asfr[,"2015"] # Run kinship models swe_2015 <- kin(p = swe_surv_2015, f = swe_asfr_2015, time_invariant = TRUE)
DemoKin::kin()
returns a list containing two data frames: kin_full
and kin_summary
.
kin_full
contains expected kin counts by year (or cohort), age of Focal and age of kin. Note that the columns year
and cohort
are empty if the argument is time_invariant = TRUE
in kin
(as in this example).
head(swe_2015$kin_full)
kin_summary
is a ‘summary’ data frame derived from kin_full
.
head(swe_2015$kin_summary)
To produce it, we sum over all ages of kin to produce a data frame of expected kin counts by year or cohort and age of Focal (but not by age of kin). Consider this simplified example for living kin counts:
kin_summary_example <- swe_2015$kin_full %>% select(year, cohort, kin, age_focal, age_kin, living, dead) %>% group_by(year, cohort, kin, age_focal) %>% summarise(count_living = sum(living)) head(kin_summary_example)
Let us now visualize the distribution of relatives over Focal's lifecourse using the summary data.frame kin_summary
:
swe_2015[["kin_summary"]] %>% ggplot() + geom_line(aes(age_focal, count_living)) + theme_bw() + labs(y = "Expected number of living relatives") + facet_wrap(~kin)
Here, each relative type is identified by a unique code. Note that DemoKin
uses different codes than Caswell [-@caswell_formal_2019]; the equivalence between the two set of codes is given in the following table:
demokin_codes %>%
kable
We can also visualize the age distribution of relatives when Focal is 35 years old (now, with full names to identify each relative type using the function DemoKin::rename_kin()
):
swe_2015[["kin_full"]] %>% filter(age_focal == 35) %>% ggplot() + geom_line(aes(age_kin, living)) + geom_vline(xintercept = 35, color=2) + labs(y = "Expected number of living relatives") + theme_bw() + facet_wrap(~kin)
The one-sex model implemented in DemoKin
assumes that the given fertility input applies to both sexes.
Note that, if using survival rates ($S_x$) instead of probabilities ($p_x$), fertility vectors should account for female person-year exposure, using: $(\frac{f_x+f_{x+1}S_x}{2})\frac{L_0}{l_0}$ instead of only $fx$; see Preston et.al [-@preston_demography:_2001]).
The kin
function also includes a summary output with the count of living kin, mean and standard deviation of kin age, by type of kin, for each Focal's age:
swe_2015[["kin_summary"]] %>% filter(age_focal == 35) %>% select(kin, count_living, mean_age, sd_age) %>% mutate_if(is.numeric, round, 2) %>% kable()
Finally, we can visualize the estimated kin counts by type of kin using a network diagram. Following with the age 35:
swe_2015[["kin_summary"]] %>% filter(age_focal == 35) %>% select(kin, count = count_living) %>% plot_diagram(rounding = 2)
The demography of Sweden is, in reality, changing every year. This means that Focal and her relatives will have experienced changing mortality and fertility rates over time.
We account for this, by using the time-variant models introduced by Caswell and Song [-@caswell_formal_2021].
Let's take a look at the resulting kin counts for a Focal born in 1960, limiting the output to the relative types given in the argument output_kin
:
swe_time_varying <- kin( p = swe_px, f = swe_asfr, n = swe_pop, time_invariant =FALSE, output_cohort = 1960, output_kin = c("d","gd","ggd","m","gm","ggm") ) swe_time_varying$kin_summary %>% ggplot(aes(age_focal,count_living,color=factor(cohort))) + scale_y_continuous(name = "",labels = seq(0,3,.2),breaks = seq(0,3,.2))+ geom_line(color = 1)+ geom_vline(xintercept = 35, color=2)+ labs(y = "Expected number of living relatives") + facet_wrap(~kin,scales = "free")+ theme_bw()
Kin loss can have severe consequences for bereaved relatives. It can also affect the provision of care support and intergenerational transfers over the life course.
The function kin
also includes information on the number of relatives lost by Focal during her life, stored in the column count_cum_death
:
swe_time_varying$kin_summary %>% ggplot() + geom_line(aes(age_focal, count_cum_dead)) + labs(y = "Expected number of deceased relatives") + theme_bw() + facet_wrap(~kin,scales="free")
Given these population-level measures, we can compute Focal's the mean age at the time of her relative's death. For a Focal aged 50 yo:
swe_time_varying$kin_summary %>% filter(age_focal == 50) %>% select(kin,count_cum_dead,mean_age_lost) %>% mutate_if(is.numeric, round, 2) %>% kable()
Given the distribution of kin by age, we can compute the expected portion of living kin in some stage given a set of prevalences by age (e.g., a disease, employment, etc.). This is known as the Sullivan Method in the life-table literature. A matrix formulation for same results can be found in Caswell [-@caswell_formal_2019], which can also be extended to a time-variant framework.
# let´s create some prevalence by age swe_2015_prevalence <- tibble( age_kin = unique(swe_2015$kin_full$age_kin), prev = .005 * exp(.05 * age_kin) ) # join to kin count estimates and plot swe_2015$kin_full %>% left_join(swe_2015_prevalence) %>% group_by(kin, age_focal) %>% summarise( prevalent = sum(living * prev), no_prevalent = sum(living * (1-prev)) ) %>% pivot_longer(cols = prevalent:no_prevalent, names_to = "prevalence_state", values_to = "count") %>% ggplot(aes(x=age_focal, y = count)) + geom_area(aes(fill=prevalence_state)) + facet_wrap(~kin) + theme_bw()
DemoKin
allows the computation of kin structures in a multi-state framework, classifying individuals jointly by age and some other feature (e.g., stages of a disease). For this, we need mortality and fertility data for each possible stage and probabilities of changing state by age.
Let's consider the example of Slovakia given by Caswell [-@caswell_formal_2021], where stages are parity states.
DemoKin
includes the data to replicate this analysis for the year 1980:
svk_fxs
is the fertility rate by age (rows) for each parity stage (columns). The first stage represents $parity=0$; the second stage, $parity=1$; and so on, until finally the sixth stage represents $parity\geq5$.svk_Hxs
has a similar structure but with $1$'s in the ages corresponding to newborns (the first age in our example). svk_pxs
has the same structure and represents survival probabilities. svk_Uxs
has the same number of elements and ages (in this case 110, where $omega$ is 109). For each age, it contains a column-stochastic transition matrix with dimension for the state space. The entries are transition probabilities conditional on survival. Following Caswell [-@caswell_formal_2020], we can obtain the joint age-parity kin structure:
# use birth_female=1 because fertility is for female only demokin_svk1980_caswell2020 <- kin_multi_stage( U = svk_Uxs, f = svk_fxs, D = svk_pxs, H = svk_Hxs, birth_female=1, parity = TRUE)
Note that the function ask for risks already in a certain matrix format. As an example, consider the age-parity distribution of aunts, when Focal is 20 and 60 yo (this is equivalent to Figure 4 in Caswell [-@caswell_formal_2021]).
demokin_svk1980_caswell2020 %>% filter(kin %in% c("oa","ya"), age_focal %in% c(20,60)) %>% mutate(parity = as.integer(stage_kin)-1, parity = case_when(parity == 5 ~ "5+", T ~ as.character(parity)) ) %>% group_by(age_focal, age_kin, parity) %>% summarise(count= sum(living)) %>% ggplot() + geom_bar(aes(x=age_kin, y = count, fill=parity), stat = "identity") + geom_vline(aes(xintercept = age_focal), col=2) + labs(y = "Number of aunts") + theme_bw() + facet_wrap(~age_focal, nrow = 2)
We can also see the portion of living daughters and mothers at different parity stages over Focal's life-course (this is equivalent to Figure 9 and 10 in Caswell [-@caswell_formal_2021]).
demokin_svk1980_caswell2020 %>% filter(kin %in% c("d","m")) %>% mutate(parity = as.integer(stage_kin)-1, parity = case_when(parity == 5 ~ "5+", T ~ as.character(parity))) %>% group_by(age_focal, kin, parity) %>% summarise(count= sum(living)) %>% DemoKin::rename_kin() %>% ggplot() + geom_bar(aes(x=age_focal, y = count, fill=parity), stat = "identity") + labs(y = "Kin count") + theme_bw() + facet_wrap(~kin, nrow = 2)
This function kin_multi_stage
can be generalized to any kind of state (be sure to set parameter parity = FALSE
, de default).
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.