#' Dyadic sequences of 64 heterosexual couples
#'
#' Will be used to exemplify a typical data structure
#' and to illustrate the several function of this package.
#'
#' In the original sample study, which was promoted as a study on close relationship and stress,
#' 198 heterosexual couples living in Switzerland participated.
#'
#' The couples had to have been in the current romantic relationship for at least a year
#' and to use German language as their main communication language. During the study, either
#' the woman, the man, or both partners were stressed using the Trier Social Stress
#' Test (TSST; Kirschbaum, Pirke, Hellhammer, 1993). For exemplification purposes, only those
#' 64 couples are included where only the female partner was stressed. Directly after the stress
#' induction, both partners joint again and the couple was left alone for eight minutes. During
#' this period (a 'fake' waiting condition) the two partners were filmed for 8 minutes divided
#' into 48 intervals of ten seconds length. It was coded if the female partners showed stress
#' communication (SC) within an interval (sequence 1; Colums 50:97) and if the male partner showd
#' dyadic coping reactions (DC; sequence 2; columns 2:49). For rurther insides about dyadic coping
#' and/or stress communication, see Bodenmann (2015).
#'
#'
#'
#' Coding:
#' \itemize{
#' \item code: ID variable
#' \item IKCB01-IKCB48: Was stress communication (SC) shown in the time intervalls 1-48?
#' \item DCCB01-DCCB48: Was dyadic coping (DC) shown in the time intervalls 1-48?
#' \item EDCm: Men's self-assessed dyadic coping ability\cr
#' }
#' @format A data frame with 64 rows and 98 variables:
#'
#' @source data: research grants 100013-115948/1 and 100014-115948 from the Swiss National Science Foundation.
#'
#' @references
#' \itemize{
#' \item Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993) <DOI: 10.1159/000119004>
#' \item Bodenmann, G. (2015) <DOI: 10.1037/11031-002>
#' }
'CouplesCope'
#' Dyadic sequences of 45 subjects engaging a social dilemma
#'
#' The data set stems from the bachelor thesis of Halstenberg (2016) and
#' contains sequences of 45 subjects that engaged in a 32-rounds-long
#' four-coin dilemma. That is, each player starts with four coins that
#' are worth one point for oneself and two points for the opponent. Both
#' players have to submit zero to four of them to the other player. The
#' decision is made secretly and simultaneously.
#'
#' The computer was set to ignore the humans behavior at all. Instead the
#' 32 rounds were divided into eight blocks. Within each block, the computer
#' gave one-times one, two-times two, and one-times three coins in randomized
#' order. The only exception was the very first turn, in which the algorithm
#' always gave two coins followed by one, two and three coins in randomized
#' order.Thus, on average, the algorithm gave two coins. Hence, it was
#' always possible for the human player to give more or fewer coins than the
#' algorithm did before.
#'
#' For the humnan, it was coded whether the human player gave more (1) coins
#' in his turn than the algorithm did in the last turn or not (0). The same
#' was coded for the computer. Thus, coding started in the second turn
#' resulting in 31 entries for each of both.
#'
#' The data frame contains 45 rows (subjects) and 62 columns. Columns 1 to
#' 31 correspond to the human behavior, columns 32:61 to the algorithm.
#'
#' @source Halstenberg, E. (2016). The effect of social value orientation on cooperation in a four-coin dilemma: a quasi-replication study using the svo slider measure. (Unpublished bachelor thesis). University Bielefeld, Germany.
#'
'GiveSome'
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.