inst/resources/analysis/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/reproducibility.md

In aclu-national/LibLabReviews: Encourage Effective Peer Review Practices with Useful Tooling

name: Reproducibility about: The reviewer is struggling to reproduce core parts of the analysis title: '[Reproducibility] [ISSUE TITLE]' labels: 'Reproducibility :ledger:'

Reproduction Problem

Reproducibility Checklist

- [ ] Unable to "source" (eg can't knit a markdown without errors) - [ ] "data" dependency missing (eg analysis sources a local dataset the reviewer doesnt have) - [ ] code dependency missing (eg analysis uses a function that is not part of the library and not in a clearly defined library) - [ ] Order of operations is unclear (eg don't know which files to source in which order) - [ ] Environment problems (eg version of R or a package a person is using could be causing issues) - [ ] Outputs not in line with descriptions (eg person comments out a number of rows and it differs from what you see when running the equivalent code)

Needed Changes or Information to Fix

Regression Fixes

Context (Environment)

Reprodicibility Recceipt

# Datetime
Sys.time()

# Repo
git2r::repository()

# Session Info
sessioninfo::session_info()

aclu-national/LibLabReviews documentation built on Aug. 20, 2020, 7:23 a.m.