agree_test | R Documentation |
Development on agree_test()
is complete, and for new code we recommend
switching to agreement_limit()
, which is easier to use, has more features,
and still under active development.
The agree_test function calculates a variety of agreement statistics. The hypothesis test of agreement is calculated by the method described by Shieh (2019). Bland-Altman limits of agreement, and confidence intervals, are also provided (Bland & Altman 1999; Bland & Altman 1986). In addition, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC; Lin 1989) is additional part of the output.
agree_test(
x,
y,
delta,
conf.level = 0.95,
agree.level = 0.95,
TOST = TRUE,
prop_bias = FALSE
)
x |
Vector with first measurement |
y |
Vector with second measurement |
delta |
The threshold below which methods agree/can be considered equivalent, can be in any units. Often referred to as the "Equivalence Bound for Agreement" or "Maximal Allowable Difference". |
conf.level |
the confidence level required. Default is 95%. |
agree.level |
the agreement level required. Default is 95%. The proportion of data that should lie between the thresholds, for 95% limits of agreement this should be 0.95. |
TOST |
Logical indicator (TRUE/FALSE) of whether to use two one-tailed tests for the limits of agreement. Default is TRUE. |
prop_bias |
Logical indicator (TRUE/FALSE) of whether proportional bias should be considered for the limits of agreement calculations. |
Returns single list with the results of the agreement analysis.
shieh_test
: The TOST hypothesis test as described by Shieh.
ccc.xy
: Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and confidence intervals.
s.shift
: Scale shift from x to y.
l.shift
: Location shift from x to y.
bias
: a bias correction factor that measures how far the best-fit line deviates from a line at 45 degrees. No deviation from the 45 degree line occurs when bias = 1. See Lin 1989, page 258.
loa
: Data frame containing the limits of agreement calculations
h0_test
: Decision from hypothesis test.
call
: the matched call
Shieh (2019). Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Quantitative Measurements: Exact Test Procedure and Sample Size Calculation, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1080/19466315.2019.1677495")}
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical methods in medical research, 8(2), 135-160.
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The lancet, 327(8476), 307-310.
Lawrence, I., & Lin, K. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 255-268.
data('reps')
agree_test(x=reps$x, y=reps$y, delta = 2)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.