cran-comments.md

pvLRT v0.5.1

Resubmission

This is a re-submission of the package pvLRT. In this version we have made the following changes:

Test environments

R CMD Check Results

Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION: Pharmacovigilance (2:50) pharmacovigilance (21:71)

Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs: URL: https://fis.fda.gov/extensions/FPD-QDE-FAERS/FPD-QDE-FAERS.html From: man/faers22q3raw.Rd man/gbca.Rd man/lovastatin.Rd man/statin.Rd man/statin1491.Rd man/statin46.Rd Status: Error Message: SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate in certificate chain

pvLRT v0.5

Resubmission

This is a re-submission of the package pvLRT. In this version we have made the following changes:

Test environments

R CMD Check Results

which we believe is a false alarm.

pvLRT v0.4

Resubmission

This is a re-submission of the package pvLRT. In this version we have made the following changes:

Test environments

R CMD Check Results

pvLRT v0.3

This is a CRAN submission for the (new) R package pvLRT v0.3, which provides a suite of functions implementing likelihood ratio test-based approaches to pharmacovigilance. We have ensured that all examples take \< 10s time to pass the CRAN check in this version. (One example failed this test during the initial CRAN submission of v0.2.)

In addition, we have taken into account all the helpful comments and suggestions provided by Gregor Seyer on behalf of CRAN during the submission of pvLRT v0.2.1. We greatly appreciate the comments; we have made all the necessary changes in v0.3, and our point-by-point responses are provided below.

Point-by-point responses addressing Greg Seyer's comments on pvLRT v0.2.1

--> Response: Thanks for the suggestion. In v0.3, we have updated the DESCRIPTION with an appropriately populated Authors\@R{.email} filed.

--> Response: We have updated the title to: "Likelihood Ratio Test-Based Approaches to Pharmacovigilance" (59 characters)

*Please omit the redundant "An R package" from your description.

--> Response: We have made this change.

--> Response: Thanks, we don't yet have references describing the methods in our package, so we have not made any change on this point.

--> Response: Thank you for the suggestion. In pvLRT v0.3, we have added a \value tag to each exported method, which describes the output structure and what the output means.

\dontrun{} should only be used if the example really cannot be executed (e.g. because of missing additional software, missing API keys, ...) by the user. That's why wrapping examples in \dontrun{} adds the comment ("# Not run:") as a warning for the user. Does not seem necessary.

Please unwrap the examples if they are executable in \< 5 sec, or replace \dontrun{} with \donttest{}.

--> Response: Thank you for pointing this out. We have removed the \dontrun{} wrappers throughout. We have used fewer iterations in the examples wherever appropriate (with added comments) to ensure that all but one example take \<5 secs to run. One example under the function pvlrt still takes >5 secs; we have wrapped it under \donttest{}.

Test environments

R CMD Check Results

New submission

Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: Pharmacovigilance (2:50) pharmacovigilance (11:71)

We believe this NOTE is a false alarm.

pvLRT v0.2.1

This is a new CRAN submission for R package pvLRT, which provides a suite of functions implementing likelihood ratio test-based approaches to pharmacovigilance. In this version we have made sure that:

Test environments

R CMD Check Results

New submission

Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION: Pharmacovigilance (3:23) pharmacovigilance (8:97)

We believe this NOTE is a false alarm, as 'pharmacovigilance' refers to the field relating to the collection, detection, assessment, monitoring, and prevention of adverse events with pharmaceutical products (Wikipedia; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmacovigilance).



c7rishi/pvLRT documentation built on March 11, 2023, 12:50 a.m.