analysis/reports/ts_report.md

In diazrenata/cats: CATS

SV report

Nsamples

The maximum number of samples is 2500.

The minimum number of samples is 2500.

Percentile values by site

These are histograms of the skewness/simpson's percentile values of all years for each site. The purple dots are the x-value (percentile value) for 2009.

Questions here are:

1. How pointy/broad are these histograms? (More rigorous metrics later, this is just a gestalt)
2. Is 2009 generally an outlier, or not?

## Warning: Duplicated aesthetics after name standardisation: pad

## Warning: Duplicated aesthetics after name standardisation: pad

My gleanings from these:

1. 2009 is not particularly weird, but there is a lot of variation that you simply won't capture by pulling out one year.
2. Simpson's is consistently more extreme than skewness; this is consistent with scadsplants, scadsanalysis.
3. This needs to be addressed more rigorously, but it looks like sites with more extreme centers-of-mass have less general variation than sites that do not? This is probably constrained because the percentile scale has hard ends at 0 and 100.

diazrenata/cats documentation built on Nov. 22, 2019, 7:45 p.m.