knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE)
You are given a conceptual diagram for the carbon flow describing decay of particulate organic matter in marine sediments.
{width=10cm}
Create the mass balance equations based on this diagram.
Methane ($CH_4$) is an important greenhouse gas, contributing more than 20% to global warming. Methane emissions from wetlands are key to the global methane dynamics.
You will devise a simple model of methane dynamics in these wetland systems that can be used to assess the future role of methane in global warming.
The model represents the upper part of the wetland soil that is in contact with the atmosphere. The model should include methane production and oxidation (biogeochemical processes), the storage (burial) of methane in wetland soils, and methane emissions to the atmosphere (the latter two as transport processes).
In the soil, methane is produced (from acetic acid, $CH_3COOH$) under anaerobic conditions, which proceeds in two subsequent reactions:
$$Reaction~1:\qquad CH_3COOH \rightarrow CH_4 + CO_2$$ $$Reaction~2:\qquad CO_2 + 4H_2 \rightarrow CH_4 + 2H_2O$$
Methane oxidation occurs under aerobic conditions via the following reaction:
$$Reaction~3:\qquad CH_4 + 2O_2 \rightarrow CO_2 + 2H_2O$$
Hints: You can use these data to estimate the rates of processes described by reactions 1, 2 and 3 (denoted as $R_1$, $R_2$ and $R_3$). To do this, you may assume that the changes in concentrations (the time derivative on the left-hand side of your mass balance equations) are so much smaller than the individual fluxes (the terms on the right-hand side of the mass balance equations) that they can be ignored. Thus, you may set, in your mass balance equations, $dCH_4/dt = 0$, $dCO_2/dt =0$ and $dO_2/dt = 0$, and fill in the measured data. Then you use simple algebraic techniques to solve the linear equations to derive the rates $R_1$, $R_2$ and $R_3$.
Methane ($CH_4$) within marine sediments is distributed in three pools: the hydrate pool (solid), the dissolved pool and the gas phase.
Dissolved methane is produced from organic matter in the anaerobic part of the sediment (by a process called methanogenesis). Methane is exchanged among these three pools, but it can also leave the sediment via ebullition (formation of gas bubbles and their escape due to buoyancy), or via diffusive transport of dissolved $CH_4$ to the overlying ocean water. (Note: we will ignore methane burial into deeper sediment layers in this exercise.) Especially the gas phase is important for the Earth's warming, as this readily adds to methane in the atmosphere.
Fortunately, there is an important sink of methane in the marine sediments: microbial anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), which is the reaction of dissolved methane with sulphate according to the reaction:
$$CH_4 + SO_4^{2-} \rightarrow HCO_3^- + HS^- + H_2O$$
There is some doubt in the extent that the AOM can function as a methane "filter" to prevent the escape of methane to the atmosphere.
Make a model of the production of methane, the transformation of methane between the three phases (gas, dissolved, solid), and its removal via transport processes and the main chemical reaction.
In the natural environment, the cycles of many constituents are linked via chemical reactions that produce and consume them. We take the biogeochemical cycling of carbon ($C$), nitrogen ($N$) and oxygen ($O$) in a marine sediment as an example.
In aquatic sediments, organic matter (OM) is the driver of a whole set of biogeochemical reactions. Here we simplify the sequence of reactions a bit, in the sense that we ignore the iron, manganese, and sulfur cycle. Additionally, we do not explicitly take into account the methane production. Rather, their impact is lumped so that their effect on oxygen and nitrogen cycle is represented.
The organic matter is assumed to have Redfield stoichiometry, so the C:N:P (molar!) ratio is 106:16:1. We represent OM as $$(CH_2O)1(NH_3){NC}(H_3PO_4)_{PC},$$ where $NC$ = 16/106 and $PC$ = 1/106.
OM is mineralized (oxidized) using a series of oxidants: oxygen ($O_2$), nitrate ($HNO_3$) and some other, unidentified oxidant ($XO_2$), which represents the lumpsum of manganese, iron oxides and sulphate.
The reduced byproducts of this mineralization process, ammonia ($NH_3$), and an unidentified reduced substance ($X$), which is the lump-sum of reduced manganese and iron ions and sulphide ($X = [2Mn^{2+} + 4 Fe^{2+} + 0.5 H_2S]$), can be re-oxidized by a reaction with oxygen.
All dissolved substances are exchanged with the water column. OM is added to the sediment by deposition from the water column. $N_2$, produced by the reaction of organic matter with nitrate, does not react in the sediment and does not need to be considered in the model. Also, the possibility that the unidentified reduced substance $X$ can additionally be re-oxidized by nitrate can be ignored.
The mineralization reactions can be written as (note that you need to know a little about balancing redox reactions in order to understand why the reactions, and specifically their stoichiometry, have the form as written here):
The secondary reactions to be considered are:
Based on the above reactions and the exchanges with the water-column, create mass balance equations for the following sediment state variables:
Organic matter, $Corg$
the oxidized substance, $XO_2$
What are suitable units for the state variables?
Now assume that we incubate a natural sediment in a small Perspex container (inner diameter $30~cm$), with $15~cm$ of water overlying the sediment. The water is stirred so that, at all times, the overlying water is completely mixed. Also, there is no activity in the water column itself, so that all changes in the overlying water are due to the exchange with the sediment.
We are interested in the dynamics of oxygen, nitrate, and ammonium in the overlying water. The concentration of the other reduced substances in the sediment are assumed to be 0 (and so the flux from the sediment is also assumed to be 0).
Unidentified reduced substances in the overlying water, $X_{wat}$
What are suitable units for these water-column state variables? What are the units of their time-derivatives?
In the ocean, most of the primary production (the creation of biomass from inorganic components) is done by microscopic organisms, called algae, that use light as a source of energy. These algae either live in the water column (pelagic algae, also called phytoplankton), or on top of the sediment (benthic algae, also called phytobenthos).
The living conditions of these two types of algae are fundamentally different. In well mixed waters, the free-floating algae, when close to the water surface, have ample light, but their growth may be limited by the availability of inorganic nutrients such as nitrate and ammonium. In contrast, benthic algae experience much less light as they live at the bottom of the water column (the light intensity decreases significantly as it propagates through the water column; so-called light extinction). However, the benthic algae have ample supply of nutrients that are regenerated from the bottom detritus derived from pelagic algae and pelagic detritus that settle on the sediment.
In the environments where benthic algae can grow, they can take up significant amounts of nutrients that might otherwise benefit the pelagic algae. On the other hand, when the pelagic algae are able to grow vigorously in the waters, their large biomass may significantly reduce the light penetration in the water, thus hampering the production of benthic algae. Thus, there is a trade-off as to which of these algae will dominate in a system.
You are now challenged to make a simple model that is able to investigate these dynamics. Choose the relevant state variables in the water column and in the sediment. You do not need to distinguish between ammonium or nitrate, but rather lump these two in a pool of "Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen" (DIN). This DIN is the only nutrient that might limit algal growth (i.e., you can ignore phosphorus dynamics in your model).
There is no need to make a mass balance equation for light, but you should consider the Lambert-Beer law, which says that the light intensity in the water-column decreases exponentially with water depth.
How will water depth influence the relative proportion of pelagic and benthic production?
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.