imsM: Ratings on the full Investment Model Scale (IMS) from 282...
In jsakaluk/dySEM: Dyadic Structural Equation Modeling

imsM	R Documentation

Ratings on the full Investment Model Scale (IMS) from 282 (M)ixed-sex couples

Description

A data set containing 5 ratings for each of (1) satisfaction, (2) quality of alternatives, (3) investment, and 4 (commitment) for each member of a mixed-sex romantic dyad. Measured using the Investment Model Scale subscales (Rusbult, Martz, & Agnew, 1998). Data are from Sakaluk, Fisher, and Kilshaw's (2021) study of dyadic invariance. Variable names have been re-coded to follow a stem-item-partner ("sip") order, with a delimiter ("_") between the item number and partner distinguishing character.

Usage

data(imsM)

Format

A data frame with 282 rows and 40 variables:

sat.g1_f: Satisfaction item 1 for female partner
sat.g2_f: Satisfaction item 2 for female partner
sat.g3_f: Satisfaction item 3 for female partner
sat.g4_f: Satisfaction item 4 for female partner
sat.g5_f: Satisfaction item 5 for female partner
qalt.g1_f: Quality of alternatives item 1 for female partner
qalt.g2_f: Quality of alternatives item 2 for female partner
qalt.g3_f: Quality of alternatives item 3 for female partner
qalt.g4_f: Quality of alternatives item 4 for female partner
qalt.g5_f: Quality of alternatives item 5 for female partner
invest.g1_f: Investment item 1 for female partner
invest.g2_f: Investment item 2 for female partner
invest.g3_f: Investment item 3 for female partner
invest.g4_f: Investment item 4 for female partner
invest.g5_f: Investment item 5 for female partner
com1_f: Commitment items item 1 for female partner
com2_f: Commitment items item 2 for female partner
com3_f: Commitment items item 3 for female partner
com4_f: Commitment items item 4 for female partner
com5_f: Commitment items item 5 for female partner
sat.g1_m: Satisfaction item 1 for male partner
sat.g2_m: Satisfaction item 2 for male partner
sat.g3_m: Satisfaction item 3 for male partner
sat.g4_m: Satisfaction item 4 for male partner
sat.g5_m: Satisfaction item 5 for male partner
qalt.g1_m: Quality of alternatives item 1 for male partner
qalt.g2_m: Quality of alternatives item 2 for male partner
qalt.g3_m: Quality of alternatives item 3 for male partner
qalt.g4_m: Quality of alternatives item 4 for male partner
qalt.g5_m: Quality of alternatives item 5 for male partner
invest.g1_m: Investment item 1 for male partner
invest.g2_m: Investment item 2 for male partner
invest.g3_m: Investment item 3 for male partner
invest.g4_m: Investment item 4 for male partner
invest.g5_m: Investment item 5 for male partner
com1_m: Commitment items item 1 for male partner
com2_m: Commitment items item 2 for male partner
com3_m: Commitment items item 3 for male partner
com4_m: Commitment items item 4 for male partner
com5_m: Commitment items item 5 for male partner

References

Sakaluk, J. K., Fisher, A. N., & Kilshaw, R. E.(2021). Dyadic measurement invariance and its importance for replicability in romantic relationship research. Personal Relationships, 28(1), 190-226. .

jsakaluk/dySEM documentation built on Feb. 24, 2025, 5:05 p.m.