This document presents possible options of how the final model can be described through plots and graphics
As you actually saw in the previous sections, the model transformation can be presented on simple graphics. In continuous predictor case, the transformation is plotted as estimated spline - in case of discrete predictor, factorMerger plot is used.
For quantitative predictors some additional options are offered. Let's check them on the below examples.
Let's use already known Boston Housing Data, and a random forest model.
library(pdp) data(boston) str(boston) data(boston) set.seed(123) library(randomForest) boston.rf <- randomForest(cmedv ~ lstat + ptratio + age, data = boston)
Also let's build xspliner model with lstat and ptratio transformation.
library(xspliner) model_xs <- xspline(cmedv ~ xs(lstat) + xs(ptratio) + age, model = boston.rf)
In order to plot specified predictor transformation you can use general plot method:
plot(model_xs, "lstat")
or use explicit function
plot_variable_transition(model_xs, "lstat")
In general plot method provides all functionality that xspliner provides for graphics. For transition plotting you may use explicit plot_variable_transition
or general plot
with providing corresponding parameters.
You can also add some additional information for the plot.
Plotting training data
Just add two parameters: data = <training data>
and flag plot_data = TRUE
.
plot_variable_transition(model_xs, "lstat", data = boston, plot_data = TRUE)
Plotting approximation derivative
The derivative is plotted on scale of the second axis. To display it just add: plot_deriv = TRUE
.
plot_variable_transition(model_xs, "lstat", plot_deriv = TRUE)
You can also specify if the model effect or transition should be displayed. Parameters responsible for that are plot_response
and plot_approx
respectively.
For example below we display just the approximation and derivative for ptratio variable:
plot_variable_transition(model_xs, "ptratio", plot_response = FALSE, plot_deriv = TRUE)
As we may want to compare the final GLM model with its parent black box, xspliner provides one simple tool.
For comparison just add use plot_model_comparison
or use general plot
method with corresponding parameters:
plot_model_comparison(model_xs, model = boston.rf, data = boston)
or
plot(model_xs, model = boston.rf, data = boston)
The resulting graphics compares predicted values for both GLM and black box model.
For predicting values standard predict method is used: function(object, newdata) predict(object, newdata)
.
So for regression models the results are on the same scale.
The notable difference occurs in the classification models. GLM models by default return "link" function values, so for classification it can be any real number. Contrary to that, randomForest function returns predicted levels.
To avoid the problem, predictor_funs
parameter was added. This is the list of prediction functions for each model (in order: black box, xspliner). Let's see it on SVM example:
iris_data <- droplevels(iris[iris$Species != "setosa", ]) library(e1071) library(xspliner) model_svm <- svm(Species ~ Sepal.Length + Sepal.Width + Petal.Length + Petal.Width, data = iris_data, probability = TRUE) model_xs <- xspline(Species ~ xs(Sepal.Length) + xs(Sepal.Width) + xs(Petal.Length) + xs(Petal.Width), model = model_svm)
Now we specify predict functions to return probability of virginica response.
prob_svm <- function(object, newdata) attr(predict(object, newdata = newdata, probability = TRUE), "probabilities")[, 2] prob_xs <- function(object, newdata) predict(object, newdata = newdata, type = "response")
And plot the result
plot_model_comparison(model_xs, model = model_svm, data = iris_data, prediction_funs = list(prob_xs, prob_svm) )
It is also possible to sort the values of heatmap according to chosen model:
plot_model_comparison(model_xs, model = model_svm, data = iris_data, prediction_funs = list(prob_xs, prob_svm), sort_by = "svm" )
In case of class predictions, let's create class prediction function first:
class_svm <- function(object, newdata) predict(object, newdata = newdata) response_levels <- levels(iris_data$Species) class_xs <- function(object, newdata) { probs <- predict(object, newdata = newdata, type = "response") factor(ifelse(probs > 0.5, response_levels[2], response_levels[1]), levels = response_levels) }
And plot the result:
plot_model_comparison(model_xs, model = model_svm, data = iris_data, prediction_funs = list(class_xs, class_svm) )
Sorting values according to specified model is also possible:
plot_model_comparison(model_xs, model = model_svm, data = iris_data, prediction_funs = list(class_xs, class_svm), sort_by = "svm" )
Following above approach it's easy to generate similar graphics for higher amount of models.
Just include additional models inside compare_with
parameter (named list), and add corresponding predict functions to them to predictor_funs
parameter (if omitted, the default one is used).
See below example on airquality data
library(mgcv) data(airquality) ozone <- subset(na.omit(airquality), select = c("Ozone", "Solar.R", "Wind", "Temp")) set.seed(123) model_rf <- randomForest(Ozone ~ ., data = ozone) model_xs <- xspline(Ozone ~ xs(Solar.R) + xs(Wind) + xs(Temp), model_rf, data = ozone) model_glm <- glm(Ozone ~ ., data = ozone) model_gam <- mgcv::gam(Ozone ~ s(Solar.R) + s(Wind) + s(Temp), data = ozone) plot_model_comparison(model_xs, model = model_rf, data = ozone, compare_with = list(glm = model_glm, gam = model_gam), sort_by = "xspliner")
If you want to display many transitions on one plot just pass xspliner model to plot:
plot_variable_transition(model_xs)
For models trained on top of many predictors, there will be displayed plots for 6 first transformed variables.
To change that value just set n_plots
variable:
plot_variable_transition(model_xs, n_plots = 2)
You can select interesting variables to plot just passing predictor names in vector:
plot_variable_transition(model_xs, c("Wind", "Temp"))
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.