stoch_pred: A stochastic prediction results

Description Usage Arguments Value Author(s) References

View source: R/Maxcombo_size.R

Description

A stochastic-process way of prediction of the expected event ratio (D), mean difference (μ), and the information(variance) using stoch_pred or the covariance using stoch_pred.cov.

Usage

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
stoch_pred(eps, p, b, tau, omega, lambda, theta, rho, gamma, R)

stoch_pred.cov(
  eps,
  p,
  b,
  tau,
  omega,
  lambda,
  theta,
  rho1,
  gamma1,
  rho2,
  gamma2,
  R
)

Arguments

eps

delayed treatment effect time.

p

probability of treatment assignment.

b

the number of sub-intervals at each time point, the larger the finer splitting for more accurate computation. Usually b = 30 is sufficient.

omega

the minimum follow-up time for all the patients. Note that Hasegawa(2014) assumes that the accrual is uniform between time 0 and R, and there does not exist any censoring except for the administrative censoring at the ending time τ. Thus this value omega is equivalent to tau-R.

lambda

the hazard for the control group.

theta

the hazard ratio after the delayed time eps for the treatment arm.

rho, rho1, rho2

the first parameter for Fleming Harrington weighted log-rank test:W(t)=S^ρ(t^-)(1-S(t^-))^γ.

gamma, gamma1, gamma2

the second parameter for Fleming Harrington weighted log-rank test:W(t)=S^ρ(t^-)(1-S(t^-))^γ.

R

the accrual period.

Value

sum_D

the mean expected event ratio. Once being multiplied by n, it will become the stochastically predicted event size.

inf or covariance

the information/variance or covariance (averaged for each subject), should be multiplied by n, which gives the stochastically predicted information.

E.star

the unit mean, corresponding to E^* in Hasegawa(2014), or the \tilde{μ} of formula (8) in Wang et al(2021).

trt_vs_ctrl_N

the ratio of the samples sizes between the two arms, treatment vs control, corresponding to the time vector t_vec.

t_vec

the time sequence corresponding to trt_vs_ctrl_N.

Author(s)

Lili Wang

References

Hasegawa, T. (2014). Sample size determination for the weighted log‐rank test with the Fleming–Harrington class of weights in cancer vaccine studies. Pharmaceutical statistics, 13(2), 128-135. Wang, L., Luo, X., & Zheng, C. (2021). A Simulation-free Group Sequential Design with Max-combo Tests in the Presence of Non-proportional Hazards. Journal of Pharmaceutical Statistics.


lilywang1988/GSMC documentation built on March 9, 2021, 5:25 p.m.