FIXME:
Thanks. I actually don't think that was the problem, so I feel a little bit better about myself (I tried lots of things and may have pushed at a random time). In any case, thanks for solving.
Take a look at the anchorplot again when you can.
We should definitely avoid saying things like:
, values=c("pred"="red", "eff"="blue", "zero"="black")
since it's not DRY. I don't think it should ever be necessary.
I think it would be better if the default linetypes were based on estimate vs. confidence limit, rather than on which model we're using. That does mean we're more reliant on color, though... I still think it's better for now. Maybe make a type column which is either "est" or "bound" and use lty 1 and 3 respectively. Am I making sense?
Also, is there a way to add the anchor point to the grid, so that the CI lines always meet at the anchor (when the anchor is achieved)? If you look at the current anchorplot, you will see that the "zero" bounds look a little weird at the intersection; this could be solved by making sure the anchor is on the grid, I think.
You will need to install https://github.com/JLSteenwyk/ggpubfigs to use the current anchorplot.
When do we expect joint model work well
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.