knitr::opts_chunk$set( collapse = TRUE, comment = "#>" ) options(knitr.table.format = "html") htmltools::img(src = knitr::image_uri("logo.png"), alt = 'RxODE', style = 'position:absolute; top:0; right:0; padding:10px; border: 0;')
In pharmacometrics the nonlinear-mixed effect modeling software (like nlmixr) characterizes the between-subject variability. With this between subject variability you can simulate new subjects.
Assuming that you have a 2-compartment, indirect response model, you can set create an RxODE model describing this system below:
library(RxODE) mod <- RxODE({ eff(0) = 1 C2 = centr/V2*(1+prop.err); C3 = peri/V3; CL = TCl*exp(eta.Cl) ## This is coded as a variable in the model d/dt(depot) =-KA*depot; d/dt(centr) = KA*depot - CL*C2 - Q*C2 + Q*C3; d/dt(peri) = Q*C2 - Q*C3; d/dt(eff) = Kin - Kout*(1-C2/(EC50+C2))*eff; })
The next step is to get the parameters into R so that you can start the simulation:
theta <- c(KA=2.94E-01, TCl=1.86E+01, V2=4.02E+01, # central Q=1.05E+01, V3=2.97E+02, # peripheral Kin=1, Kout=1, EC50=200, prop.err=0) # effects
In this case, I use lotri to specify the omega since it uses similar
lower-triangular matrix specification as nlmixr (also similar to
NONMEM):
## the column names of the omega matrix need to match the parameters specified by RxODE omega <- lotri(eta.Cl ~ 0.4^2) omega
The next step to simulate is to create the dosing regimen for overall simulation:
ev <- et(amount.units="mg", time.units="hours") %>% et(amt=10000, cmt="centr")
If you wish, you can also add sampling times (though now RxODE can fill these in for you):
ev <- ev %>% et(0,48, length.out=100);
Note the et takes similar arguments as seq when adding sampling
times. There are more methods to adding sampling times and events to
make complex dosing regimens (See the event
vignette). This includes ways to add variability
to the both the sampling and dosing
times).
Once this is complete you can simulate using the rxSolve routine:
sim <- rxSolve(mod,theta,ev,omega=omega,nSub=100)
To quickly look and customize your simulation you use the default
plot routine. Since this is an RxODE object, it will create a
ggplot2 object that you can modify as you wish. The extra parameter
to the plot tells RxODE/R what piece of information you are
interested in plotting. In this case, we are interested in looking at
the derived parameter C2:
library(ggplot2) plot(sim, C2) + coord_trans(y = "log10") + ylab("Central Compartment") + xlab("Time") + guides(color=FALSE)
Of course this additional parameter could also be a state value, like eff:
plot(sim, "eff") + coord_trans(y = "log10") + ylab("Effect") + xlab("Time") + guides(color=FALSE)
Or you could even look at the two side-by-side:
plot(sim, C2, eff) + coord_trans(y = "log10") + ylab("Effect") + xlab("Time") + guides(color=FALSE)
Usually in pharmacometric simulations it is not enough to simply simulate the system. We have to do something easier to digest, like look at the central and extreme tendencies of the simulation.
Since the RxODE solve object is a type of data
frame
It is now straightforward to perform calculations and generate plots with the simulated data. Below, the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles of the simulated data are plotted.
library(dplyr) library(ggplot2) p <- c(0.05, 0.5, 0.95); s <-sim %>% group_by(time) %>% do(data.frame(p=p, eff=quantile(.$eff, probs=p), eff.n = length(.$eff), eff.avg = mean(.$eff), centr=quantile(.$centr, probs=p), centr.n=length(.$centr),centr.avg = mean(.$centr))) %>% mutate(Percentile=factor(sprintf("%d%%",p*100),levels=c("5%","50%","95%"))) ggplot(s,aes(time,centr,color=Percentile)) + geom_line(size=1) + coord_trans(y = "log10") + ylab("Central Concentration") + xlab("Time")
ggplot(s,aes(time,eff,color=Percentile)) + geom_line(size=1) + ylab("Effect") + xlab("Time") + guides(color=FALSE)
Note that you can see the parameters that were simulated for the example
head(sim$param)
In addition to conveniently simulating between subject variability, you can also easily simulate unexplained variability.
mod <- RxODE({ eff(0) = 1 C2 = centr/V2; C3 = peri/V3; CL = TCl*exp(eta.Cl) ## This is coded as a variable in the model d/dt(depot) =-KA*depot; d/dt(centr) = KA*depot - CL*C2 - Q*C2 + Q*C3; d/dt(peri) = Q*C2 - Q*C3; d/dt(eff) = Kin - Kout*(1-C2/(EC50+C2))*eff; e = eff+eff.err cp = centr*(1+cp.err) }) theta <- c(KA=2.94E-01, TCl=1.86E+01, V2=4.02E+01, # central Q=1.05E+01, V3=2.97E+02, # peripheral Kin=1, Kout=1, EC50=200) # effects sigma <- lotri(eff.err ~ 0.1, cp.err ~ 0.1) sim <- rxSolve(mod, theta, ev, omega=omega, nSub=100, sigma=sigma) s <- confint(sim, c("eff", "centr")); plot(s)
Sometimes you may want to match the dosing and observations of
individuals in a clinical trial. To do this you will have to create a
data.frame using the RxODE event specification as well as an ID
column to indicate an individual. The RxODE event vignette talks more about
how these datasets should be created.
ev1 <- eventTable(amount.units="mg", time.units="hours") %>% add.dosing(dose=10000, nbr.doses=1, dosing.to=2) %>% add.sampling(seq(0,48,length.out=10)); ev2 <- eventTable(amount.units="mg", time.units="hours") %>% add.dosing(dose=5000, nbr.doses=1, dosing.to=2) %>% add.sampling(seq(0,48,length.out=8)); dat <- rbind(data.frame(ID=1, ev1$get.EventTable()), data.frame(ID=2, ev2$get.EventTable())) ## Note the number of subject is not needed since it is determined by the data sim <- rxSolve(mod, theta, dat, omega=omega, sigma=sigma) sim %>% select(id, time, e, cp)
By either using a simple single event table, or data from a clinical trial as described above, a complete clinical trial simulation can be performed.
Typically in clinical trial simulations you want to account for the uncertainty in the fixed parameter estimates, and even the uncertainty in both your between subject variability as well as the unexplained variability.
RxODE allows you to account for these uncertainties by simulating
multiple virtual "studies," specified by the parameter nStud. In a
single virtual study:
A Population effect parameter is sampled from a multivariate normal
distribution with mean given by the parameter estimates and the
variance specified by the named matrix thetaMat.
A between subject variability/covariance matrix is sampled from either a scaled inverse chi-squared distribution (for the univariate case) or a inverse Wishart that is parameterized to scale to the conjugate prior covariance term, as described by the wikipedia article. (This is not the same as the scaled inverse Wishart distribution ). In the case of the between subject variability, the variance/covariance matrix is given by the 'omega' matrix parameter and the degrees of freedom is the number of subjects in the simulation.
Unexplained variability is also simulated from the scaled inverse chi squared distribution or inverse Wishart distribution with the variance/covariance matrix given by the 'sigma' matrix parameter and the degrees of freedom given by the number of observations being simulated.
The covariance/variance prior is simulated from RxODEs cvPost() function.
An example of this simulation is below:
## Creating covariance matrix tmp <- matrix(rnorm(8^2), 8, 8) tMat <- tcrossprod(tmp, tmp) / (8 ^ 2) dimnames(tMat) <- list(NULL, names(theta)) sim <- rxSolve(mod, theta, ev, omega=omega, nSub=100, sigma=sigma, thetaMat=tMat, nStud=10, dfSub=10, dfObs=100) s <-sim %>% confint(c("centr", "eff")) plot(s)
If you wish you can see what omega and sigma was used for each
virtual study by accessing them in the solved data object with
$omega.list and $sigma.list:
head(sim$omega.list)
head(sim$sigma.list)
You can also see the parameter realizations from the $params data frame.
If you do not wish to sample from the prior distributions of either
the omega or sigma matrices, you can turn off this feature by
specifying the simVariability = FALSE option when solving:
sim <- rxSolve(mod, theta, ev, omega=omega, nSub=100, sigma=sigma, thetaMat=tMat, nStud=10, simVariability=FALSE); s <-sim %>% confint(c("centr", "eff")) plot(s)
Note since realizations of omega and sigma were not simulated, $omega.list and
$sigma.list both return NULL.
RxODE now supports multi-threaded solving on OpenMP supported
compilers, including linux and windows. Mac OSX can also be supported
By default it uses all your available cores for solving as determined
by rxCores(). This may be overkill depending on your system, at a
certain point the speed of solving is limited by things other than
computing power.
You can also speed up simulation by using the multi-cores to generate
random deviates with mvnfast (either mvnfast::rmvn() or
mvnfast::rmvt()). This is controlled by the nCoresRV parameter.
For example:
sim <- rxSolve(mod, theta, ev, omega=omega, nSub=100, sigma=sigma, thetaMat=tMat, nStud=10, nCoresRV=2); p <- c(0.05, 0.5, 0.95); s <-sim %>% confint(c("eff", "centr"))
The default for this is 1 core since the result depends on the
number of cores and the random seed you use in your simulation.
However, you can always speed up this process with more cores if you
are sure your collaborators have the same number of cores available to
them and have OpenMP thread-capable compile.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.