AuthorYear (as in text) - Title
Bastille-Rousseau et al. (2017) Spatial scales of habitat selection decisions: implications for telemetry-based movement modelling. Ecography.
Bode NWF, Wood AJ, Franks DW (2011) Social networks and models for collective motion in animals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:117–130. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1111-0
Chamaillé-Jammes S, Fritz H, Valeix M, et al (2008) Resource variability, aggregation and direct density dependence in an open context: The local regulation of an African elephant population. J Anim Ecol 77:135–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01307.x
Cleasby IR, Wakefield ED, Morrissey BJ, et al (2019) Using time-series similarity measures to compare animal movement trajectories in ecology. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73:151
Davis et al. (2018) Estimating the robustness and uncertainty of animal social networks using different observational methods. Animal Behaviour.
Finn KR, Silk MJ, Porter MA, Pinter-wollman N (2019) The use of multilayer network analysis in animal behaviour. Anim Behav 149:7–22. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.12.016
Flack A, Nagy M, Fiedler W, et al (2018) From local collective behavior to global migratory patterns in white storks. Science (80- ) 914:911–914
He P, Maldonado-Chaparro AA, Farine DR (2019) The role of habitat configuration in shaping social structure: a gap in studies of animal social complexity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73:9
Hughey LF, Hein AM, Strandburg-Peshkin A, Jensen FH (2018) Challenges and solutions for studying collective animal behavior in the wild. Philos Trans R Soc B 373:20170005. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0005
Jolles JW, King AJ, Killen SS (2019) The role of individual heterogeneity in collective animal behaviour. Trends Ecol Evol 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.11.001
Long JA, Nelson TA, Webb SL, Gee KL (2014) A critical examination of indices of dynamic interaction for wildlife telemetry studies. J Anim Ecol 83:1216–1233. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12198
Mourier J, Ledee EJI, Jacoby DMP (2019) A multilayer perspective for inferring spatial and social functioning in animal movement networks. bioRxiv 1–26
Muller Z, Cantor M, Cuthill IC, Harris S (2018) Giraffe social preferences are context dependent. Anim Behav 146:37–49. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.10.006
Papageorgiou D, Christensen C, Gall GEC, et al (2019) The multilevel society of a small-brained bird. Curr Biol 29:R1120–R1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.072
Silk MJ, Finn KR, Porter MA, Pinter-Wollman N (2018) Can Multilayer Networks Advance Animal Behavior Research? Trends Ecol Evol 1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.008
Smith-Aguilar SE, Aureli F, Busia L, et al (2019) Using multiplex networks to capture the multidimensional nature of social structure. Primates 60:277–295. doi: 10.1007/s10329-018-0686-3
Spiegel O, Leu ST, Sih A, Bull CM (2016) Socially interacting or indifferent neighbours? Randomization of movement paths to tease apart social preference and spatial constraints. Methods Ecol Evol 7:971–979. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12553
Strandburg-Peshkin A, Farine DR, Couzin ID, Crofoot MC (2015) Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons. Science (80- ) 348:1358–1361
Strandburg-Peshkin A, Farine DR, Crofoot MC, Couzin ID (2017) Habitat structure shapes individual decisions and emergent group structure in collectively moving wild baboons. Elife 6:e19505. doi: 10.7554/eLife.19505
Van Moorter B, Rolandsen CM, Basille M, Gaillard J-M (2016) Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection. J Anim Ecol 85:21–31. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12394
Webber QMR, Vander Wal E (2018) An evolutionary framework outlining the integration of individual social and spatial ecology. J Anim Ecol 113–127. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12773
Almeling, L., Hammerschmidt, K., Sennhenn-Reulen, H., Freund, A. M., & Fischer, J. (2016). Motivational Shifts in Aging Monkeys and the Origins of Social Selectivity. Current Biology, 26(13), 1744–1749. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.066
Aplin, L. M., Firth, J. A., Farine, D. R., Voelkl, B., Crates, R. A., Culina, A., et al. (2015). Consistent individual differences in the social phenotypes of wild great tits, Parus major. Yanbe, 108(C), 117–127. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.016
Balasubramaniam, K. N., Beisner, B. A., Hubbard, J. A., Vandeleest, J. J., Atwill, E. R., & McCowan, B. (2019). Affiliation and disease risk: social networks mediate gut microbial transmission among rhesus macaques. Yanbe, 151, 131–143. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.03.009
Berger, V., Lemaître, J.-F., Allainé, D., Gaillard, J.-M., & Cohas, A. (2015). Early and adult social environments have independent effects on individual fitness in a social vertebrate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282(1813), 20151167. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01351.x
Brent, L. J. N., MacLarnon, A., Platt, M. L., & Semple, S. (2013). Seasonal changes in the structure of rhesus macaque social networks. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67(3), 349–359. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1455-8
Brent, L. J. N., Ruiz-Lambides, A., & Platt, M. L. (2017). Family network size and survival across the lifespan of female macaques. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284(1854), 20170515–7. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0515
Carter, A. J., Lee, A., & Marshall, H. H. (2015). Research questions should drive edge definitions in social network studies. Animal Behaviour, 104, e7–e11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.03.020
Castles, M., Heinsohn, R., Marshall, H. H., Lee, A. E. G., Cowlishaw, G., & Carter, A. J. (2014). Social networks created with different techniques are not comparable. Yanbe, 96(C), 59–67. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.07.023
Chen, S., White, B. J., Sanderson, M. W., Amrine, D. E., Ilany, A., & Lanzas, C. (2014). Highly dynamic animal contact network and implications on disease transmission. Scientific Reports, 4, 4472. http://doi.org/10.1038/srep04472
Ellis, S., Snyder-Mackler, N., Ruiz-Lambides, A., Platt, M. L., & Brent, L. J. N. (2019). Deconstructing sociality: the types of social connections that predict longevity in a group-living primate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286(1917), 20191991–10. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1991
Farine, D. R. (2015). Proximity as a proxy for interactions: issues of scale in social network analysis. Yanbe, 104, e1–e5. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.11.019
Farine, D. R. (2017). When to choose dynamic vs. static social network analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87(1), 128–138. http://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12764
Foster, E. A., Franks, D. W., Morrell, L. J., Balcomb, K. C., PARSONS, K. M., van Ginneken, A., & Croft, D. P. (2012). Social network correlates of food availability in an endangered population of killer whales, Orcinus orca. Animal Behaviour, 83(3), 731–736. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.021
Hamede, R. K., Bashford, J., McCallum, H., & Jones, M. (2009). Contact networks in a wild Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) population: using social network analysis to reveal seasonal variability in social behaviour and its implications for transmission of devil facial tumour disease. Ecology Letters, 12(11), 1147–1157. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01370.x
Holekamp, K. E., Smith, J. E., Strelioff, C. C., Van Horn, R. C., & Watts, H. E. (2012). Society, demography and genetic structure in the spotted hyena. Molecular Ecology, 21(3), 613–632. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05240.x
McDonald, D. B. (2007). Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(26), 10910–10914. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701159104
Oldham, S., Fulcher, B., Parkes, L., Arnatkevic̆iūtė, A., Suo, C., & Fornito, A. (2019). Consistency and differences between centrality measures across distinct classes of networks. PLoS ONE, 14(7), e0220061–23. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220061
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2017). A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I. Annual Reviews in Control, 43, 65–79. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002
Royle, N. J., Pike, T. W., Heeb, P., Richner, H., & Kolliker, M. (2012). Offspring social network structure predicts fitness in families. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279(1749), 4914–4922. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1701
Snijders, L., & Naguib, M. (2017). Communication in Animal Social Networks (Vol. 49, pp. 297–359). Elsevier. http://doi.org/10.1016/bs.asb.2017.02.004
Stanley, C. R., Mettke-Hofmann, C., Hager, R., & Shultz, S. (2018). Social stability in semiferal ponies: networks show interannual stability alongside seasonal flexibility. Yanbe, 136, 175–184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.04.013
Stanton, M. A., & Mann, J. (2012). Early social networks predict survival in wild bottlenose dolphins. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e47508. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047508
Stanton, M. A., Gibson, Q. A., & Mann, J. (2011). When mum’s away: a study of mother and calf ego networks during separations in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). Animal Behaviour, 82(2), 405–412. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.05.026
Tarka, M., Guenther, A., Niemelä, P. T., Nakagawa, S., & Noble, D. W. A. (2018). Sex differences in life history, behavior, and physiology along a slow-fast continuum: a meta-analysis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72(8), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2534-2
Thompson, N. A. (2019). Understanding the links between social ties and fitness over the life cycle in primates. Behaviour, 1–50. http://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003552
Berlingerio, Michele, et al. "Foundations of multidimensional network analysis." 2011 international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining. IEEE, 2011.
Boccaletti, Stefano, et al. "The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks." Physics Reports 544.1 (2014): 1-122.
Laura Graham (2019). grainchanger: Moving-Window and Direct Data Aggregation. R package version 0.3.0.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.