node_modules/neo-async/README.md

Neo-Async

npm Travis Status Coverage Status download Code Quality: Javascript Total Alerts

Neo-Async is thought to be used as a drop-in replacement for Async, it almost fully covers its functionality and runs faster.

Benchmark is here!

Bluebird's benchmark is here!

Code Coverage

coverage

Installation

In a browser

<script src="async.min.js"></script>

In an AMD loader

require(['async'], function(async) {});

Promise and async/await

I recommend to use Aigle.

It is optimized for Promise handling and has almost the same functionality as neo-async.

Node.js

standard

$ npm install neo-async
var async = require('neo-async');

replacement

$ npm install neo-async
$ ln -s ./node_modules/neo-async ./node_modules/async
var async = require('async');

Bower

bower install neo-async

Feature

JSDoc

* not in Async

Collections

Control Flow

Utils

Mode

Benchmark

Benchmark: Async vs Neo-Async

How to check

$ node perf

Environment

Result

The value is the ratio (Neo-Async/Async) of the average speed.

Collections

|function|benchmark| |---|--:| |each/forEach|2.43| |eachSeries/forEachSeries|1.75| |eachLimit/forEachLimit|1.68| |eachOf|3.29| |eachOfSeries|1.50| |eachOfLimit|1.59| |map|3.95| |mapSeries|1.81| |mapLimit|1.27| |mapValues|2.73| |mapValuesSeries|1.59| |mapValuesLimit|1.23| |filter|3.00| |filterSeries|1.74| |filterLimit|1.17| |reject|4.59| |rejectSeries|2.31| |rejectLimit|1.58| |detect|4.30| |detectSeries|1.86| |detectLimit|1.32| |reduce|1.82| |transform|2.46| |sortBy|4.08| |some|2.19| |someSeries|1.83| |someLimit|1.32| |every|2.09| |everySeries|1.84| |everyLimit|1.35| |concat|3.79| |concatSeries|4.45|

Control Flow

|funciton|benchmark| |---|--:| |parallel|2.93| |series|1.96| |waterfall|1.29| |whilst|1.00| |doWhilst|1.12| |until|1.12| |doUntil|1.12| |during|1.18| |doDuring|2.42| |times|4.25| |auto|1.97|



thisisnic/starrating documentation built on May 18, 2019, 1:32 p.m.