Description Format Author(s) References
This data set contains the fit of the cognitive model described in Ellison & Miceli (2017 - Language 93(2):255-287) - hereafter EM - to the data returned by the experiment also described in the paper.
A data frame with 35968726 rows and 9 columns. Of these, 3 columns are for internal use and can be ignored. The others fields are the following:
The form returned used (one doppel per stimulus, and abstract values indicating non-doppels used in English and Dutch).
Names for th 41 distinct meanings tested in the experiment. These take the form of "S"+<stimulus-number+"_"+(allcaps)<meaning>.
The language the simulated participant is trying to express their form in: either English or Dutch. In the experiment reported in EM,
articipants were only aiming to produce forms in English, so the values for Language="Dutch"
are not used in parameter-fitting.
Language mode varying from 0.00 to 1.00 in increments of 0.01.
Monitoring level varying from 0.00 to 1.00 in increments of 0.01.
The conditional probability of the form given the parameter values - basically, how well did the model do at predicting the frequency with which this form would be used by bilinguals.
T. Mark Ellison m.ellison@anu.edu.au
https://github.com/tyrannomark/bldR
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.