Description Format Source References Examples
These data includes the summaries of the ratings of 364 instructors at one large campus in the Midwest from Bleske-Rechek and Fritsch (2011). Each instructor included in the data had at least 10 ratings over a several year period. Students provided ratings on 5 point scales. The data file provides the averages ratings and additional characteristics of the instructors
A data frame with 364 observations on the following 17 variables.
gender
instructor gender, a factor with levels female
male
numYears
a numeric vector, number of years in which this instructor had ratings between 1999 and 2009.
numRaters
number of ratings
numCourses
number of different course titles included in the rating for this instructor
pepper
a factor with levels no
and yes
. In addition
to rating for quality, instructors are rated as attractive or not. A value of yes
means that the consensus is that
the instructor is attractive.
discipline
a factor with levels Hum
for humanities,
SocSci
for social sciences,
STEM
for science, technology, engineering and mathematics and
Pre-prof
for professional training
dept
a factor with department names Accounting
,
Anthropology
, Art
, Art and design
, Art History
,
Astronomy/Physics
, Biology
, Business
, Chemistry
,
Communication
, Communication Disorders
, Computer Science
,
Criminal Justice
, Curriculum and Instruction
, Dance
,
Economics
, English
, Environmental Public Health
,
Finance
, FLTR
, French
, Geography
, Geology
,
German
, History
, Information Systems
, Japanese
,
Kins
, Library Science
, Management
, Managerial Science
,
Marketing
, Math
, Music
, Nursing
, Philosophy
,
Physics
, Physics & Astronomy
, Physics and Astronomy
,
Political Science
, Psychology
, Religious Studies
,
Social Work
, Sociology
, Spanish
, Special Education
,
Theater
, Womens Studies
,
quality
Average quality rating, between 1, worst, to 5, best
helpfulness
Average helfpulness rating, between 1, worst, to 5, best
clarity
Average clarity rating, between 1, worst, to 5, best
easiness
Average easiness rating, between 1, worst, to 5, best
raterInterest
Average rater interest, between 1, lowest, to 5, highest
sdQuality
SD of quality rating
sdHelpfulness
SD of helpfulness rating
sdClarity
SD of clarity rating
sdEasiness
SD of easiness rating
sdRaterInterest
SD of rater interest
Provided by April Bleske-Rechek.
Bleske-Rechek, A. and Fritsch, A. (2011). Student Consensus on RateMyProfessors.com. Practical Assessment, Research \& Evaluation, 16(18), http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=16&n=18
1 |
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.