fractarithm | R Documentation |
Responses of 191 participants presented with 23 arithmetic problems with fractions. The participants were first-level middle school students (about 11 to 12 years old). A subset of 13 problems is included in Stefanutti and de Chiusole (2017).
data(fractarithm)
A list consisting of a single component:
R
a person-by-problem indicator matrix representing the responses of 191 persons to 23 problems. The responses are classified as correct (0) or incorrect (1).
The 23 problems were:
p01
%
\big(\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{12}\big) : \frac{2}{9} = ?
p02
%
\big(\frac{3}{2} + \frac{3}{4}\big) \times \frac{5}{3} - 2 = ?
p03
%
\big(\frac{5}{6} + \frac{3}{14}\big) \times
\big(\frac{19}{8} - \frac{3}{2}\big) = ?
p04
%
\big(\frac{1}{6} + \frac{2}{9}\big) - \frac{7}{36} = ?
p05
%
\frac{7}{10} + \frac{9}{10} = ?
p06
%
\frac{8}{13} + \frac{5}{2} = ?
p07
%
\frac{8}{12} + \frac{4}{15} = ?
p08
%
\frac{2}{9} + \frac{5}{6} = ?
p09
%
\frac{7}{5} + \frac{1}{5} = ?
p10
%
\frac{2}{7} + \frac{3}{14} = ?
p11
%
\frac{5}{9} + \frac{1}{6} = ?
p12
%
\big(\frac{1}{12} + \frac{1}{3}\big) \times \frac{24}{15} = ?
p13
%
2 - \frac{3}{4} = ?
p14
%
\big(4 + \frac{3}{4} - \frac{1}{2}\big) \times \frac{8}{6} = ?
p15
%
\frac{4}{7} + \frac{3}{4} = \frac{?}{28}
p16
%
\frac{5}{8} - \frac{3}{16} = \frac{? - ?}{16}
p17
%
\frac{3}{8} + \frac{5}{12} = \frac{? \times 3 + ? \times 5}{24}
p18
%
\frac{2}{7} + \frac{3}{5} = \frac{5 \times ? + 7 \times ?}{35}
p19
%
\frac{2}{3} + \frac{6}{9} = \frac{?}{9} = \frac{?}{?}
p20
Least common multiple lcm(6, 8) = ?
p21
%
\frac{7}{11} \times \frac{2}{3} = ?
p22
%
\frac{2}{5} \times \frac{15}{4} = ?
p23
%
\frac{9}{7} : \frac{2}{3} = ?
The data were made available by Debora de Chiusole, Andrea Brancaccio, and Luca Stefanutti.
Stefanutti, L., & de Chiusole, D. (2017). On the assessment of learning in competence based knowledge space theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 80, 22–32. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1016/j.jmp.2017.08.003")}
data(fractarithm)
## Subset of problems used in Sefanutti and de Chiusole (2017)
R <- fractarithm$R[, c(4:8, 10:11, 15:20)]
colnames(R) <- 1:13
N.R <- as.pattern(R, freq = TRUE)
## Conjunctive skill function in Table 1
sf1 <- read.table(header = TRUE, text = "
item a b c d e f g h
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
3 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
4 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1
5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
6 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1
7 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
8 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
9 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
12 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
13 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
")
## Delineated knowledge structure
K <- delineate(sf1)$K
blim(K, N.R)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.