MARSSoptim: Parameter estimation for MARSS models using optim

Description Usage Arguments Details Value Discussion Author(s) See Also Examples

View source: R/MARSSoptim.R


Parameter estimation for MARSS models using R's optim function. This allows access to R's quasi-Newton algorithms available via the optim function. The MARSSoptim function is called when MARSS is called with method="BFGS". This is a base function in the MARSS-package.





An object of class marssMLE.


Objects of class marssMLE may be built from scratch but are easier to construct using MARSS with MARSS(..., fit=FALSE, method="BFGS").

Options for optim are passed in using MLEobj$control. See optim for a list of that function's control options. If lower and upper for optim need to be passed in, they should be passed in as part of control as control$lower and control$upper. Additional control arguments affect printing and initial conditions.


The initial condition is at $t=0$ if kf.x0="x00". The initial condition is at $t=1$ if kf.x0="x10".


If diffuse=TRUE, a diffuse initial condition is used. MLEobj$par$V0 is then the scaling function for the diffuse part of the prior. Thus the prior is V0*kappa where kappa–>Inf. Note that setting a diffuse prior does not change the correlation structure within the prior. If diffuse=FALSE, a non-diffuse prior is used and MLEobj$par$V0 is the non-diffuse prior variance on the initial states. The the prior is V0.


Suppresses printing of progress bars, error messages, warnings and convergence information.


The marssMLE object which was passed in, with additional components:


String "BFGS".


Kalman filter output.


If MLEobj$control$trace = TRUE, then this is the $message value from optim.


Number of iterations needed for convergence.


Did estimation converge successfully?


Converged in less than MLEobj$control$maxit iterations and no evidence of degenerate solution.


Maximum number of iterations MLEobj$control$maxit was reached before MLEobj$control$abstol condition was satisfied.


Some of the variance elements appear to be degenerate. T


The algorithm was abandoned due to errors from the "L-BFGS-B" method.


The algorithm was abandoned due to numerical errors in the likelihood calculation from MARSSkf. If this happens with "BFGS", it can sometimes be helped with a better initial condition. Try using the EM algorithm first (method="kem"), and then using the parameter estimates from that to as initial conditions for method="BFGS".




State estimates from the Kalman filter.

Confidence intervals based on state standard errors, see caption of Fig 6.3 (p. 337) Shumway & Stoffer.


Any error messages.


The function only returns parameter estimates. To compute CIs, use MARSSparamCIs but if you use parametric or non-parametric bootstrapping with this function, it will use the EM algorithm to compute the bootstrap parameter estimates! The quasi-Newton estimates are too fragile for the bootstrap routine since one often needs to search to find a set of initial conditions that work (i.e. don't lead to numerical errors).

Estimates from MARSSoptim (which come from optim) should be checked against estimates from the EM algorithm. If the quasi-Newton algorithm works, it will tend to find parameters with higher likelihood faster than the EM algorithm. However, the MARSS likelihood surface can be multimodal with sharp peaks at degenerate solutions where a Q or R diagonal element equals 0. The quasi-Newton algorithm sometimes gets stuck on these peaks even when they are not the maximum. Neither an initial conditions search nor starting near the known maximum (or from the parameters estimates after the EM algorithm) will necessarily solve this problem. Thus it is wise to check against EM estimates to ensure that the BFGS estimates are close to the MLE estimates (and vis-a-versa, it's wise to rerun with method="BFGS" after using method="kem"). Conversely, there is a strong flat ridge in your likelihood, the EM algorithm can report early convergence while the BFGS may continue much further along the ridge and find very different parameter values. Of course a likelihood surface with strong flat ridges makes the MLEs less informative...

Note this is mainly a problem if the time series are short or very gappy. If the time series are long, then the likelihood surface should be nice with a single interior peak. In this case, the quasi-Newton algorithm works well but it can still be sensitive (and slow) if not started with a good initial condition. Thus starting it with the estimates from the EM algorithm is often desirable.

One should be aware that the prior set on the variance of the initial states at t=0 or t=1 can have catastrophic effects on one's estimates if the presumed prior covariance structure conflicts with the structure implied by the MARSS model. For example, if you use a diagonal variance-covariance matrix for the prior but the model implies a matrix with non-zero covariances, your MLE estimates can be strongly influenced by the prior variance-covariance matrix. Setting a diffuse prior does not help because the diffuse prior still has the correlation structure specified by V0. One way to detect priors effects is to compare the BFGS estimates to the EM estimates. Persistent differences typically signify a problem with the correlation structure in the prior conflicting with the implied correlation structure in the MARSS model. If this is the case, using V0=0 and estimating the x0 elements (with control$kf.x0="x10") can often help.


Eli Holmes, NOAA, Seattle, USA.


See Also

MARSS MARSSkem marssMLE optim


dat <- t(harborSealWA)
dat <- dat[2:4,] #remove the year row

#fit a model with EM and then use that fit as the start for BFGS
#fit a model with 1 hidden state where obs errors are iid
#R="diagonal and equal" is the default so not specified
#Q is fixed
kemfit <- MARSS(dat, model=list(Z=matrix(1,3,1),Q=matrix(.01)))
bfgsfit <- MARSS(dat, model=list(Z=matrix(1,3,1),Q=matrix(.01)), 
   inits=coef(kemfit,form="marss"), method="BFGS")

MARSS documentation built on April 14, 2018, 9:03 a.m.