knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE) knitr::opts_chunk$set(comment = "#>", collapse = TRUE) options(rmarkdown.html_vignette.check_title = FALSE) #title of doc does not match vignette title doc.cache <- T #for cran; change to F
In the SimTOST
R package, which is specifically designed for sample size estimation for bioequivalence studies, hypothesis testing is based on the Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure. [@sozu_sample_2015] In TOST, the equivalence test is framed as a comparison between the the null hypothesis of ‘new product is worse by a clinically relevant quantity’ and the alternative hypothesis of ‘difference between products is too small to be clinically relevant’. This vignette focuses on a parallel design, with 3 arms/treatments and 1 primary endpoint.
This vignette demonstrates advanced sample size calculation techniques for parallel trial designs involving three arms and one endpoint. Specifically, we calculate the required sample size to test bioequivalence between a new treatment (SB2) and a reference product (Remicade) administered in two different locations ("EU_Remicade" and "USA_Remicade"). The endpoint of interest is the Area Under the Curve (AUCinf), a commonly used pharmacokinetic measure.
In this example, we assume the endpoint follows a log-normal distribution with equal variances across arms. The goal is to determine the sample size needed to achieve 90\% power while controlling the type I error rate at 5\%. The equivalence margin is defined as $E_L = 80\%$ and $E_U = 125\%$ of the reference mean on the original scale.
The methods presented in this vignette build on fundamental bioequivalence testing concepts and extend them to multi-arm scenarios. These examples provide practical insights for designing robust parallel trials with complex equivalence testing requirements.
We assume that the primary endpoint, AUCinf, is on the original scale, with the mean and standard deviation for each arm available. This information is organized into a structured data table for further analysis:
library(SimTOST) data <- data.table::data.table(arm = c("SB2","RemEU","RemUSA"), mean = c(37162.0, 37705.0, 37702.8), sd = c(11113.62172, 12332.41615,12113.72))
This example demonstrates how to calculate the required sample size when testing the equivalence of SB2 to a reference drug, Remicade, as administered in the EU. The goal is to determine the minimum number of participants needed to ensure adequate power for the equivalence test.
Null Hypothesis (No Equivalence): $$H_0: \frac{\mu_{SB2}}{\mu_{RemEU}} \le E_L ~~ or~~ \frac{\mu_{SB2}}{\mu_{RemEU}} \ge E_U$$
Alternative Hypothesis (Equivalence):
$$H_1: E_L<\frac{\mu_{SB2}}{\mu_{RemEU}} < E_U$$
Here, $E_L$ and $E_U$ represent the lower and upper equivalence margins, respectively.
To proceed with the sample size calculation, we first need to organize the mean and standard deviation values of each arm (SB2, EU Remicade, USA Remicade) as list objects.
Since this example focuses on a single endpoint, the mean list (mu_list
) contains three scalar elements corresponding to each arm, and the standard deviation list (sigma_list
) contains three 1x1 matrix elements.
mu_list <- as.list(data$mean) # Organize mean values into a list sigma_list <- as.list(data$sd) # Organize standard deviation values into a list
Next, we define the comparison parameters, including the lower (lequi.tol
) and upper (uequi.tol
) equivalence boundaries, as well as the list of comparators. Since we are only comparing two arms (SB2 and EU Remicade), the list of comparators contains a single element specifying these two arms:
list_comparator <- list("Comparison" = c("SB2","RemEU")) list_lequi.tol <- list("Comparison" = 0.8) list_uequi.tol <- list("Comparison" = 1/0.8)
Finally, we use the sampleSize() function to calculate the required sample size based on stochastic simulations of the trial. The function accepts several parameters, such as the desired power, confidence level, and design specifications. By default, it assumes:
AUCinf_1comp <- sampleSize( power = 0.9, # Target power alpha = 0.05, # Confidence level arm_names = data$arm, # Names of trial arms list_comparator = list_comparator, # Comparator configuration mu_list = mu_list, # Mean values sigma_list = sigma_list, # Standard deviation values list_lequi.tol = list_lequi.tol, # Lower equivalence boundary list_uequi.tol = list_uequi.tol, # Upper equivalence boundary nsim = 1000 # Number of stochastic simulations ) AUCinf_1comp
The required sample size for this scenario is r AUCinf_1comp$response$n_total
, or r AUCinf_1comp$response$n_SB2
for each arm.
In this section, we calculate the sample size required to demonstrate equivalence with both the European reference product (RemEU) and the US reference product (RemUS). This scenario involves a more complex comparison, as we must simultaneously establish equivalence with two distinct reference arms.
Null Hypothesis (No Equivalence):
$$H_0: \frac{\mu_{SB2}}{\mu_{RemEU}} \le E_L ~~ or~~ \frac{\mu_{SB2}}{\mu_{RemEU}} \ge E_U~~ or~~ \frac{\mu_{SB2}}{\mu_{RemUSA}} \le E_L ~~ or~~ \frac{\mu_{SB2}}{\mu_{RemUSA}} \ge E_U$$
Alternative Hypothesis (Equivalence):
$$H_1: E_L<\frac{\mu_{SB2}}{\mu_{RemEU}} < E_U~~ and~~E_L<\frac{\mu_{SB2}}{\mu_{RemUSA}} < E_U$$ Key Considerations
Implementation of this scenario is similar to the initial example, in which the list_comparator
is modified to include multiple comparators. The list contains two elements specifying the simultaneous comparison between SB2 vs. RemEU and SB2 vs. RemUSA. This approach ensures that the equivalence assessment accounts for both reference products.
Additionally, we must specify equivalence boundaries for each comparison individually. These boundaries define the acceptable range for equivalence and are provided separately for each comparator.
list_comparator <- list("EMA" = c("SB2", "RemEU"), "FDA" = c("SB2", "RemUSA")) list_lequi.tol <- list("EMA" = 0.8, "FDA" = 0.8) # Lower equivalence boundary list_uequi.tol <- list("EMA" = 1/0.8, "FDA" = 1/0.8) # Upper equivalence boundary
We then pass these values into the sampleSize() function to calculate the required sample size for multiple comparisons.
(AUCinf_2comp <- sampleSize( power = 0.9, # Target power alpha = 0.05, # Confidence level arm_names = data$arm, # Names of trial arms list_comparator = list_comparator, # Comparator configuration mu_list = mu_list, # Mean values sigma_list = sigma_list, # Standard deviation values list_lequi.tol = list_lequi.tol, # Lower equivalence boundary list_uequi.tol = list_uequi.tol, # Upper equivalence boundary nsim = 1000 # Number of stochastic simulations ))
The required total sample size for this scenario is r AUCinf_2comp$response$n_total
. Notably, an additional r AUCinf_2comp$response$n_SB2 - AUCinf_1comp$response$n_SB2
patients per arm are required to achieve equivalence with both reference products (RemEU and RemUSA), compared to the scenario where equivalence is required with only one reference arm (r AUCinf_1comp$response$n_SB2
).
This example demonstrates the added complexity and sample size requirements when multiple comparators are involved in an equivalence trial.
The SimTOST package includes the plot() function, which is designed to permit visualization of the relationship between sample size (x-axis) and achieved power (y-axis) for all combinations of endpoints and comparators. In this example, we use the plot() function to generate a plot for the AUCinf_2comp
object.
plot(AUCinf_2comp)
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.