smartsva.cpp: Fast and robust surrogate variable analysis.

Description Usage Arguments Value References Examples

View source: R/SmartSVA.R

Description

The traditional SVA uses a fixed number of iterations. In highly-confounded scenarios (i.e., biological effects are confounded with batch effects), a large number of iterations are needed to achieve optimal results and better false positive control. SmartSVA thus imposes an explicit convergence criterion to improve the robustness of SVA. Moreover, we use three strategies to accelerate the computation: (1) more efficient initialization by using alpha; (2) QR decomposition to reduce the computational complexity; (3) Further acceleration using RcppEigen. Based on empirical studies, SmartSVA achieves is 10-50 times faster than traditional SVA on large data sets if the same convergence criterion is imposed.

Usage

1
2
smartsva.cpp(dat, mod, mod0 = NULL, n.sv, B = 100, alpha = 0.25,
  epsilon = 0.001, VERBOSE = F)

Arguments

dat

the measurement matrix, where rows are features and columns are samples.

mod

the model matrix being used to fit the data.

mod0

the null model matrix.

n.sv

the number of surrogate variables to estimate. The use of random matrix theory is recommended to estimate n.sv. See the example for more details.

B

the maximum iteration number.

alpha

determines the initial point for optimization which affects the convergence rate. Small values reduce the number of iterations needed to reach convergence; however, the solution could be trapped into a local optimum if the value is too small. The default value 0.25 works well across a wide range of tested scenarios. If computation is not a big concern, setting alpha = 1 will ensure optimality, producing the same result as traditional SVA if the same convergence criterion is used.

epsilon

the convergence threshold. The Spearman's correlation between posterior probabilities of consecutive iterations of the algorithm is compared to epsilon. Empirical evaluation on several data sets revealed epsilon=0.005 gives very reasonable results. However, we suggest epsilon=1e-3 as a conservative threshold.

VERBOSE

a logical variable. If TRUE, prints some details about iterative progress of the algorithm.

Value

Returns a list containing the surrogate variables and some meta data about the convergence criterion.

References

Jun Chen, Ehsan Behnam, Jinyan Huang, Miriam F. Moffatt, Daniel J. Schaid, Liming Liang, Xihong Lin. Fast and robust adjustment of cell mixtures in epigenome-wide association studies with SmartSVA. BMC Genomics, 2017 18:413

Examples

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
## Methylation M values (CpG by Sample)
Y <- matrix(rnorm(20*1000), 1000, 20)
df <- data.frame(pred=gl(2, 10))

## Determine the number of SVs
Y.r <- t(resid(lm(t(Y) ~ pred, data=df)))

## Add one extra dimension to compensate potential loss of 1 degree of freedom
##  in confounded scenarios (very important)
n.sv <- EstDimRMT(Y.r, FALSE)$dim + 1
mod <- model.matrix( ~ pred, df)
sv.obj <- smartsva.cpp(Y, mod, mod0=NULL, n.sv=n.sv)

## Speed comparison to traditional SVA
## Not run: 
## Methylation M values (CpG by Sample, 27K by 1,000)
require(sva)
require(SmartSVA)
Y <- matrix(rnorm(1000*27000), 27000, 1000)
df <- data.frame(pred=gl(2, 500))

## Determine the number of SVs
Y.r <- t(resid(lm(t(Y) ~ pred, data=df)))
n.sv <- 50
mod <- model.matrix( ~ pred, df)
system.time(sv.obj1 <- smartsva.cpp(Y, mod, mod0=NULL, B=5, alpha = 1, VERBOSE=TRUE, n.sv=n.sv))
system.time(sv.obj2 <- sva(Y, mod, mod0=NULL, B=5,  n.sv=n.sv))

## Check if the solutions are the same
head(sv.obj1$sv)
head(sv.obj2$sv)

## End(Not run)

SmartSVA documentation built on May 2, 2019, 8:54 a.m.