Nowacki and Abrams 1997, Black and Abrams 2003 or "pure boundary line".

Share:

Description

There is a split of behaviour of this function according parameter black.

Usage

1
2
3
4
noblabrams(data = NULL, prior = NULL, change = NULL, m1 = 10, m2 = 10, 
  boundary = NULL, buffer = 2, criteria = 0.25, criteria2 = 0.5, 
  segment = 0.5, segment2 = 0.5, black = FALSE, gfun = mean, length = 2, 
  notop = 10, notop2 = 10, storedev = pdf)

Arguments

data

A data.frame with series as columns and years as rows such as that produced by read.* function of dplR .

prior
change
m1

Determines the number of years to be averaged (including target year) for period prior the potential releas.

m2

Determines the number of years to be averaged (including target year) for period prior the potential releas.

boundary

Boundary line function of one argument, eg. boundary=function(x) {5.0067*exp(-0.664*x)}

buffer

Number of years determining how close to one another two releases can be.

criteria

Threshold for detection of moderate release

criteria2

Threshold for detection of major release.

segment

Determines length of the segment on which prior growth will be divided

segment2

Determines length of the segment on which first mm of prior growth will be divided.

black

If TRUE Black and Abrams 2003 method used else Nowacki and Abrams 1997.

gfun

Determines if M1 and M2 values are mean or median for selected period.

length

Determines how many years have to be given critera exceeded to be considered as release.

notop

Number of highest data points for fitting the boundary line.

notop2

Number of highest data points for fitting the boundary line in the segments for first mm.

storedev

Format for saving the graphical outputs, eg. pdf or jpeg.

Details

If black=TRUE: Boundary-line method scales the percent growth change of Nowacki & Abrams (1997) according to growth rate prior to disturbance. In their example, Black & Abrams (2003) defined moderate and major releases as those falling within 20-49.9%, and 50-100% of the boundary line, respectively. Advantage of the boundary-line is standardization, which takes into account the relationships among tree age, size, and canopy class determining radial growth rate (Black et al. 2004). On the downside, Black et al. (2009) suggest approximately 50000 ring width measurements is necessary for boundary line determination for a given species (Black et al. 2009).
If black=FALSE: Radial-growth averaging criteria developed by Nowacki & Abrams (1997) is one of the most often used techniques from this category. This method computes the percentage growth change (%GC) between average radial growth over the preceding 10-year period, M1 (including the target year), and average radial growth over the subsequent 10-year period, M2 (excluding the target year): %GC = [(M2-M1)/M1] * 100. Minimum threshold for release is 25% growth change for moderate and >50% for major release. The advantage of this method is its broad applicability even for a small number of samples, and that information about species autecology is not necessary. On the other hand, this generality of radial-growth averaging may lead to detection of false releases and missing of true releases (Black & Abrams 2003; Fraver & White 2005). These inaccuracies are primarily caused by different growth rates in young, small, and suppressed trees when compared to older, larger and dominant trees.

Value

Return list object with

releases

By length and buffer filtred percent growth change (PGC).

years

Release years per tree.

change

Original PGC.

pgc

Reduced releases values per tree and year.

years_list_total

Number of releases per year.

all_releases

All PGC above criteria.

Note

Rather use functions with ALL suffix.

Author(s)

Pavel Fibich <pavel.fibich@prf.jcu.cz>, Jan Altman <altman.jan@gmail.com>, Tuomas Aakala <tuomas.aakala@helsinki.fi>, Jiri Dolezal <jiriddolezal@gmail.com>

References

Nowacki, G.J. & Abrams, M.D. 1997. Radial-growth averaging criteria for reconstructing disturbance histories from presettlement-origin oaks. Ecological Monographs, 67, 225-249.
Black, B.A. & Abrams, M.D. (2003) Use of boundary-line growth patterns as a basis for dendroecological release criteria. Ecological Applications, 13, 1733-1749.
Black, B.A., Abrams, M.D., Gagen, M., Daniels, L.D., Kipfmueller, K.F., Speer, J.H. & Anchukaitis, K.J. (2004) Development and application of boundary-line release criteria. Dendrochronologia, 22, 31-42.
Black, B.A., Abrams, M.D., Rentch, J.S. & Gould, P.J. (2009) Properties of boundary-line release criteria in North American tree species. Annals of Forest Science, 66.

See Also

growthAveragingALL, boundaryLineALL, plotRelease, reduceByLB

Examples

1
2
3
4
5
6
data(relData)
rna<-noblabrams(relData1,black=FALSE) # for Nowacki and Abrams 1997
rba<-noblabrams(relData1,black=TRUE) # Black and Abrams 2003

plotRelease(relData1,rna$change,rna, 1, method="NowackiAbrams",addHLines=c(0.2))
plotRelease(relData1,rba$change,rba, 1, method="BlackAbrams",addHLines=c(0.2,0.5))