Description Usage Arguments Details Value Author(s) References See Also Examples
Calculates match probability of the genotype of the suspect and that of the crime stain presumed to have come from an offender other than the suspect. Possible assumptions: the suspect and an unknown offender are unrelated, or are members of the same subpopulation with a given coancestry coefficient, or are close relatives.
1 |
prob |
matrix with 2 rows and L columns (L is the number of loci, each locus has
2 alleles). Contains frequencies of alleles in a population found in the crime stain.
For homozygous locus just one entry is nonzero. |
k |
vector of kinship coefficients (k_0, k_1, k_2), where k_i is the probability that two people (the suspect and an unknown offender) will share i alleles identical by descent, i = 0, 1, 2. |
theta |
number from the interval [0,1). Coancestry coefficient
|
The match probability is calculated as
k_2 + k_1 Z_1 + k_0 Z_2,
where
k_0, k_1, k_2 are the kinship coefficients (for more information see
Details of Pevid.rel
),
Z_2 = [2*theta + (1-theta)*p_i]*[3*theta + (1-theta)*p_i] / [(1 + theta)*(1 + 2*theta)],
Z_2 = 2*[theta + (1-theta)*p_i]*[theta + (1-theta)*p_j] / [(1 + theta)*(1 + 2*theta)]
are the match probabilities in the unrelated case for homozygotes and heterozygotes, respectively, and
Z_1 = (2θ + (1-θ) p_i)/ (1+θ)
for the homozygote case and
Z_1 = (2θ + (1-θ) (p_i+p_j))/ (2(1+θ))
for the heterozygote case. The quantity θ is the coancestry population theta
.
The formula is derived in Balding and Nichols (1994).
The match probability at all loci is calculated as a product of all single locus probabilities. We assume independence across loci.
Pmatch
returns a list with the following components:
prob |
matrix of allele proportions at each locus (input value in
|
match |
single locus match probabilities |
total_match |
match probability of genotype = multiplication of single locus match probabilities |
Miriam Marusiakova maruskay@gmail.com
The work was supported by the project 1M06014 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.
Balding DJ, Nichols RA (1994), DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Science International 64, 125-140.
Evett IW, Weir BS (1998), Interpreting DNA evidence; Statistical genetics for forensic scientists. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
National Research Council (1996), The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 | ## match probability of thirteen-locus genotype
## (11 heterozygous and 2 homozygous loci)
p<-c(0.057,0.160,0.024,0.122,0.078,0.055,0.035,0.150,
0.195,0.027,0.084,0.061,0.122,0.083,0.164,0.065,0.143,
0.151,0.167,0.180,0.099,0.182,0.120,0,0.182,0)
## suspect and offender are unrelated
Pmatch(p)
## suspect and offender are unrelated but members of the same
## subpopulation with the coancestry coefficient theta
Pmatch(p, theta = 0.03)
## suspect and offender are close relatives (cousins)
Pmatch(p, k = c(3/4, 1/4, 0))
## suspect and offender are close relatives (cousins) and
## members of the same subpopulation with the coancestry
## coefficient theta
Pmatch(p, k = c(3/4, 1/4, 0), theta = 0.03)
##
## one locus
Pmatch(p[1:2], theta = 0.03)
Pmatch(p[25:26], theta = 0.03)
## compare
Pevid.gen(alleles = c(1, 2), prob = p[1:2], V = "1/2", x = 1,
theta = 0.03)
Pevid.gen(alleles = "a", prob = p[25], V = "a/a", x = 1,
theta = 0.03)
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.