dat.sc: Network Meta-Analysis of Smoking Cessation

In fragility: Assessing and Visualizing Fragility of Clinical Results with Binary Outcomes

Network Meta-Analysis of Smoking Cessation

Description

An illustrative example of network meta-analysis with a binary outcome.

Usage

data("dat.sc")

Format

A data frame containing 24 studies and 4 treatments, with the following 4 variables.

sid

a numeric vector indicating study IDs.

tid

a numeric vector indicating treatment IDs.

e

a numeric vector indicating event counts.

n

a numeric vector indicating sample sizes.

Details

The dataset was originally reported by Hasselblad (1998) and reanalyzed by Lu and Ades (2006) using formal network meta-analysis methods. It investigates the effects of four treatments on smoking cessation, including 1) no contact; 2) self-help; 3) individual counseling; and 4) group counseling. The outcome is binary, which is the smoking cessation status (yes or no) of a participant after treatment.

Source

Hasselblad V (1998). "Meta-analysis of multitreatment studies." Medical Decision Making, 18(1), 37–43. <\Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1177/0272989X9801800110")}>

Lu G, Ades AE (2006). "Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons." Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(474), 447–59. <\Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1198/016214505000001302")}>

fragility documentation built on April 11, 2025, 6 p.m.