Description Usage Arguments Details Value References Examples
Design a group sequential trial with negative binomial outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 |
rate1 |
numeric; assumed rate of treatment group 1 in the alternative |
rate2 |
numeric; assumed rate of treatment group 2 in the alternative |
dispersion |
numeric; dispersion (shape) parameter of negative binomial distribution |
ratio_H0 |
numeric; positive number denoting the rate ratio μ_1/μ_2 under the null hypothesis, i.e. the non-inferiority or superiority margin |
random_ratio |
numeric; randomization ratio n1/n2 |
power |
numeric; target power of group sequential design |
sig_level |
numeric; Type I error / significance level |
timing |
numeric vector; 0 < |
esf |
function; error spending function |
esf_futility |
function; futility error spending function |
futility |
character; either |
t_recruit1 |
numeric vector; recruit (i.e. study entry) times in group 1 |
t_recruit2 |
numeric vector; recruit (i.e. study entry) times in group 2 |
study_period |
numeric; study duration; to be set when follow-up times are not identical between subjects, NULL otherwise |
accrual_period |
numeric; accrual period |
followup_max |
numeric; maximum exposure time of a subject; to be set when follow-up times are to be equal for each subject, NULL otherwise |
accrual_speed |
numeric; determines accrual speed; values larger than 1 result in accrual slower than linear; values between 0 and 1 result in accrual faster than linear. |
... |
further arguments. Will be passed to the error spending function. |
Denote μ_1 and μ_2 the event rates in treatment groups 1 and 2. This function considers smaller event rates to be better. The statistical hypothesis testing problem of interest is
H_0: \frac{μ_1}{μ_2} ≥ δ vs. H_1: \frac{μ_1}{μ_2} < δ,
with δ=ratio_H0
.
Non-inferiority of treatment group 1 compared to treatment group 2 is tested for δ\in (1,∞).
Superiority of treatment group 1 over treatment group 2 is tested for δ \in (0,1].
The calculation of the efficacy and (non-)binding futility boundaries are performed
under the hypothesis H_0: \frac{μ_1}{μ_2}= δ and
under the alternative H_1: \frac{μ_1}{μ_2} = rate1
/ rate2
.
The argument 'accrual_speed' is used to adjust the accrual speed. Number of subjects in the study at study time t is given by f(t)=a * t^b with a = n / accrual_period and b=accrual_speed For linear recruitment, b=1. b > 1 results is slower than linear recruitment for t < accrual_period and faster than linear recruitment for t > accrual_period. Vice verse for b < 1.
A list with class "gsnb" containing the following components:
rate1 |
as input |
rate2 |
as input |
dispersion |
as input |
power |
as input |
timing |
as input |
ratio_H0 |
as input |
ratio_H1 |
ratio |
sig_level |
as input |
random_ratio |
as input |
power_fix |
power of fixed design |
expected_info |
list; expected information under |
efficacy |
list; contains the elements |
futility |
list; only part of the output if argument |
stop_prob |
list; contains the element |
t_recruit1 |
as input |
t_recruit2 |
as input |
study_period |
as input |
followup_max |
as input |
max_info |
maximum information |
calendar |
calendar times of data looks; only calculated when exposure times are not identical |
Mütze, T., Glimm, E., Schmidli, H., & Friede, T. (2018). Group sequential designs for negative binomial outcomes. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, <doi:10.1177/0962280218773115>.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 | # Calculate the sample sizes for a given accrual period and study period (without futility)
out <- design_gsnb(rate1 = 0.0875, rate2 = 0.125, dispersion = 5,
power = 0.8, timing = c(0.5, 1), esf = obrien,
ratio_H0 = 1, sig_level = 0.025,
study_period = 3.5, accrual_period = 1.25, random_ratio = 1)
out
# Calculate the sample sizes for a given accrual period and study period with binding futility
out <- design_gsnb(rate1 = 0.0875, rate2 = 0.125, dispersion = 5,
power = 0.8, timing = c(0.5, 1), esf = obrien,
ratio_H0 = 1, sig_level = 0.025, study_period = 3.5,
accrual_period = 1.25, random_ratio = 1, futility = "binding",
esf_futility = obrien)
out
# Calculate study period for given recruitment times
expose <- seq(0, 1.25, length.out = 1042)
out <- design_gsnb(rate1 = 0.0875, rate2 = 0.125, dispersion = 5,
power = 0.8, timing = c(0.5, 1), esf = obrien,
ratio_H0 = 1, sig_level = 0.025, t_recruit1 = expose,
t_recruit2 = expose, random_ratio = 1)
out
# Calculate sample size for a fixed exposure time
out <- design_gsnb(rate1 = 0.0875, rate2 = 0.125, dispersion = 5,
power = 0.8, timing = c(0.5, 1), esf = obrien,
ratio_H0 = 1, sig_level = 0.025,
followup_max = 0.5, random_ratio = 1)
# Different timing for efficacy and futility analyses
design_gsnb(rate1 = 1, rate2 = 2, dispersion = 5,
power = 0.8, esf = obrien,
ratio_H0 = 1, sig_level = 0.025, study_period = 3.5,
accrual_period = 1.25, random_ratio = 1, futility = "binding",
esf_futility = pocock,
timing_eff = c(0.8, 1),
timing_fut = c(0.2, 0.5, 1))
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.