Nothing
#' Example data for a meta-analysis of standardized mean differences: Homeopathic treatment vs. Placebo
#'
#' A dataset consisting of 54 randomized control trials (RCTs) from a published meta-analysis
#' (Mathie et al. 2017) comparing homeopathic treatment with placebo. See reference for further details.
#'
#' @format A data frame with 54 rows and 4 variables:
#' \describe{
#' \item{name}{short name of each RCT}
#' \item{year}{publication year of each RCT}
#' \item{d}{observed effect size (Standardized mean differences). Negative effect sizes indicate superiority of homeopathic treatment.}
#' \item{se}{standard error of observed effect size}
#' }
#' @references Mathie, R. T., Ramparsad, N., Legg, L. A., Clausen, J., Moss, S.,
#' Davidson, J. R., ... McConnachie, A. (2017). Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled
#' trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
#' \emph{Systematic Reviews}, \emph{6}, 63.
"homeopath"
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.