# Replacing values with NA In naniar: Data Structures, Summaries, and Visualisations for Missing Data

```knitr::opts_chunk\$set(
collapse = TRUE,
comment = "#>"
)
```

When dealing with missing values, you might want to replace values with a missing values (`NA`). This is useful in cases when you know the origin of the data and can be certain which values should be missing. For example, you might know that all values of "N/A", "N A", and "Not Available", or -99, or -1 are supposed to be missing.

`naniar` provides functions to specifically work on this type of problem using the function `replace_with_na()`. This function is the compliment to `tidyr::replace_na()`, which replaces an NA value with a specified value, whereas `naniar::replace_with_na()` replaces a value with an NA:

• `tidyr::replace_na()`: Missing values turns into a value (NA --> -99)
• `naniar::replace_with_na()`: Value becomes a missing value (-99 --> NA)

In this vignette, we describe some simple use cases for these functions and describe how they work.

# Example data

First, we introduce a small fictional dataset, `df`, which contains some common features of a dataset with the sorts of missing values we might encounter. This includes multiple specifications of missing values, such as "N/A", "N A", and "Not Available". And also some common numeric codes, like -98, -99, and -1.

```df <- tibble::tribble(
~name,           ~x,  ~y,              ~z,
"N/A",           1,   "N/A",           -100,
"N A",           3,   "NOt available", -99,
"N / A",         NA,  29,              -98,
"Not Available", -99, 25,              -101,
"John Smith",    -98, 28,              -1)
```

## Using `replace_with_na()`

What if we want to replace the value -99 in the `x` column with a missing value?

First, let's load `naniar`:

```library(naniar)
```

Now, we specify the fact that we want to replace -99 with a missing value. To do so we use the `replace` argument, and specify a named list, which contains the names of the variable and the value it would take to replace with `NA`.

```df %>% replace_with_na(replace = list(x = -99))
```

And say we want to replace -98 as well?

```df %>%
replace_with_na(replace = list(x = c(-99, -98)))
```

And then what if we want to replace -99 and -98 in all the numeric columns, x and z?

```df %>%
replace_with_na(replace = list(x = c(-99,-98),
z = c(-99, -98)))
```

Using `replace_with_na()` works well when we know the exact value to be replaced, and for which variables we want to replace, providing there are not many variables. But what do you do when you've got many variables you want to observe?

## Extending `replace_with_na()`

Sometimes you have many of the same value that you want to replace. For example, -99 and -98 above, and also the variants of "NA", such as "N/A", and "N / A", and "Not Available". You might also have certain variables that you want to be affected by these rules, or you might have more complex rules, like, "only affect variables that are numeric, or character, with this rule".

To account for these cases we have borrowed from `dplyr`'s scoped variants and created the functions:

• `replace_with_na_all()` Replaces NA for all variables.
• `replace_with_na_at()` Replaces NA on a subset of variables specified with character quotes (e.g., c("var1", "var2")).
• `replace_with_na_if()` Replaces NA based on applying an operation on the subset of variables for which a predicate function (is.numeric, is.character, etc) returns TRUE.

Below we will now consider some very simple examples of the use of these functions, so that you can better understand how to use them.

## Using `replace_with_na_all()`

Use `replace_with_na_all()` when you want to replace ALL values that meet a condition across an entire dataset. The syntax here is a little different, and follows the rules for rlang's expression of simple functions. This means that the function starts with `~`, and when referencing a variable, you use `.x`.

For example, if we want to replace all cases of -99 in our dataset, we write:

```df %>% replace_with_na_all(condition = ~.x == -99)
```

Likewise, if you have a set of (annoying) repeating strings like various spellings of "NA", then I suggest you first lay out all the offending cases:

```# write out all the offending strings
na_strings <- c("NA", "N A", "N / A", "N/A", "N/ A", "Not Available", "NOt available")
```

Then you write `~.x %in% na_strings` - which reads as "does this value occur in the list of NA strings".

```df %>%
replace_with_na_all(condition = ~.x %in% na_strings)
```

You can also use the built-in strings and numbers in naniar:

• `common_na_numbers`
• `common_na_strings`
```common_na_numbers
common_na_strings
```

And you can replace values matching those strings or numbers like so:

```df %>%
replace_with_na_all(condition = ~.x %in% common_na_strings)
```

### `replace_with_na_at()`

This is similar to `_all`, but instead in this case you can specify the variables that you want affected by the rule that you state. This is useful in cases where you want to specify a rule that only affects a selected number of variables.

```df %>%
replace_with_na_at(.vars = c("x","z"),
condition = ~.x == -99)
```

Although you can achieve this with regular `replace_with_na()`, it is more concise to use, `replace_with_na_at()`. Additionally, you can specify rules as function, for example, make a value NA if the exponent of that number is less than 1:

```df %>%
replace_with_na_at(.vars = c("x","z"),
condition = ~ exp(.x) < 1)
```

### `replace_with_na_if()`

There may be some cases where you can identify variables based on some test - `is.character()` - are they character variables? `is.numeric()` - Are they numeric or double? and a given value inside that type of data. For example,

```df %>%
replace_with_na_if(.predicate = is.character,
condition = ~.x %in% ("N/A"))

# or
df %>%
replace_with_na_if(.predicate = is.character,
condition = ~.x %in% (na_strings))
```

This means that you are able to apply a rule to many variables that meet a pre-specified condition. This can be of particular use if you have many variables and don't want to list them all, and also if you know that there is a particular problem for variables of a particular class.

# Notes on alternative ways to handle replacing with NAs

There are some alternative ways to handle replacing values with NA in the tidyverse, `na_if` and using `readr`. These are ultimately not as expressive as the `replace_with_na()` functions, but they are very useful if you only have one kind of value to replace with a missing, and if you know what the missing values are upon reading in the data.

`dplyr::na_if`

This function allows you to replace exact values - similar to `replace_with_na()`, but for all columns in a data frame. Here is how you would use it in our examples.

```# instead of:
df_1 <- df %>% replace_with_na_all(condition = ~.x == -99)
df_1

df_2 <- df %>% dplyr::na_if(-99)
df_2

# are they the same?
all.equal(df_1, df_2)
```

Note, however, that `na_if()` can only take arguments of length one. This means that it cannot capture other statements like

```na_strings <- c("NA", "N A", "N / A", "N/A", "N/ A", "Not Available", "NOt available")
df_3 <- df %>% replace_with_na_all(condition = ~.x %in% na_strings)
```
```# Not run:
df_4 <- df %>% dplyr::na_if(x = ., y = na_strings)
# Error in check_length(y, x, fmt_args("y"), glue("same as {fmt_args(~x)}")) :
# argument "y" is missing, with no default
```

It also cannot handle more complex equations, where you want to refer to values in other columns, or values less than or greater than another value.

catch NAs with `readr`

When reading in your data, you can use the `na` argument inside `readr` to replace certain values with NA. For example:

```# not run
This would convert all of the values in `na_strings` into missing values.